Latest activity

NxNW · 2025-08-03T09:48:39-0500

Hentenza said:
So you claim that these were not policies so they never happened? How is it that these “policies” only happen when the Democratic Party is in power?

There were no such policies. They were trending phrases in social media, and that's about it. Nobody ever defunded the police.

Hentenza · 2025-08-03T09:48:19-0500

NxNW said:
Here's the real question for 2028: Shapiro, Bashear, Whitmer, or Klobuchar?

Personally I'd like to see Shapiro/Whitmer. That should pretty much clean up the swing states. No way Bashear wins Kentucky (remember Gore losing his home state of TN?)

How about Newsom? He has aspirations?

NBB · 2025-08-03T09:47:55-0500

Maria Billingsley said:
It would be interesting to know the people, if they exist, who live in "perfect harmony" as to get every whim, wish and prayer granted by our Father.
Thanks for sharing!

Be blessed.

We are full of defects, i don't think we need to have 'perfect armony' to receive from God, Jesus died for us, we just need to have His Holy spirit like the disciples, because it says 'and you will receive power when the Holy spirit comes to you', and keep seeking God the bible promises God responds when we pray and cry out to him. But even the prophets etc, didn't get 'every whim' i think.

essentialsaltes · 2025-08-03T09:47:47-0500

Interior Ends Preferential Treatment for Unreliable, Subsidy-Dependent Wind and Solar Energy

Nuclear is also heavily subsidized by the taxpayer. (as are fossil fuels)

Hentenza · 2025-08-03T09:47:11-0500

NxNW said:
There were no such policies, other than Portland. Personally I favor legalizing it all and letting Darwin take its course.

So you claim that these were not policies so they never happened? How is it that these “policies” only happen when the Democratic Party is in power?

DaisyDay · 2025-08-03T09:46:59-0500

mark46 said:
Let's be clear. Trump is one of the worst presidents ever. HOWEVER, why folks want Vance to step in is frankly beyond my comprehension.

Given the limited choice of JD Vance and someone sliding into dementia, apparently, I'll have to choose the former because at least he might be held accountable for any crimes he may commit - and he may actually not commit any. Trump's criminality is a separate issue from his apparent dementia.

mark46 said:
Biden ...

This particular thread is about Trump's confabulation. Biden is off-topic. Thank you for your future cooperation on this point.

NxNW · 2025-08-03T09:45:02-0500

Here's the real question for 2028: Shapiro, Bashear, Whitmer, or Klobuchar?

Personally I'd like to see Shapiro/Whitmer. That should pretty much clean up the swing states. No way Bashear wins Kentucky (remember Gore losing his home state of TN?)

Akita Suggagaki · 2025-08-03T09:44:18-0500

essentialsaltes said:
Bring me the messenger!

Trump fires BLS chief for bad news

Trump fires commissioner of labor statistics after weaker-than-expected jobs figures slam markets President Donald Trump on Friday fired the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner, hours after the agency reported that job growth in the U.S. had slowed to a near-halt. In a Truth Social post...

www.christianforums.com

Now what does this mean about the reliability of future jobs numbers, or any economic data?

Will their be two sets of data? One for the public and a secret one for insiders who know the truth?

NxNW · 2025-08-03T09:42:37-0500

Hentenza said:
Nah. We are going to disagree. Failed policies like defund the police, soft on crime, the erosion of parental rights, the legalization of hard drugs that killed thousands in Portland, the hypocrisy of white privilege

There were no such policies, other than Portland. Personally I favor legalizing it all and letting Darwin take its course.

BCP1928 · 2025-08-03T09:42:33-0500

ThatRobGuy said:
I think that touches on another aspect of the ideological conflict.

The hermanutics aspect is one that's something of a sticking point for the religious conservatives, and to be honest, I think their frustration with that is somewhat understandable.

Whenever that concept is invoked, almost without fail, it's almost always from a progressive-leaning academic perspective that has the predictable conclusion of "and here's why all of the things that align with my preferences are applicable, but all the things that the other team wants aren't meant to be taken literally or no longer apply"

And it's typically received as condescension.

"We don't believe your book is real, but for those of you who do believe it, we are going to tell you the correct way to believe in it... Which, as luck would have it, aligns with our political ideology"

Or, in a practical phrasing:

"Here's why all of the verses that would support welcoming migrants and giving money to the poor are still valid, but all that stuff it says about gays and women doesn't apply anymore"

True enough, with the caveat that many of your (shall we call them, for convenience) Liberals are in fact Christians who believe they have as sincere an understand of the Bible as Conservatives.

But the issue here is rather different. Here we have a secular organization quoting a specific passage of scripture in contradiction to its widely understood meaning in order to appeal to laymen.

enoob57 · 2025-08-03T09:41:44-0500

Christsfreeservant said:
The written word is not the exclusion of the voice of the Holy Spirit

According to the leading of scripture, it should be only scripture that we rely upon as foundation for all else

Christsfreeservant said:
God told us that we should be hearing the Spirit's voice

Chapter and verse please

ralliann · 2025-08-03T09:29:55-0500

DaisyDay said:
I realize that sounds like the sort of propaganda that is always spewed to demonize the enemy. How much of it is actual we really don't know at this point.

Yes we do know.

DaisyDay said:
I'm not sure what this has to do with the Whites-only community....unless you are identifying/equating Israeli Jews with American Whites and evil Palestinians with non-White Americans?

Someone brought it up as often happens in threads. So who is equating here. Hamas is evil .

BCP1928 · 2025-08-03T09:23:41-0500

Hentenza said:
Nah. We are going to disagree. Failed policies like defund the police, soft on crime, the erosion of parental rights, the legalization of hard drugs that killed thousands in Portland, the hypocrisy of white privilege, etc, come from progressive far left dominance not from Bernie.

None of those things seem to me to be "far left" in any meaningful way--they are culture war issues. I'm not exactly sure what "progressive" means any more, but those are issues of the educated liberal elite faction of the party, which is not "far left"

lucypevensie · 2025-08-03T09:23:28-0500

German Shepherds need purpose.

WORK

Akita Suggagaki · 2025-08-03T09:22:27-0500

I think Home - Senator Elissa Slotkin would do well if people could elect a woman.

wing2000 · 2025-08-03T09:17:48-0500

ozso said:
I don't know what that means.

It means you would prefer to automatically accept the "official" talking point -- she was a Biden appointee therefore she must be bad -- then actually examine her background, qualifications and past support by member of both parties.

Hentenza · 2025-08-03T09:16:21-0500

rambot said:
I'm pretty sure there are a few right wingers who don't really think much of Trump too.
Not sure I'd they call themselves republican though.

Yep. Far left or far right are equally bad. This thread is about far left though.

Hentenza · 2025-08-03T09:14:26-0500

BCP1928 said:
Except that the far left doesn't dominate. The Berniecrat crowd can hardly get a word in edgewise. The globalist elite and their culture war sex stuff have been running the show.

Nah. We are going to disagree. Failed policies like defund the police, soft on crime, the erosion of parental rights, the legalization of hard drugs that killed thousands in Portland, the hypocrisy of white privilege, etc, come from progressive far left dominance not from Bernie.

Always in His Presence · 2025-08-03T09:12:43-0500

wing2000 said:
No, we don't need to rehash your denial.

Are you referring to the linked facts already presented?

wing2000 said:
It's basic commmen sense: Operational information should only be shared on secure systems. A personal mobile phone is not a secure system.

Thanks for your opinion -

rambot · 2025-08-03T09:11:29-0500

I'm pretty sure there are a few right wingers who don't really think much of Trump too.
Not sure I'd they call themselves republican though.

Latest activity

Latest activity

Interior Ends Preferential Treatment for Unreliable, Subsidy-Dependent Wind and Solar Energy​

Filter

Forum statistics

Share this page

Interior Ends Preferential Treatment for Unreliable, Subsidy-Dependent Wind and Solar Energy