Remember, this is symbolism. You don't apply the same idea. While I see your point, the rules of symbolism conflict with it. While sackcloth is an outward appearance of an inner struggle, these 2 witnesses would have to be two overcomers in general (if you set aside the white rider for a moment) because we know that crowns are given to overcomers (Church of Philadelphia as an example). God wouldn't use people who haven't overcome or won't eventually overcome, because technically that would mean they wouldn't be his. You wouldn't have 2 unsaved people running around speaking for the Lord. So the symbolic reference of the rider being adorned for glory, would be their heavenly symbolic reference, while the sackcloth and ashes are earthly.
Ah, you assume I meant that the two witnesses were initially “unsaved” - I think the contrary - They are called “the two olive trees and the two lampstands that stand before the Lord of the earth” (Rev. 11:4), directly echoing Zechariah 4:14:
“These are the two anointed ones who stand by the Lord of the whole earth” - Symbolically, the olive trees represent Spirit-empowered ministry, and the lampstands represent light-bearing testimony - so they are not only God’s anointed ones on earth, but also prophets, priests, kings, and light-bringers.
The mix-up is often assuming that overcomers do not endure suffering - their role on earth is one of grief and lamentation, much like Jeremiah, who ministered in sackcloth-like grief - Yet by faithfully completing their testimony, enduring persecution, and being raised up and vindicated by God Himself (Rev. 11:11-12), they exemplify true overcoming.
The Mantle and Role of the Two Witnesses
The mantle of Moses was that of a deliverer - he was called to free God’s people from bondage in Egypt, confronting both human rulers and spiritual powers, and leading the people toward the Promised Land. In Christian typology, this role is sometimes connected to the concept of a “second Exodus,” where God’s people are spiritually or eschatologically delivered from bondage, oppression, or apostasy. The end-times servant, like Moses, functions as an instrument of God’s deliverance - calling people out of spiritual captivity, confronting corrupt systems, and demonstrating God’s authority through both word and deed.
I think I should pre-empt and add that, typologically, the end-time servant is reflected in numerous figures throughout the Old Testament, not just Moses and Elijah. We have Jeremiah, the suffering servant in Isaiah’s songs, King David, the director of music in the Psalms, Joshua, Zerubbabel, and even mention of counsellors to assist him (more than two). While their contexts differ, their mantle is essentially the same — to bring God’s people back to Himself, proclaim His truth, and prepare the way for His restoration and kingdom purposes.
Viewing Revelation Topically vs Sequentially
I see Revelation in a similar way. I view it sequentially and parenthetically. Not necessarily chronologically, but only as a general reading.
The fall of Babylon is a good example of a parenthetical view; scripture says she falls twice. “
Fallen, fallen is Babylon the Great.” This suggests that she falls once (and then, as you say, backtracks) and falls a final time at another significant time. Another example is
Revelation 7, which I view as parenthetical, indicating what occurs during the events of
Revelation 6.
However, the imagery of the two olive trees, two lampstands, and Elijah, as a lone servant called to restore all things (Mal. 4:5), may seem contradictory when viewed topically if one connects them. Yet, this presents no issue when considered biblically, typologically, sequentially, and even chronologically.
Typologically, the end-times relationship mirrors that of Elijah and Elisha in the Old Testament:
- Elijah → Elisha
- End-times Elijah → End-times Elisha (the double portion, represented by the two witnesses)
I think your last point is valuable when considering a literal perspective versus a typological one. God sometimes sends servants in pairs, but this is not a universal requirement. The two witnesses reflect the Spirit’s empowerment and God’s pattern of paired ministry. Yet, the White Horse rider represents the broader archetype of God’s authority and restoration, not a literal pairing.