God's applicable laws are not arbitrary, you cannot pick and choose which ones you obey and which ones you ignore, you cannot pick and choose whether you commit sin or not.
This is true, as the Jesus "of the Bible" teaches, along with the the entire Law and Prophets that HE Inspired as the Word of God, and as Paul teaches both Jew and Gentile. Men are to Live by "Every Word" of God, Because HE IS God, and H
e is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him. He inspired the Holy Scriptures to be written "For our sakes no doubt", and according to Paul they are trustworthy "
for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, (As Christ Commanded) throughly furnished unto all good works"
So according to Scriptures you are right. Men are not instructed by God to Judge some of His instruction in Righteousness, as worthy of their honor and respect, while also judging some of His instruction in righteousness, as beneath them and unworthy of their honor and respect.
This was the philosophy of the mainstream religion of Paul's Time, it didn't work out so well with them. I'm not sure why someone, Jerw or Gentile, would think they could adopt the same philosophy today, and be accepted by God.
The argument fails anyway. Years later, the leaders of the church confirmed to Paul they were STILL(STILL) only asking gentiles to follow the same four laws(Acts21:25)
While a religion that only commands that men don't drink blood, or eat meat from animals that have been dispatched through strangling, or don't engage in fornication or from idolatry, might be quite seductive to some, and a great marketing strategy to grow a religious business. But I'm quite sure that Jesus Words that I posted, doesn't advocate a religion where stealing is acceptable, along with hating your brother in your heart, or killing people, or holding a grudge against them for no reason. Or coveting, or refusing to love our neighbor as ourselves, or Loving God with all your heart and soul. And a religion that preaches or implies that Jesus' teaching and Words were only for men who were born with Jewish DNA is absurd, in my view.
And if a person reads all of Paul's words, that he taught to both Jew and Gentile, it becomes perfectly clear that he didn't teach Gentiles that repentance for them only means "Yielding themselves" servants to obey the 4 commandments you are promoting.
Perhaps if men might consider the actual Word of the Jesus "of the Bible", and accept that both He and Paul directed all men, Jew and Gentile, to "Repent,
Turn to God, and "DO Works" Worthy of repentance". And that maybe, in many Pagan religions of this world God placed us in, men engage in unholy, unrighteous and unclean sexual practices, whose eating habits are judged by God as unholy and unclean. Religions where men worship images of God in the likeness of men, and create their own high days in worship of their image etc.
And the implication of this philosophy, that the Holy Scriptures are only trustworthy for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, for Jews and not ALSO for Gentiles is not only unbiblical but also absurd in my view.
Maybe these 4 things the Apostles pointed out, knowing they would find God's other instructions in righteousness through Moses as all men even you and and I have found, were more important to discern and repent of at first,
for the New Gentiles converts, than to turn away from God, and adopt the religious traditions and philosophies of the mainstream religion of Paul's time, who taught for doctrines the Commandments of men, and not God. Who full well transgressed God's commandments that they might live by their own religious traditions.
I completely disagree with your "4 Law" philosophy, based on what is actually written in Scriptures. It would be a great topic of study for those seeking honor, glory and immortality.
I hope you might re-consider the message the Spirit of Christ was sending through Acts 15.