• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

  • The rule regarding AI content has been updated. The rule now rules as follows:

    Be sure to credit AI when copying and pasting AI sources. Link to the site of the AI search, just like linking to an article.

Another look at the moon landing.

Yep, just like your digital camera, which scans the CCD sensor in the back of your camera which is sensitive to visible light in the red, green and blue spectrum. The ABI has sensors sensitive to various spectrums ranging from visible to near infrared to deep infrared. At its core it is just a very sensitive digital camera.

Actually, if you take your cellphone or digital camera and focus it on the IR light on one of your remote controls and push a button, you can see the IR LED flash on the screen of the camera.
Upvote 0

WHY WATER BAPTISIM HAD TO GO AWAY ??

.Adult believers water immersion is to be a physical outward representation of what had or is happening spiritually in the person being baptized. It is mainly to help the individual being baptized to better grasp what is going on, but it can “witness” to others observing the baptism. It has the elements of going down under the water (burying the old man), placing your dependence in another; the person baptizing you (surrendering your life to God),
Paul said,(when writing that Christ sent him not to baptize, (1 Cor. .1), in contrast to those who have many words or the wisdom of words. There are all sorts of human understandings to try snd keep the old covenant diverse washings and carnal ordinances abd to try to explain water baptism in many ways . Paul said,

1 Corinthians 1: 17. For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.”

Notice agsin he says that baptism (referring to water baptism) is not part of the gospel of connected to the saving gospel. He also says, not with the wisdom of words, this includes all the arguments of why water baptism is still needed. Then because key part “lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect”. The cross puts to death all works of the flesh or human effort to work righteousness for salvation. If any work could be added to the saving gospel that we do or another does? Then the cross would be of no effect. We see similar wording in Galatians 6 about some trying to get people circumcised lest they should suffer persecution for the cross of Christ.
being washed (having your sins washed away),
Water does not wash away sins the blood of Christ does that and this is understood through the cleansing of the word . The pure word of God pure water. We see this washing of sins here clearly

Revelation 1: 5. And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood,”

Without the shedding of blood there is no remission. It is Gods righteousness through the blood of Christ that is for remission of sins. Not water types or shadows no diverse washings or carnal ordinances could make the conscience clean or perfect or good. As we read in Hebrews 9.

Consider

“ Romans 3: 24. Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: 25. Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;”
rising out of the water (rising from the old dead body)
The figures are not the inward reality of being born again raised up with Christ.

Continued….
Upvote 0

Another look at the moon landing.

You asked - How can you have satellites on a flat earth?

I answered your question
No you didn't. He didn't ask how you could have balloons on a flat earth.
You did not ask how are images recorded to make a fake globe earth.
Of course not. There is no fake globe earth.
Upvote 0

Neighbor/Sojourner/Stranger/Immigrant

That's ridiculous logic. By that logic, there was nothing immoral about anything Stalin or Hitler did, either.
So you consider Romans 13:1-7 to be ridiculous. Noted. Sure, there are passages in which Apostles violated laws due to their obedience (Acts 5:27-29), and they were praised by God for it. But there is nowhere in scripture in which anyone violated the laws of the land and did not receive consequences. Afterall, even Daniel was thrown into the lion's den.
Upvote 0

Sabbath Keeping and The Gospel

Please note that you said you agreed, for later when you seem to think I didn't answer.

You made the statement;
  • You didn't answer the question about what exactly they expected Gentiles to keep.
I replied,

"Jesus tells you the answer to this question in Matt. 23:1-4. As I pointed out in earlier post, the Apostles also understood that the Gentiles would grow in the knowledge of God by hearing the Holy Scriptures that Paul taught both Jew and Gentile were trustworthy "for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works."."

Matt. 23: 1 Then spake Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples, 2 Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat:

3 All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, "that observe and do"; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.

4 For they (Pharisees, not God or Moses) bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and "lay them on men's shoulders"; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.

The philosophy that 1 sentence spoken in act's 15 makes the Word's of the Lord's Christ here void, irrelevant, or a vain deceit, though perhaps popular in the religions of the world God placed us in, Is not the Gospel of Christ, as defined by the Holy Scriptures.

Can you really not see the point the Scriptures are making here?

And concerning the Pharisees trying to be Justified by the "works of the Law", I'm not sure if you are just trolling me or what, but lets post it again.

This is true, the Pharisees were a religion that despised God's Judgments, full well "rejected God's Commandments" by walking in their own religious traditions. They taught for doctrines the Commandments of men, "not God". They created their own high days, polluted God's Sabbaths and were, according to Jesus , "children of the devil". And yet every week they would gather together and offer to God the Blood of an unblemished, innocent life, as per the Law, to justify their disobedience. But as God teaches through Isaiah (Is. 1:1-20) and through Paul, "No Flesh is Justified by works of the LAW".

Is this not the "yoke" the pharisees were placing on the necks of the Gentiles that the Disciples and their fathers before them couldn't bear?

And today, if a religion that exists in the world God placed me in, calls Jesus Lord, Lord, prophesies in His Name, casts our devils in His Name, creates massive religious businesses all in His Name, but they despise God's Judgments, full well reject God's commandments by their own religious traditions, rejects God's sabbaths and creates their own high days instead,, created and promotes images of God in the likeness of man, and yet every week they offer to God the BLOOD of the PERFECT Lamb of God, "as per the Law", to justify them of their willful disobedience, are they justified by "works of the Law"?

Are they not just a different version of the Pharisees religion, who believes? satan believes too, Yes? Doesn't Jesus speak to this very thing in Matt. 7?

So then aren't you and I, just like Eve, Noah, Abraham, Caleb, David, Daniel, Shadrack, Zacharias, Simeon, Paul, James, Cornelius, and even Jesus Himself, all placed in a world by God in which other religious voices exist, that profess to know God, even quoting some of God's Word, but promote disobedience to God? And wasn't "EVERY ONE" of these examples, except the last ONE, snared by this voice? And wasn't EVERY ONE of these examples, except the Last One, called out of this deception, to repent and turn to God and turn away from the religious voice that exists in the world God placed us in, to as Jesus teaches, "Go and Sin no more"?

And now I am to just forget and reject all of these things because of this world's religions interpretation of this one sentence in Act's 15?

I really hope you might reconsider the philosophy you have adopted on this matter. But it is your choice.

But of course, the whole debate in this thread is whether Gentile believers had to keep Israelite appointed times. And that is not just one passage to look at, but multiple.

No Sir, that's not the debate in Acts 15 at all. The debate was, are the Gentiles to be converted to the "Jews religion" they "said" was founded on the Law of Moses, but the Apostles knew it wasn't. (Because they believed Jesus and the Prophets) Or should they "Yield themselves" to God and their bodies as instruments of Righteousness unto God? And the Apostles turned the Gentiles away from the "Jews religion" and towards the Law of Moses, that Jesus taught them to observe and do.

17 That the residue of men "might seek after the Lord", and all the Gentiles, upon whom my name is called, saith the Lord, who doeth all these things. (Not seek after the Jews religion, that rejected the "Lord")

18 Known unto God are all his works from the beginning of the world. (And HE sent Moses to show them to us, as well as them)

19 Wherefore my sentence is, that we trouble not them, which from among the Gentiles are turned to God:

20 But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, (Law of Moses) and from fornication, (Law of Moses) and from things strangled, (Law of Moses) and from blood. (Law of Moses)

21 For Moses of old time hath in every city them that preach him, being read in the synagogues every sabbath day. (By those who sit in Moses seat)

So the Apostles settled the debate about whether a man should adopt the religions of the world God placed them in, (In their case, the Pharisees, in our case, other religions) or should they present their bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is their reasonable service. And be not conformed to this world: but be transformed by the renewing of their mind, that they may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God. Trusting the Holy scriptures for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works."

Clearly the Apostles promoted the latter.

The philosophy that verse 20 wipes out the entire Gospel of Christ, or any Word Jesus Spoke, or any of Paul's teaching throughout his Epistles, might be popular in the religious sects and businesses which existed in this world that God placed us in, but the Holy Scriptures doesn't teach this philosophy at all, at least not according to all that is written.
Upvote 0

Other countries are doing it...

So perhaps my answer to your question is.... Someone.
You can't just arrest "someone". Unlike some of these other countries you can't arrest on suspicion. You have to have probable cause that they actually committed a crime.

Hanging out with or emailing Epstien is not a crime.

I most certainly want whomever was involved in pedophilia or was involved in other crimes, financial, illegally providing government documents or information to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. But you don't have any clue who shoild be prosecuted and you don't know what the DOJ has or knows or has or has not investigated and you have no idea what has been ot has not been discovered.

We want CRIMES charged. Not suspicion.
  • Like
Reactions: Servus
Upvote 0

Another look at the moon landing.

GOES-16 and GOES-17, also known as GOES-East and GOES-West respectively, provide beautiful images of Earth. However, what you see on your television, computer, and mobile device are digital representations of the data these satellites capture, not actual photographs or videos. So how are these images created?

Transforming Energy into Imagery: How Satellite Data Becomes Stunning Views of Earth
Yep, just like your digital camera, which scans the CCD sensor in the back of your camera which is sensitive to visible light in the red, green and blue spectrum. The ABI has sensors sensitive to various spectrums ranging from visible to near infrared to deep infrared. At its core it is just a very sensitive digital camera.
Upvote 0

Neighbor/Sojourner/Stranger/Immigrant

That's ridiculous logic. By that logic, there was nothing immoral about anything Stalin or Hitler did, either.
What's ridiculous is accusing a huge majority of the church as being racist or mistreating people simply because they want to enforce the same law that every nation has.
Upvote 0

Neighbor/Sojourner/Stranger/Immigrant

That's appealing to a concept, the nation-state, that didn't even exist in biblical times in modern form. There were city states, kingdoms, and empire, but the idea of a nation as being bound together by a political order was quite foreign. It was quite normal in biblical times for people to migrate to other areas - national identity was more fluid.
That is great. However, unless you are suggesting that the United States returns to a borderless group of city states and dissolving their national sovereignty, then I am not sure were you are going with this. Perhaps the most fair thing to do is to apply the same immigration standards to the illegal immigrant as the country of origin. For example, if they illegally came here from Mexico, they should be treated just like a US citizen would be treated if they illegally immigrated into Mexico.
Upvote 0

Will we be vegetarians in eternity?

Dairy with even cheese or eggs were not included in the provision from God in the design for us that alone in the Bible God called very good. It was consistent with vegan values. Our dependence on God and provisions we have from God were meant for us, there was the design for this, it will be that way again among those coming to God, in what comes. Really God loves us and made this world that would provide for all living here. Many contribute to ruining it. We can still learn of the design and see what is meant for us, such of us doing that will not still contribute to ruining it. We can help environments with not having demand contributing to more that worsens anything of the world provided to us from God.

It was not early in life when I found information that we could be healthy without meat in our diet and saw I could continue without it, and was happy with thinking this way did not contribute to the slaughter of animals. That was just about twenty years ago. It was before I was online. But with use of online access, I learned in group communication about the issues to all animals in the industries, the effect on environment, the greater use of land, water, and resources, I knew to give up all animal products, a couple of years after that I found the healthier way with whole foods from plants avoiding processed stuff that comes in food many choose. I see benefits with this healthy way, and now know to use a lot of variety, which is best.

The last meal I was making was with quinoa, and it was with carrot, broccoli, asparagus, celery, kale, cabbage, olives, lentils, various nuts and seeds, guacamole, hummus, and medium salsa, I added seasonings and some dry seaweed to it. What more could I have added to make it tastier? I do not think you can tell me anything that would be doing that.
Upvote 0

Trump says he’s sending hospital ship to Greenland

Something not mentioned is that Denmark doesn't exactly have a sterling record when it comes to the Inuit. Whatever the situation may be now, that perception may still be there among the Inuit. And if there's going to be a rapid build-up of facilities within the agreed upon boundaries of US installations, it would be good to have something handy until base facilities can handle the increase. And yes, if there is anticipated to be some sort of conflict in the region, one that countries like Denmark may want to sit out, it would be good not to have to rely on their facilities.

In either event, there's no reason to accept the stated reason at face value. Positioning a hospital ship with the rhetoric that it's to help Greenlanders sound a lot better than the other possible reasons. Even "Trump's nuts" works better than "Get ready for war." And if the stated reason sits well with the Inuit, it makes a nice, political, wedge, particularly if long-range plans include annexation of Greenland.
Upvote 0

Neighbor/Sojourner/Stranger/Immigrant

We are the church not ancient Israel. The church is not a theocracy

The rabbi is making a moral point, not a political one. If you despise and mistreat immigrants, you are not keeping Torah.

I don't know what your church believes, but the traditional Christian belief is that the Torah expresses God's will through moral law, when properly expounded.
Upvote 0

Neighbor/Sojourner/Stranger/Immigrant

The rabbi is not a "liberal", he's a Jewish teacher of Torah/Law. Jews wrote the Bible, so I'd guess they'ld have some expertise in understanding it's meaning?
We are the church not ancient Israel. The church is not a theocracy
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,883,355
Messages
65,494,609
Members
276,649
Latest member
HarpazotheSaved