Hmm. When something is classified as "materially misleading",
This is standard cherry-picking. Just rinse and repeat those adjectives one wants to highlight - without actually referring to what those adjectives described. Footage of Fox News reporters at a Trump rally without context. Failing to mention Social Media.
Dude - Sky News IS Australia's version of Fox. If they had more serious objections to extract from the 60 page PDF from ACMA - don't you think they would have shared it?
Otherwise, the ABC's reporting about Trump spreading the Big Lie, the ties with FOX, and the horrific outcomes on Jan 06 all stand.
Oh - and what were the correspondingly urgent documentaries about Hillary's "Big Lie"?
There were none - because the Russian hacking of her emails
happened.
The $10 million Russian payments to Social Media influencers
happened.
It's hard to quantify what the actual effect was and how many votes might have shifted due to these and other factors - but these are historical facts.
But hey - just cherry pick your own version of reality and repeat "See! They're the same! They've BOTH LOST THE PLOT!"
And just keep reasserting how you don't focus on 'gradations'.
Uh, no.
History is judging MAGA and Trump.
The world is watching.
We saw.
We know.