• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Trump knocking down historic East Wing to build Ballroom - is this LEGAL?

Did you understand what I wrote about it being vague enough to be consistent with a lot of different plans?

Aside from complete destruction, that line is also consistent with the East Wing being heavily modified; it remaining and being incorporated into the new building; and the new building being appended onto it
Okay, then what's all the hulabaloo about?
The only way it's "obvious" is with hindsight and with giving him the benefit of the doubt. It was not at all obvious to anybody at the time, which is why everybody was surprised.
If anyone at the time actually cared enough about this topic to listen to his press conference, I assume they'd have been interested enough to read the short press release. You can't replace part of something without touching that part. This is just after-the-fact manufactured hulabaloo courtesy of the usual Trump-hating industrial complex.
lol, seriously? He lies constantly. It's one of his defining characteristics.
I almost posted about this response because I anticipated it. The obnoxious logical fallacy of "he must be lying because he always lies".
Upvote 0

Why Christianity

Do you see any good fruit from Islam? Eastern religions you have tried. Do you need love are you hurting. The Bible would inform you much. And Judaism has zeal ‘but without knowledge. Only Jesus said the truth will set you free. He is the truth. For the human He is complete. Not trying to put everyone else down but to give you some perspective on the other god believing and not religions. And I don’t think you want religion. But peace with God.
Upvote 0

Not Woke! Awakened! A Welcome Event

If we all are going to be honest, the Biden administration was more fascist than Trump's second term.
Yeah. You can't just "both sides did it too" unless you're going to actually compare useful stats that also address the frequency of trumps disconcerting proclamations.

Huh. like how hes bypassing congress for the atracks on drug boats? Or all of his executive orders.
Or like how he praises tyrants and says he wants to emulate them.
Or how he's empowered a prejudice police force that covers it's face and challenges people based just on skin colour?
I mean, people were arrested for not wearing masks on an empty beach.
You mean when Trump was president?

Paddle boarder chased by boat, arrested in Malibu after flouting coronavirus closures

Besides wasn't that a state issue?
Upvote 0

Censorship?

There are, admittedly, missteps in church history. But let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater by painting things with such broad and inflexible brush. Especially not by mischaracterizing and misrepresenting what took place to fit a narrative.
I have begun and do intend to greatly broaden the brush unto proper factual narrative, established by the Vatican itself throughout history, in her own words. This isn't just a blame game, but rather an investigation into motives of and teachings unto effect. There is plenty wrong to be addressed with all human institutions granted they are around long enough to be infected with the plenty of wrong existing within each one of us. This discussion has nothing to do with anyone being any better than anyone else, as none actually are. We are all infected with sin, and in desperate need of salvation.
Upvote 0

Is being a jerk a good evangelism strategy?

Being a jerk is seldom a good strategy in any occasion.

This is one of the bad things about social media in general. This site is a relativity safe place for Christians of different denominations and different stages in their journey to share and discuss things thanks to the mods and the community.

Broader social media in general (X, Reddit, Facebook / Meta, TicTock, etc).. no so much.

It should probably be different, but it really isn't. No matter how you practice your Christian faith, there will always be another person identifying as a Christian, somewhere, that cannot wait to tell you, at length, often with a degree of venom and volume that, "YOU ARE DOING IT WRONG!!"....in love..of course.
  • Agree
Reactions: Michie
Upvote 0

Chicago principal claims teacher who made sick Charlie Kirk gesture is the victim

If there's a flaw in my logic, let's see it.
Not so much a flaw in logic. You're just very confused and confusing.
Accountability. I have socio-political beliefs similar to Kirk's. I would not feel safe working around co-workers who think it's okay to murder me in front of my family.

Did anyone make such a statement (other than Kirk)?

I never heard Kirk say that. I said it. I'm pretty sure everyone would agree with me, though.
Upvote 0

Censorship?

16. The Church has always taken action to destroy the plague of bad books. This was true even in apostolic times for we read that the apostles themselves burned a large number of books.[23] It may be enough to consult the laws of the fifth Council of the Lateran on this matter and the Constitution which Leo X published afterwards lest “that which has been discovered advantageous for the increase of the faith and the spread of useful arts be converted to the contrary use and work harm for the salvation of the faithful.”[24] This also was of great concern to the fathers of Trent, who applied a remedy against this great evil by publishing that wholesome decree concerning the Index of books which contain false doctrine.[25] “We must fight valiantly,” Clement XIII says in an encyclical letter about the banning of bad books, “as much as the matter itself demands and must exterminate the deadly poison of so many books; for never will the material for error be withdrawn, unless the criminal sources of depravity perish in flames.”[26] Thus it is evident that this Holy See has always striven, throughout the ages, to condemn and to remove suspect and harmful books. The teaching of those who reject the censure of books as too heavy and onerous a burden causes immense harm to the Catholic people and to this See. They are even so depraved as to affirm that it is contrary to the principles of law, and they deny the Church the right to decree and to maintain it.

Did Jesus or His apostles really teach the banning and burning of books? Is it not most obvious that the Catholic church did and does condone censorship and the burning of books, which included all translations of the bible she did not approve of? Does the above declaration not conclusively state that the papacy should have the right to decree and maintain book banning and burning?

17. We have learned that certain teachings are being spread among the common people in writings which attack the trust and submission due to princes; the torches of treason are being lit everywhere. Care must be taken lest the people, being deceived, are led away from the straight path. May all recall, according to the admonition of the apostle that “there is no authority except from God; what authority there is has been appointed by God. Therefore he who resists authority resists the ordinances of God; and those who resist bring on themselves condemnation.”[27] Therefore both divine and human laws cry out against those who strive by treason and sedition to drive the people from confidence in their princes and force them from their government…………

19. These beautiful examples of the unchanging subjection to the princes necessarily proceeded from the most holy precepts of the Christian religion. They condemn the detestable insolence and improbity of those who, consumed with the unbridled lust for freedom, are entirely devoted to impairing and destroying all rights of dominion while bringing servitude to the people under the slogan of liberty. Here surely belong the infamous and wild plans of the Waldensians, the Beghards, the Wycliffites, and other such sons of Belial, who were the sores and disgrace of the human race; they often received a richly deserved anathema from the Holy See. For no other reason do experienced deceivers devote their efforts, except so that they, along with Luther, might joyfully deem themselves “free of all.” To attain this end more easily and quickly, they undertake with audacity any infamous plan whatever.

20. Nor can We predict happier times for religion and government from the plans of those who desire vehemently to separate the Church from the state, and to break the mutual concord between temporal authority and the priesthood. It is certain that that concord which always was favorable and beneficial for the sacred and the civil order is feared by the shameless lovers of liberty. ……………………………

Was it really better when church and state were united and all citizens were subject to people whose authority they had nothing to do with establishing over them? Who were abused and even killed by these authorities of disobeying them? Popes, priests, and clergy lorded over them, without any input or consent by them. Kings, Queens, and royalty established by birth and or favor, without the consent or favor of those whom they lorded themselves over? Nor most obviously, any measure of character or even common decency as a great many of them repeatedly demonstrated throughout history? Is not all of the above exactly what democracies and Constitutional governments for and by the people were established to overcome and prevent? Did not these very forms of government arise in the battle against united Papal and monarchial abuses of the dark ages Feudalism of Europe? Directly connected to the Protestant Reformation and or Rationalist movements of many people seeking relief from oppressive united Papal and Monarchial governments? Yes to all of the above.

23. May Our dear sons in Christ, the princes, support these Our desires for the welfare of Church and State with their resources and authority. May they understand that they received their authority not only for the government of the world, but especially for the defense of the Church. They should diligently consider that whatever work they do for the welfare of the Church accrues to their rule and peace. Indeed let them persuade themselves that they owe more to the cause of the faith than to their kingdom. Let them consider it something very great for themselves as We say with Pope St. Leo, “if in addition to their royal diadem the crown of faith may be added.” Placed as if they were parents and teachers of the people, they will bring them true peace and tranquility, if they take special care that religion and piety remain safe. God, after all, calls Himself “King of kings and Lord of lords.”

24. That all of this may come to pass prosperously and happily, let Us raise Our eyes and hands to the most holy Virgin Mary, who alone crushes all heresies, and is Our greatest reliance and the whole reason for Our hope.[33] May she implore by her patronage a successful outcome for Our plans and actions. Let Us humbly ask of the Prince of the Apostles, Peter and his co-apostle Paul that all of you may stand as a wall lest a foundation be laid other than that which has already been laid. Relying on this happy hope, We trust that the Author and Crown of Our faith Jesus Christ will console Us in all these Our tribulations. We lovingly impart the apostolic benediction to you, venerable brothers, and to the sheep committed to your care as a sign of heavenly aid.

Given in Rome at St. Mary Major, on August 15, the feast of the Assumption of the Virgin, in the year of Our Lord 1832, the second year of Our Pontificate.

Have all governments and earthly authorities received such by God for the defense of Roman Catholicism? Do they owe more to the papacy than to their own nations and or citizens? Is the papacy not still to this very day commanding these very same things by continually supporting and calling for the submission of all nations to international organizations of unelected officials, over and above the wishes and desires of their own citizens? Yes she is, as will be demonstrated by her own words many times over on this thread, God willing. This is not to mention her support of internet, news, and social media censorship as well.

Should it be any surprise that an institution promoting and supporting such sentiments as those quoted above, should have forbidden a great many books and translations of the bible according to the dictates of the institutions own corporate conscience and in violation of a great many others, corporate or individual?
Yes it should, as such sentiments are more in line with the following Catholic proclamations as well.


“Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is absolutely necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman Pontiff.”(Unam Sanctam)

’If Catholics ever attain, which they surely will, though at a distant day, the immense numerical majority in the United States, religious liberty, as at present understood, will be at an end. So say our enemies; so say we.’ (Our Sunday Visitor, pg. 3, Apr. 18, 1915)

Am I a bigot for quoting, addressing, and stating my opinions regarding the above quotes from actual documents? Should I be censored for doing so? I guess we shall see. The above is just the first exhibit of the many examples revealing a spirit and attitude which most obviously would and does support censorship simply for disagreement, not actual and real harmful content. In any case, obviously the Vatican continued a manner and spirit supportive of censorship even of holy scripture they claimed was dangerous well into the 1800's.
Upvote 0

Censorship?

The following excerpts are taken from the first papal encyclical after the French Revolution, during which time the French people rejected the authority of the Catholic Church, their Catholic monarchy, and religion altogether. Which included the removal of the present Pope into exile, and the disbanding of the Vatican. They reveal her new efforts to undo all that the masses effected in their wholesale rejection of her usurped authority just over three decades prior to its publication. Some of those she considers enemies of this desired purpose are identified in the encyclical as well. The link provided above the quoted excerpts, is where the encyclical may be viewed in its entirety. Emphasis is mine, my comments are in blue.

Mirari Vos - Papal Encyclicals

Mirari Vos

On Liberalism and Religious Indifferentism

Pope Gregory XVI - 1832

ON LIBERALISM AND RELIGIOUS INDIFFERENTISM


To All Patriarchs, Primates, Archbishops, and Bishops of the Catholic World.
Venerable Brothers, Greetings and Apostolic Benediction.​

We think that you wonder why, from the time of Our assuming the pontificate, We have not yet sent a letter to you as is customary and as Our benevolence for you demanded. We wanted very much to address you by that voice by which We have been commanded, in the person of blessed Peter, to strengthen the brethren.[1] You know what storms of evil and toil, at the beginning of Our pontificate, drove Us suddenly into the depths of the sea. If the right hand of God had not given Us strength, We would have drowned as the result of the terrible conspiracy of impious men. The mind recoils from renewing this by enumerating so many dangers; instead We bless the Father of consolation Who, having overthrown all enemies, snatched Us from the present danger. When He had calmed this violent storm, He gave Us relief from fear. At once We decided to advise you on healing the wounds of Israel; but the mountain of concerns We needed to address in order to restore public order delayed Us…………………

Is the Catholic church the New Covenant Israel?

4. We come to you grieving and sorrowful because We know that you are concerned for the faith in these difficult times. Now is truly the time in which the powers of darkness winnow the elect like wheat.[3] “The earth mourns and fades away….And the earth is infected by the inhabitants thereof, because they have transgressed the laws, they have changed the ordinances, they have broken the everlasting covenant.”[4]

Whose laws had they transgressed, and whose "everlasting" covenant had they broken? Is disobeying the Catholic church, and breaking covenant with it, disobeying and breaking the everlasting covenant with God?

5. We speak of the things which you see with your own eyes, which We both bemoan. Depravity exults; science is impudent; liberty, dissolute. The holiness of the sacred is despised; the majesty of divine worship is not only disapproved by evil men, but defiled and held up to ridicule. Hence sound doctrine is perverted and errors of all kinds spread boldly. The laws of the sacred, the rights, institutions, and discipline — none are safe from the audacity of those speaking evil. Our Roman See is harassed violently and the bonds of unity are daily loosened and severed. The divine authority of the Church is opposed and her rights shorn off. She is subjected to human reason and with the greatest injustice exposed to the hatred of the people and reduced to vile servitude. The obedience due bishops is denied and their rights are trampled underfoot. Furthermore, academies and schools resound with new, monstrous opinions, which openly attack the Catholic faith; this horrible and nefarious war is openly and even publicly waged. Thus, by institutions and by the example of teachers, the minds of the youth are corrupted and a tremendous blow is dealt to religion and the perversion of morals is spread. So the restraints of religion are thrown off, by which alone kingdoms stand. We see the destruction of public order, the fall of principalities, and the overturning of all legitimate power approaching. Indeed this great mass of calamities had its inception in the heretical societies and sects in which all that is sacrilegious, infamous, and blasphemous has gathered as bilge water in a ship’s hold, a congealed mass of all filth.

6. These and many other serious things, which at present would take too long to list, but which you know well, cause Our intense grief. It is not enough for Us to deplore these innumerable evils unless We strive to uproot them. We take refuge in your faith and call upon your concern for the salvation of the Catholic flock. Your singular prudence and diligent spirit give Us courage and console Us, afflicted as We are with so many trials. We must raise Our voice and attempt all things lest a wild boar from the woods should destroy the vineyard or wolves kill the flock. It is Our duty to lead the flock only to the food which is healthful. In these evil and dangerous times, the shepherds must never neglect their duty; they must never be so overcome by fear that they abandon the sheep. Let them never neglect the flock and become sluggish from idleness and apathy. Therefore, united in spirit, let us promote our common cause, or more truly the cause of God; let our vigilance be one and our effort united against the common enemies.

7. Indeed you will accomplish this perfectly if, as the duty of your office demands, you attend to yourselves and to doctrine and meditate on these words: “the universal Church is affected by any and every novelty”[5] and the admonition of Pope Agatho: “nothing of the things appointed ought to be diminished; nothing changed; nothing added; but they must be preserved both as regards expression and meaning.”[6] Therefore may the unity which is built upon the See of Peter as on a sure foundation stand firm. May it be for all a wall and a security, a safe port, and a treasury of countless blessings.[7] To check the audacity of those who attempt to infringe upon the rights of this Holy See or to sever the union of the churches with the See of Peter, instill in your people a zealous confidence in the papacy and sincere veneration for it. As St. Cyprian wrote: “He who abandons the See of Peter on which the Church was founded, falsely believes himself to be a part of the Church.”[8]…………………….

Is the cause of Roman Catholicism the cause of God? Are all those who oppose her congealed masses of heretical filth? Are they blasphemous for doing so? Are all those who seek to separate themsleves from the Church of Rome audacious, infamous, bilge waters in ships holds?



9. Furthermore, the discipline sanctioned by the Church must never be rejected or be branded as contrary to certain principles of natural law. It must never be called crippled, or imperfect or subject to civil authority. In this discipline the administration of sacred rites, standards of morality, and the reckoning of the rights of the Church and her ministers are embraced…………

13. Now We consider another abundant source of the evils with which the Church is afflicted at present: indifferentism. This perverse opinion is spread on all sides by the fraud of the wicked who claim that it is possible to obtain the eternal salvation of the soul by the profession of any kind of religion, as long as morality is maintained. Surely, in so clear a matter, you will drive this deadly error far from the people committed to your care. With the admonition of the apostle that “there is one God, one faith, one baptism”[16] may those fear who contrive the notion that the safe harbor of salvation is open to persons of any religion whatever. They should consider the testimony of Christ Himself that “those who are not with Christ are against Him,”[17] and that they disperse unhappily who do not gather with Him. Therefore “without a doubt, they will perish forever, unless they hold the Catholic faith whole and inviolate.”[18] Let them hear Jerome who, while the Church was torn into three parts by schism, tells us that whenever someone tried to persuade him to join his group he always exclaimed: “He who is for the See of Peter is for me.”[19] A schismatic flatters himself falsely if he asserts that he, too, has been washed in the waters of regeneration. Indeed Augustine would reply to such a man: “The branch has the same form when it has been cut off from the vine; but of what profit for it is the form, if it does not live from the root?”[20]

14. This shameful font of indifferentism gives rise to that absurd and erroneous proposition which claims that liberty of conscience must be maintained for everyone. It spreads ruin in sacred and civil affairs, though some repeat over and over again with the greatest impudence that some advantage accrues to religion from it. “But the death of the soul is worse than freedom of error,” as Augustine was wont to say.[21] When all restraints are removed by which men are kept on the narrow path of truth, their nature, which is already inclined to evil, propels them to ruin. Then truly “the bottomless pit”[22] is open from which John saw smoke ascending which obscured the sun, and out of which locusts flew forth to devastate the earth. Thence comes transformation of minds, corruption of youths, contempt of sacred things and holy laws — in other words, a pestilence more deadly to the state than any other. Experience shows, even from earliest times, that cities renowned for wealth, dominion, and glory perished as a result of this single evil, namely immoderate freedom of opinion, license of free speech, and desire for novelty.

15. Here We must include that harmful and never sufficiently denounced freedom to publish any writings whatever and disseminate them to the people, which some dare to demand and promote with so great a clamor. We are horrified to see what monstrous doctrines and prodigious errors are disseminated far and wide in countless books, pamphlets, and other writings which, though small in weight, are very great in malice. We are in tears at the abuse which proceeds from them over the face of the earth. Some are so carried away that they contentiously assert that the flock of errors arising from them is sufficiently compensated by the publication of some book which defends religion and truth. Every law condemns deliberately doing evil simply because there is some hope that good may result. Is there any sane man who would say poison ought to be distributed, sold publicly, stored, and even drunk because some antidote is available and those who use it may be snatched from death again and again?

Should the Catholic Church never be subject to the authorities of the many nations she exists within? Will all perish who do not hold the catholic faith whole and inviolate? Are claims of liberty of conscience for all, indifferentism, erroneous, and absurd propositions? Is freedom to publish one's beliefs freely for all who care to read such, harmful and to be denounced? Does the Catholic church have the right to do so, while denying to all others she wishes? Is all such declaration not at exact variance the Declaration of Independence and Constitution of The United States of America? This dress to be continued in the next post.
Upvote 0

There’s a Giant Flaw in Human History

@stevevw, the main problem I and many others have with your claim is the same problem we have with many such conspiracy theories: that your leaps of logic are too damn big!

You go from "Oh, we can't find any evidence of them using simple tools" and then absolutely shoot right to "Therefore, they must have had such super advanced tech that no-one knows about! Even though there's not a shred of physical or artistic reference of it at all, that must be the case!".

How is anyone NOT going to be skeptical of such a claim?
Upvote 0

In Luke 4 does Jesus know He is God and does Satan?

For God to be certain is an great absolute. Satan has a finite memory and field of vision. I think he could see some way into spirits and tell much of who they were. Maybe remembering things about them and today too, Satan remembers us. The fullness of the Godhead dwelling bodily would stand out to him.
Upvote 0

Chicago principal claims teacher who made sick Charlie Kirk gesture is the victim

This wasn't a red state rally, this was in Chicago.

Cook County is one of the deepest blue counties in the country (over 84% Democratic)
This lady was a public school teacher (who across the board, heavily lean toward the progressive side)


She's also holding a Mexican Flag, right next to a sign that says "worst president ever"
View attachment 372047

Seems like if presented with the options of "this person takes the leftist position on almost every issue that comes down the pike" vs. "this is a moderate person, who just doesn't like the way Trump conducts business"

The overwhelming Vegas odds would be on the former.
OK,but it's hard for me to take it seriously when you and others in this discussion want to brand everybody who was there as a left wing extremist. on all issues because for you "left wingt extremist" means anybody who disagrees with you about anything, especially about sex.
Upvote 0

There’s a Giant Flaw in Human History

This article in no way is evidence that the Egyptians used copper saws, sand and water. In fact it begins by telling us that absolutely no evidence has been found for any stone cutting saws.

In ancient Egyptian art no representations have been found of the sawing of stone by means of a copper blade and an abrasive (Lucas & Harris 1962, Stocks 1999), nor has any lapidary slabbing saw been found in the archaeological record (Arnold 1991).

It talks about the small hand saws (40cm) for carpentry which are depicted on the walls and we have found examples like above.

But when it comes to evidence for stone cutting there is no evidence of saws but and the article states that any suggestion of cutting with massive copper saws is inferred by the marks on the stones ie

The use of saws as a method of cutting rock is inferred from marks observed on ancient Egyptian stonework,

That's exactly what I am doing. So why is it ok for the article to infer without any evidence that these marks are made by giant copper saws that have never been found by what the marks on the stones look like.

But not ok for anyone to infer that whatever cut the stones was not a massive copper saw thats never been found. Because the same marks don't look like a big copper saw cut them.

Both are inferred. Its just a case of which is closest to matching a big copper saw with abrasion. Or some other method that left marks that look like machining.

Because your leap of logic to advanced technology like circular saw is in not sensible or workable, nor is there any evidence for it. Because the article knows what they're talking about and you very much do not.
Upvote 0

There’s a Giant Flaw in Human History

Oh it 100% is about context! You can't just show off any rock that's been cut and go "SEE! SEE! ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY!" It's insincere on your end and makes everyone else skeptical about your own claims.

And ancient people had saw, it's a fact, especially the Egyptian, such as this copper alloy one from the College of London.
View attachment 372042

This website even actually goes into depth on how the ancient Egyptians could have cut stones easily with the technology they had. Believe it or not, it was possible, because they did experiments that showed that it could be done.
This article in no way is evidence that the Egyptians used copper saws, sand and water. In fact it begins by telling us that absolutely no evidence has been found for any stone cutting saws.

In ancient Egyptian art no representations have been found of the sawing of stone by means of a copper blade and an abrasive (Lucas & Harris 1962, Stocks 1999), nor has any lapidary slabbing saw been found in the archaeological record (Arnold 1991).

It talks about the small hand saws (40cm) for carpentry which are depicted on the walls and we have found examples like above.

But when it comes to evidence for stone cutting there is no evidence of saws but and the article states that any suggestion of cutting with massive copper saws is inferred by the marks on the stones ie

The use of saws as a method of cutting rock is inferred from marks observed on ancient Egyptian stonework,

That's exactly what I am doing. So why is it ok for the article to infer without any evidence that these marks are made by giant copper saws that have never been found by what the marks on the stones look like.

But not ok for anyone to infer that whatever cut the stones was not a massive copper saw thats never been found. Because the same marks don't look like a big copper saw cut them.

Both are inferred. Its just a case of which is closest to matching the marks. A big copper saw with abrasion. Or some other method that left marks that look like machining.
Upvote 0

Hamas now executing Palestinians who tried to help peace.

I can consider putting myself in the place of those who lost so many relatives and friends to Israeli bombs.

How would I feel if half a dozen who collaborated with the Israelis were executed in the public square?
===========
Living thousands of miles away in an area that hasn't been invaded since 1812, the response may be clear, especially for the devout of any of our faith communities.
I believe if Hamas had the firepower of the Israelis, a second holocaust would happen. Then we have to consider what is collaboration in Hamas’ view? The Nazis had death squads that executed old men who didn’t want to fight the Soviets in the streets of burning Berlin in April 1945. That is my perception of Hamas.

I don’t know what can be done in this situation and Israel seemed to handle it’s affairs ( the victories in the 1967 & 73 wars for ex.) better before becoming a US client state under the Carter administration.

Those of us who are able can at least try to send relief aid to groups like Doctors Without Borders etc. and pray.
  • Like
Reactions: mark46
Upvote 0

I was brought to tears during The Prayers of the Rosary, today.

Yes. I was born Catholic and became a Jesus only mediator Protestant. I came back to the Catholic faith in complete humility in 2019 right before the sacraments were cut off
The scripture that goes with the glorious mystery of the Coronation is Psalm 44 Douay rhiems

. 7- Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: the sceptre of thy kingdom is a sceptre of uprightness 8 Thou hast loved justice, and hated iniquity: therefore God, thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows. 9 Myrrh and stacte and cassia perfume thy garments, from the ivory houses: out of which 10 The daughters of kings have delighted thee in thy glory. The queen stood on thy right hand, in gilded clothing; surrounded with variety.

11 Hearken, O daughter, and see, and incline thy ear: and forget thy people and thy father's house. 12 And the king shall greatly desire thy beauty; for he is the Lord thy God, and him they shall adore. 13 And the daughters of Tyre with gifts, yea, all the rich among the people, shall entreat thy countenance. 14 All the glory of the king's daughter is within in golden borders, 15 Clothed round about with varieties. After her shall virgins be brought to the king: her neighbours shall be brought to thee.

16 They shall be brought with gladness and rejoicing: they shall be brought into the temple of the king. 17 Instead of thy fathers, sons are born to thee: thou shalt make them princes over all the earth. 18 They shall remember thy name throughout all generations. Therefore shall people praise thee for ever; yea, for ever and evera and


It is such a beautiful description of the coronation. The Queen stands at the right hand of Jesus. Virgins are brought to her, they are the Nuns and women religious. Sons are born to her and made princes over all the earth. They are the priests, Bishops, Cardinals and the Pope

That brought me to tears as I had never seen it before. Also, I never understood the Canticles ( Song of Solomon) until I looked at it as describing the love between Jesus and Mary
Canticles 6:8-9

8 One is my dove, my perfect one is but one, she is the only one of her mother, the chosen of her that bore her. The daughters saw her, and declared her most blessed: the queens and concubines, and they praised her. 9 Who is she that cometh forth as the morning rising, fair as the moon, bright as the sun, terrible as an army set in array?


There’s so much beauty that it brings me to tears
Congratulations on being given the gift of tears. Enjoy the spiritual consolation, yet still pray the Rosary every day. If you miss, it is not under penalty of sin, but you do miss out on spending time with God if you do. I missed a few times, but have been building the habit over the last five years. I can only tell you it is well worth it, keep going, especially when you don’t feel like it

Peace be with you
Very informative! Thank you for taking the time to post this. Peace be with you also.
  • Like
Reactions: Michie
Upvote 0

The Mirror of the Word

Paul's statement that "I know in part" means he only has partial knowledge of God 's Word at that time, because the other writers have yet at that time to write their part; and "that which is perfect" has to do with whatever is partial, which is the Word of God incomplete. But when the Bible was completed ("perfect") we could know the entire will and desires of God; coming face to face clearly in the mirror of the Word!
I was first taught this POV in the mid 1980's. At the time it seemed to be reasonable. But now I see it as indefensible because 1) knowing in full is speaking of the day when we see Him face to face and 2) nothing in 1 Corinthians 13 indicates the completion of the Bible is in view. I now closely associate this POV with those who teach that God does not personally interact with people any more, but instead points them to the Bible if they want to know His will. Is that where you're comming from?
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,878,868
Messages
65,425,573
Members
276,406
Latest member
romansroad