Answer the Question with a Question (6)
- By bbbbbbb
- Recreation Room
- 22373 Replies
Do lawyers and politicians actually think?
Upvote
0
No he didn't. He was going to be ousted. The easy way or the hard way.Don't be silly. Of course he had a choice.
He did up until the last second. He kept telling everyone he wasn't dropping out. He finally had no choice. Resign ir face tge full embarrassing ouster.'. He could have chosen to dig his heels in.
This means the party didn't want him. It was either stay for his own ambition or leave so the party didn't have to come out and get rid of him in front of everyone.But he saw that he had to sacrifice his personal ambition for the good of his party. Which means for the good of the country.
No it didn't. He was in it and had to be threatened in order for him to get out. He didn't think his time was up until about 5 minutes before he dropped out. It didn't take guts, it took threats.cannot, obviously, have been an easy decision. To say, to admit publicly, 'Hey, I guess I'm not good enough now. My time is up. We need someone better'. It took guts.
No, you kind of skipped that part.I said if they did it right? Arrested.and deported if they did it. That takes due process.
And again, I'd like to remind you that we have so very many of them recorded in the NT with Jesus and the Apostles that it's highly unlikely to the point of being impossible that it was all a lie, or was all just a bunch of lies, or was just a complete and total fabrication or deception, or was all just made up, etc.
I see that you bought into the narrative about Matt Gaetz.As I said, it wasn't only stupid and morally depraved people who did it. They were just the leaders.
You can't refute that no believers are on Earth during the 6th seal, though "everyone" is present for the 6th seal, and all behave as unbelievers would only behave.We know who and where to tribes of Judah and Benjamin, plus some of Levi, are now.
But where and who are the millions of the 10 Northern tribes?
I will inform you: They are the Christian peoples, scattered among the nations; soon to be gathered as many Prophesies say and when we arrive in the holy Land, we will all be assigned to a tribe according to our individual characteristics. Isaiah 11:11-12
Movies are an illustration. Nefarious was reviewed by exorcists and found to be a reasonable portrayal of what a demon would say and has saidNot exactly a great source of theological wisdom, movies.
The Bible and the Catechism of the Catholic Church and other doctrinal documents specific to your denomination are far more reliable in almost any case I can think of.
It was a metaphor.Is holding a gun to someone's head the only way that you think someone can be "forced"?
Ignorance is bliss in that regard, yea.You might have that poster on ignore.
No, I am an independent and fairly lonely thinker, whose beliefs do not include wild theories such as a rapture to heaven and the crackpot idea we are in the Millennium now.
The sequence of Revelation as given, with the 7 Seals, 7 Trumpets and the 7 Bowls, culminating in the glorious return, is inviolate. We have been since the 1st Century; at the Fifth Seal and are now very close to the Day when the Lord will reset our civilization to a similar extent as He did in the days of Noah.
No, but I also suspect far less of the politicians who use the phrase see a riot directly ensue, specifically the storming of the capitol.And again, I wonder how many politicians have ever uttered the phrase "fight like hell". I suspect the answer is >0. Do you think that all politicians that say "fight like hell" are inciting physical violence?
Please pay attention to what I said: "What didn't happen was a constant barrage, from the President of the United States directly, that the election was stolen."You must be joking. There was indeed a "constant barrage" of people saying the election was stolen, and that Trump was an "illegitimate President", including from the candidate that lost. Here it is again in case you missed it the first time.
True enough. But, how many of those people gave a speech practically in front of the White House that sparked a riot where people stormed the capitol and, among other things, threatened to hang the Vice President of the United States? I'm guessing not many.True. There is not a single shred of evidence that Trump "stole" the election in 2016, but that didn't stop the losing candidate and all of her standard bearers from repeating the accusation over and over (and over and over) again.
Downplaying or ignoring the significant differences doesn't make them go away.Not nearly as many as you're suggesting.
I don't think the law is going to be a good example for showing a free will. If God told you to do these laws or die wouldn't that qualify as an outside or divine influence?Do we really have free will? Or do we really have free choice?
Free will is defined as having the ability to make choices, on our own, without any outside influences, including divine. Free choice is the ability to choose a choice that has been presented to you. Such as "I call heaven and earth to record this day against you this day I have set before you life and death, choose life, that both you and your seed may live. (Duet. 30:19)
Oh believe me, she is nominated. Just not formally.I hope she’s not nominated, and if she’s nominated, I hope she loses.
An excellent motto to combat the morons like Tucker Carlson that I'm arguing against with my sarcasm."Let me write the songs of the world; and I'll care not who writes its laws"
But is was your interpretation that “maggots” could have referred to people from a political party that you believe to be in league with the bad guy from the Bible.Wasn't my headline.
Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John are not just code words for anonymous and unreliable authors.
Most of us take for granted that the Gospels according to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John were in fact written by Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, respectively. In times past, this would have been the obvious assumption, and questioning this assumption would have been seen as an absurd waste of time.
However, no assumption is safe today, and the identity of the authors of the Gospels is now hotly debated by some scholars.
So let’s take a look at this question. Who did write the Gospels? And why does it matter?
Briefly, we should begin by setting the parameters of the question. When talking about who wrote the Gospels, we should clarify whichgospels we are talking about. There are only four canonical Gospels, those purported to be written by Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, which are considered authentically part of the New Testament by all Christians the world over. There are a great number of so-called “gospels.” Among others, there are the “Gospel of Judas,” the “Gospel of Mary,” the “Gospel of Thomas,” the “Gospel of Philip,” the Protoevangelium of James, and many more.
These are all recognized as having been written a century or more after the death of Jesus, sometimes several centuries later, and not attributable to those closest disciples of Our Lord, or even to their disciples. While these facts in and of themselves do not mean that they are unreliable historical records, we know that the authors were not divinely inspired, as the Church has discerned and declared the canon of Sacred Scripture, and the canon is closed. Scripture is public revelation from God, and such public revelation ceased with the death of the last apostle (see Dei Verbum 4, CCC 66-67, 73). So these so-called “gospels,” though they may be historically interesting documents, are not part of that canon. The authorship of those documents is not at issue here.
Continued below.
![]()
Who Really Wrote the Gospels?
Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John are not just code words for anonymous and unreliable authors of the Gospels. They were real people, divinely inspired.www.catholic.com