• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Is being single, and able to handle it, a blessing?

I'm not sure what you mean by hypocrisy. I do see contradiction. "I was meant to be alone, yet I can't stand being totally alone". In my case I want to be left alone. I'm not antisocial. But at the same time I'd rather not socialize. There are a lot of reasons why someone is solitary by nature. In my case I think the reason is neurological. Either autism or nonverbal learning disorder. Or something similar. Or perhaps a combination of similar neurological disorders. Put simply, I'm solitary by nature because that's how I'm wired. Now that I'm 63 I don't really care what the reason is. It just is what it is.
I meant, people saying one thing, but doing something else completely.

I'm more worried for those that can't handle it, but want the "freedom". The internet promotes this life style but it (conveniently) left out the fact that most cannot live this way.
Upvote 0

Gavin Newsom's X feed is awesome

If the standard is that low for earning their keep, it shows just how wasteful the California state government really is with the taxpayer's dollars.
They work in the press office. They have generated a lot of positive press and a lot of hilarity from their foes. Speaking of waste, remember the LA fires last winter and how the president ordered the aquifer gates opened and wasted millions of gallons of water just for show? That was a waste on a grand scale!
Upvote 0

Newsome pushed back against Democracy to achieve his political goals

The Governor of Texas had a choice to make when asked to find 5 more seats. So did the Governor of Georgia when asked to find over 11k votes in 2021. One of these men failed their country.
Oh, now the Governer was asked to find five more seats

Total fabrication
Upvote 0

FBI raids home of John Bolton, former Trump national security advisor

...in the days leading up to raid on Bolton's home:

Until Aug. 13, Bolton had not been a target of Trump’s social media attacks for seven months — since before Trump’s inauguration in January. That changed just over a week ago, when Trump became angry at a quote from Bolton and fired off a post on Truth Social expressing his frustration.

“Putin has already won,” Bolton told The Atlantic in a story that published Aug. 12, ahead of Trump’s meeting with the Russian president in Alaska. “He is the leader of a rogue state, and he’ll get a picture on U.S. soil with the president of the United States.” The message was similar to one Bolton repeated in television appearances and on social media around the same time.

“Very unfair media is at work on my meeting with Putin,” Trump posted the morning after the Atlantic story published. “Constantly quoting fired losers and really dumb people like John Bolton, who just said that, even though the meeting is on American soil, ‘Putin has already won.’ What’s that all about? We are winning on EVERYTHING.”

That same day in the White House, a senior White House official blasted the piece, dismissing it as a story that had been sourced to anonymous European officials and saying that Trump was far more prepared for the Putin encounter than other presidents had been going into similar meetings.

Four days later, in a Sunday night Truth Social post, Trump again pointed a finger at Bolton, saying he was among the “stupid people” who were making it “much harder” for Trump to end the war by criticizing his approach to Putin.\


  • Informative
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

6,000 Years?

the context of the Flood by Moses is that it covered all the land
All that land (erets), but not the whole world (tevel). If God meant "world", He would have said so. As in the words that also describe the sky as a solid dome with window in it for rain to fall through, it's important to understand the context. God wasn't confused about the extent of the flood, or the actual nature of the sky; He was using words that would have made sense to the people of the time.
Upvote 0

Biden Appointed Judge Orders Release of ‘Teens’ Who Violently Attacked Ex-DOGE Employee Edward Coristine, AKA “Big Balls”

And as this teen has shown us, people also get attacked while trying to drive their car.
Did you miss the actual point, that since people get attacked in jail, putting them in jail while awaiting trial will not keep people from getting attacked.
I guess you've never heard of keeping dangerous people from harming more people in society after they've already been shown to be violent. What do you think this guy was locked up for? Hint: Look at the picture of the guy who was attacked.
These teenagers are not being released into the wild, but one is going to a youth shelter while the other is on home detention with a monitoring device. Trial first, jail (or whatever is deemed best) after conviction should there be a conviction. What you want is backwards - jail first, then, maybe, a trial eventually.
Upvote 0

Newsome pushed back against Democracy to achieve his political goals

Maybe for the same reason CA won't wait.

The Governor of Texas had a choice to make when asked to find 5 more seats. So did the Governor of Georgia when asked to find over 11k votes in 2021. One of these men failed their country.
  • Like
Reactions: Pommer
Upvote 0

A truly off-the-wall question.

First, to explain, after much research and praying for revelation, I personally came to the conclusion that the way to pronounce the heavenly father’s name is Yahuah.

Now, I don’t judge anyone who has a different opinion. And I know in the past, I got so many prayers answered by saying God and Jesus.

The point I am trying to make, though, is that after finding many wonderful songs and many scripture videos on YouTube that use the name Yahuah, I couldn’t help but see that the great majority, not all by any means, but a great majority of them come from Black people.

I don’t care about anyone’s race. I just find it curious and interesting that so many Black people are becoming what you could call Hebrew Roots while so often using the name Yahuah.

I’m just curious. My only guess is that many Black people have become disenchanted with mainstream Christianity, and that in their searches elsewhere, they have become as I have seen on YouTube.

Please, I am not asking for a debate on how to pronounce the name of our heavenly father. I’m not even expecting anyone to have a good theory on why this happens. But if you do have a theory, it would be interesting…

The Start of WWIII

self gratification is a mortal sin, and public self gratification is a felony.

But in the Orthodox Church we confess ourselves to be the worst of sinners before every Eucharist. I don’t know of the sins of anyone else in terms of what caused them, what mitigations exist, and so on. The only person we can be sure is a truly terrible sinner is ourselves.

Also I would note the dichotomy between mortal and venial sins is primarily a Roman Catholic concept.
Upvote 0

Illegal Immigration

At least Alligator Alcatraz has to go.


Do you mean that the conditions, methods and processes at Alligator Alcatraz should be greatly changed?
Upvote 0

Consumer Prices Will Go Down From Day One? Will Gas Prices Go Down 50% Within A Year?

With Trump, it gets worse before it gets worse.
Yes, inflation will get worse before it gets better. Almost EVERYONE agrees, including Trump.

The non-government forecasts that companies depend on show increases in the last half of the year, continuing through mid 2026, peaking at under 4%, a very manageable number.

The primary thing to remember is that this is a one-time event. Prices won't come down, but they won't increase for new tariffs either. The primary issue has been uncertainty. What is the new norm? That still needs to be worked out with several countries, including Canada and India. But that will happen by year's end, and the 2026 situation will be the new norm.
=========
The economy and we all will be able to live with and thrive in the new reality including the tariffs.
========
Trump has made many more changes that will be much, much harder to absorb and get used to.

It will be difficult to get used to the increase in measles, polio and other preventable diseases. The vaccines for the next pandemic will need to be developed in Europe. The transition of the center of scientific excellence and research out of the US will be difficult to get beyond. [Thousands of scientists and researchers are moving to Europe or are considering it]. Many fewer will come to the US

Many federal departments and functions are being gutted. Even if there was a consensus to reverse Trump's actions, it will take decades. The experienced people are moving on to other employers, Much of the responsibility for providing for the safety net is being moved to the states. Many Republican states have little interest in performing and paying for this #1 function of government.
Upvote 0

Another look at the moon landing.

The KJV mentions planets.
The King James Version (KJV) does not directly mention the word "planets," as the concept of planets as distinct celestial bodies was not understood by the people who wrote the Bible. However, biblical texts refer to "wandering stars" and potentially names like Chiun and Meni, which some commentators interpret as referring to planets, particularly Saturn. The Bible focuses on the Earth and the visible "lights" in the sky for signs, seasons, and days, viewing them from an Earth-centered perspective.
Upvote 0

Trump ‘was never inappropriate with anybody,’ Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell told DOJ

No it's just that if she said Trump was guilty of being inappropriate, then that would be fully accepted. It would be like "Ah ha even
Ghislaine Maxwell says Trump is guilty! Case closed".
You are 100% correct. With the left it is all about getting Trump. If Maxwell implicated Trump she would be a hero,
  • Agree
Reactions: ozso
Upvote 0

There’s a Giant Flaw in Human History

Its what this represents as to human thinking and belief. If for example humans were far more knowledgable and had far more sophisticated beliefs then this undermines the idea of a slow and gradual evolution from primitive to advanced.
Like I said, it's arguing against ideas that were on the ropes sixty years ago. None of this is earth shattering now. It wasn't earth shattering when Chariot of the Gods? was first published.

I don't get the point here.
Upvote 0

‘Under the Southern Cross:’ Why Australia’s bishops are renewing call to welcome migrants

Immigration to Australia has changed a lot in my life time. If you look at the paragraph below, it is clear most migrants in the first two decades after World War II were of European origin. When I was young the "White Australia" policy was in vogue, and it was quite rare to see Asians or Africans in the neighbourhood.

In response to the unprecedented influx of migrants from southern and Eastern Europe which occurred in the period between 1945 and 1965—resulting in two million migrants arriving on Australian shores in that time—the Australian Archbishops and Bishops urged Catholics to embrace their responsibility to welcome and support these new settlers, as an opportunity to “spread the Kingdom of Christ within this Continent that was once called the land of the Holy Ghost”.
But that all changed in 1973 when the Whitlam government renounced the White Australia policy. I was 19 when that took place, and I'm now a senior citizen. Prior to that about the only Asians I used to see were in Chinese restaurants.


In 1973 the Whitlam Labor government definitively renounced the White Australia policy. In its place it established a policy of multiculturalism in a nation that is now home to migrants from nearly 200 different countries.

These days a walk through our local shopping centre will reveal Indians, Chinese, Moslems from various countries, South Sea islanders, Vietnamese, Filipinos, Africans and pretty much the whole gamut of racial stereotypes. Our priest is Nigerian which would have been unthinkable in the 1960's (and probably not needed). He's pretty good so no problems there, but it demonstrates how much our society has changed.

I have a concern though with "multiculturalism". As far as I'm concerned the ethos should be "Australianism", or Australia first, no matter where they come from.

The US might have been based on open migration, although it also was mainly European until recently. But there has always been a strong sense of America first in American society. Even so there have been waves of persecution in the US against migrants from time to time.

The following article was lifted from a Chinese government source (!), but it illustrates the fact that "multiculturalism" can be pie-in-the-sky as a policy if it's not implemented with some discretion.


The United States is a nation of immigrants. Ever since colonial times, immigrants from around the world have come to the country in waves. However, the history of U.S. treatment of immigrants is one rife with inhumane tragedies such as discrimination, exclusion, arrest, detention, expulsion, and a litany of human rights abuses. Worse still, the recent years have witnessed one humanitarian disaster after another caused by the U.S. government on refugees and immigrants going to the country.
Upvote 0

Britain becomes 'western capital' for sharia law courts as 85 open throughout the UK

That's a faulty comparison. Shar'ia councils are not "civil courts" and have no legal jurisdiction in the UK. Shar'ia councils operate much like Catholic tribunals or Jewish Beth Dins. They are not part of the legal system. They can only handle civil matters, are nonbinding, and have no legal authority, unless the country they are in grants them authority.


That's easy, the state provides legal protections for women and children. Shar'ia councils are voluntary, and if someone disputes a council decision, or especially if the decision is contrary to the law of the land, they can seek assistance through the formal courts.
Quite the naive view. From the UK parliament.

“We are fortunate to live in a democracy which enshrines the principle of equality before the law and is committed to the promotion of gender equality.



However, there are increasing concerns that many women and girls in this country today are suffering from systematic religiously-sanctioned gender discrimination, with particular reference to the application of Sharia law operating as a parallel quasi-legal system.



As the then Home Secretary Theresa May has said: “There is evidence of women being ‘divorced’ under Sharia law and left in penury, wives who are forced to return to abusive relationships because Sharia councils say a husband has a right to ‘chastise’, and Sharia councils giving the testimony of a woman only half the weight of the testimony of a man”.[1]



Respect for freedom of religion and belief

“In a free society, individuals must be able to organise their affairs according to their own principles, whether religious or otherwise. However, we cannot condone situations where rulings are applied which are fundamentally incompatible with our country’s laws, values, principles and policies.



Concerns

  • Arbitration tribunals which operate according to Sharia law and discriminate against women. Examples of such rulings include: inequality in access to divorce (for men often so easy it is effectively free and unconditional); polygamy (practiced by men who havemultiple ‘wives’ and numerous children); discriminatory child custody policies and inheritance laws; and the implicit sanctioning of domestic violence.
  • Arbitration tribunals which apply Sharia law going beyond their legal remit, including addressing cases of grievous bodily harm which should come to the police and the formal legal system.
  • Sharia councils operating as ‘courts’ with apparent legal authority.
  • Muslim women being coerced into agreeing to go before a ‘Sharia court’, council or Arbitration tribunal rather than the UK courts, or lacking information regarding any alternative system.


I have submitted a Private Member’s Bill, the Arbitration and Mediation Services (Equality) Bill, which seeks to address some of these concern. Its provisions would:

  • Strengthen the duties of public bodies to ensure that women are made aware of their legal rights;
  • Strengthen the powers of the police and judiciary to protect victims of abuse;
  • Prevent the operation of a parallel legal system by outlawing any person, such as a Sharia ‘judge’, falsely claiming legal jurisdiction. “
Upvote 0

It is permissive for Christians to eat meat today

I am done talking to you about my personal experience, because you will simply dismiss it. We can stick to the biblical evidence, which anyone can verify.

Of course you are. I did not expect one who says they were unhealthy from being vegan was honestly eating, and will not admit they were not, in the way I know to be healthy, from huge studies showing it, benefits to many individuals known from their change to this way, and benefits I have that I can believe would be from this way I had for well over nine years, and while Christians are especially resistant to hearing this I was Christian as I am now and have been for well over four decades, and I thank God so often that I was not so resistant, I knew verses better even well before giving up meat and several years later the other animal products.

Aside from the massive China Study and many other studies done earlier, there are newer ones still confirming it, other than ones with corporate business interests involved and invested in results.

Vegetarians have 12% lower cancer risk and vegans 24% lower cancer risk than meat-eaters, this study finds. An analysis of 79,468 North American Seventh-day Adventists in the Adventist Health Study-2 found that, after adjusting for lifestyle and demographic factors, vegetarians had a 12% lower risk of all cancers combined and vegans had a 24% lower risk compared to nonvegetarians.

The study tracked participants for almost eight years, matching cancer cases to state and provincial registries. Reduced risk was strongest for colorectal, stomach and lymphoproliferative cancers, with vegan diets showing notable protection against breast cancer in younger women and prostate cancer in younger men. Pesco-vegetarians had significantly lower colorectal cancer risk, while lacto-ovo vegetarians showed lower lymphoma rates. Medium-frequency cancers as a group, such as melanoma, thyroid, ovarian and pancreatic, were also less common in vegetarians.

Body mass index partially explained some differences, but dietary patterns themselves appeared influential, possibly due to higher intake of fruits, vegetables, legumes and nuts, and avoidance of processed or red meats, which are linked to carcinogenic compounds. No cancer type showed increased risk in vegetarians. Researchers highlight the role of plant-based nutrients and phytochemicals in reducing inflammation, supporting immune function and improving gut health. They caution that vegan diets should be balanced to prevent nutrient gaps, particularly vitamin B12, iron and omega-3 fatty acids, which may require fortified foods or supplements.

Strengths of the study include the large vegetarian sample, long-term stable diets, validated dietary measures and minimal confounding from smoking or alcohol. Limitations include reliance on baseline diet data, relatively small numbers for rare cancers and the observational design, which cannot confirm causation.

Source: Fraser, Gary E., et al. "Longitudinal Associations Between Vegetarian Dietary Habits and Site-Specific Cancers in the Adventist Health Study-2 North American cohort." The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2025).

Of course, I am always talking about the healthy way, not just anyway of avoiding animal products.

This was already addressed. Those instances had various readings extant, so we know there is a variant reading. You are alleging changes where no reading that you advocate for exists. Those are not the same at all.



This is admitting the lack of evidence.

And there is no reason to think that this was added. The early church father witnesses to the fish reading show these readings were early.



The only folks with an interest in doing so would be those ideologically opposed to eating fish. And "I heard" is not evidence.

But perhaps you should spell out how that works. I am interested to know how the fishermen-turned-disciple John, for instance, didn't know how to describe what a fish was without confusing people.



This has been addressed previously as well.

Mark 6:43 And they took up twelve baskets full of fragments and of the fish. (NKJV)​

Regarding Jesus' later statement, try reading contextually. The discussion was that they didn't bring bread, and He pointed out bread was not an issue. He also made a play on the bread with the yeast of the pharisees.

Mark 8:13-21 13 And He left them, and getting into the boat again, departed to the other side. 14 Now the disciples had forgotten to take bread, and they did not have more than one loaf with them in the boat. 15 Then He charged them, saying, “Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and the leaven of Herod.”​
16 And they reasoned among themselves, saying, “It is because we have no bread.”​
17 But Jesus, being aware of it, said to them, “Why do you reason because you have no bread? Do you not yet perceive nor understand? Is your heart still hardened? 18 Having eyes, do you not see? And having ears, do you not hear? And do you not remember? 19 When I broke the five loaves for the five thousand, how many baskets full of fragments did you take up?”​
They said to Him, “Twelve.”​
20 “Also, when I broke the seven for the four thousand, how many large baskets full of fragments did you take up?”​
And they said, “Seven.”​
21 So He said to them, “How is it you do not understand?”​


Didn't you just say what you could show us? Why have you not shown us? The only time you tried to your own source referenced eating fish as great, citing the example of Jesus providing it.

If you want to post evidence, put your primary source material, with links to it so we can all view it.

I have posted various church father quotes, with links, and various Bible texts, and you have not responded, other than to claim that all of the texts were doctored--but we have no record of it in the form of manuscripts without meat in those sections.

Here are some of the texts you are claiming were doctored:

Genesis 9:1-7 1 So God blessed Noah and his sons, and said to them: “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth. 2 And the fear of you and the dread of you shall be on every beast of the earth, on every bird of the air, on all that move on the earth, and on all the fish of the sea. They are given into your hand. 3 Every moving thing that lives shall be food for you. I have given you all things, even as the green herbs. 4 But you shall not eat flesh with its life, that is, its blood.​
Deuteronomy 12:15 “However, you may slaughter and eat meat within all your gates, whatever your heart desires, according to the blessing of the Lord your God which He has given you; the unclean and the clean may eat of it, of the gazelle and the deer alike.​
Deuteronomy 11:15 And I will send grass in your fields for your livestock, that you may eat and be filled.’​
Exodus 12:8 8 Then they shall eat the flesh on that night; roasted in fire, with unleavened bread and with bitter herbs they shall eat it. (NKJV)​
Leviticus 7:31 And the priest shall burn the fat on the altar, but the breast shall be Aaron’s and his sons’. 32 Also the right thigh you shall give to the priest as a heave offering from the sacrifices of your peace offerings. 33 He among the sons of Aaron, who offers the blood of the peace offering and the fat, shall have the right thigh for his part. 34 For the breast of the wave offering and the thigh of the heave offering I have taken from the children of Israel, from the sacrifices of their peace offerings, and I have given them to Aaron the priest and to his sons from the children of Israel by a statute forever.’ ”​
Leviticus 19:5 ‘And if you offer a sacrifice of a peace offering to the Lord, you shall offer it of your own free will. 6 It shall be eaten the same day you offer it, and on the next day. And if any remains until the third day, it shall be burned in the fire.​
1Ki 17:6 And the ravens brought him bread and meat in the morning, and bread and meat in the evening, and he drank from the brook.​
Joh 21:12 Jesus saith unto them, Come and dine. And none of the disciples durst ask him, Who art thou? knowing that it was the Lord. 13 Jesus then cometh, and taketh bread, and giveth them, and fish likewise.​
Luke 22:14 When the hour had come, He sat down, and the twelve apostles with Him. 15 Then He said to them, “With fervent desire I have desired to eat this Passover with you before I suffer​
Matthew 15:35 So He commanded the multitude to sit down on the ground. 36 And He took the seven loaves and the fish and gave thanks, broke them and gave them to His disciples; and the disciples gave to the multitude. 37 So they all ate and were filled, and they took up seven large baskets full of the fragments that were left.​
Luk 11:11 If a son shall ask bread of any of you that is a father, will he give him a stone? or if he ask a fish, will he for a fish give him a serpent? 12 Or if he shall ask an egg, will he offer him a scorpion? 13 If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your children: how much more shall your heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to them that ask him?​
Deuteronomy 14:22 “You shall truly tithe all the increase of your grain that the field produces year by year. 23 And you shall eat before the Lord your God, in the place where He chooses to make His name abide, the tithe of your grain and your new wine and your oil, of the firstborn of your herds and your flocks, that you may learn to fear the Lord your God always. 24 But if the journey is too long for you, so that you are not able to carry the tithe, or if the place where the Lord your God chooses to put His name is too far from you, when the Lord your God has blessed you, 25 then you shall exchange it for money, take the money in your hand, and go to the place which the Lord your God chooses. 26 And you shall spend that money for whatever your heart desires: for oxen or sheep, for wine or similar drink, for whatever your heart desires; you shall eat there before the Lord your God, and you shall rejoice, you and your household. 27 You shall not forsake the Levite who is within your gates, for he has no part nor inheritance with you.​
Deuteronomy 15:19 “All the firstborn males that come from your herd and your flock you shall sanctify to the Lord your God; you shall do no work with the firstborn of your herd, nor shear the firstborn of your flock. 20 You and your household shall eat it before the Lord your God year by year in the place which the Lord chooses​
Deuteronomy 12:20 “When the Lord your God enlarges your border as He has promised you, and you say, ‘Let me eat meat,’ because you long to eat meat, you may eat as much meat as your heart desires.​
Luke 15:20-24 20 “And he arose and came to his father. But when he was still a great way off, his father saw him and had compassion, and ran and fell on his neck and kissed him. 21 And the son said to him, ‘Father, I have sinned against heaven and in your sight, and am no longer worthy to be called your son.’ 22 “But the father said to his servants, ‘Bring out the best robe and put it on him, and put a ring on his hand and sandals on his feet. 23 And bring the fatted calf here and kill it, and let us eat and be merry; 24 for this my son was dead and is alive again; he was lost and is found.’ And they began to be merry. (NKJV)​
Abraham was not rebuked for eating meat, or serving it to the LORD:​
Genesis 18:1-8 1 Then the LORD appeared to him by the terebinth trees of Mamre, as he was sitting in the tent door in the heat of the day. 2 So he lifted his eyes and looked, and behold, three men were standing by him; and when he saw them, he ran from the tent door to meet them, and bowed himself to the ground, 3 and said, “My Lord, if I have now found favor in Your sight, do not pass on by Your servant. 4 Please let a little water be brought, and wash your feet, and rest yourselves under the tree. 5 And I will bring a morsel of bread, that you may refresh your hearts. After that you may pass by, inasmuch as you have come to your servant.” They said, “Do as you have said.”​
6 So Abraham hurried into the tent to Sarah and said, “Quickly, make ready three measures of fine meal; knead it and make cakes.” 7 And Abraham ran to the herd, took a tender and good calf, gave it to a young man, and he hastened to prepare it. 8 So he took butter and milk and the calf which he had prepared, and set it before them; and he stood by them under the tree as they ate. (NKJV)​
Luke 24:41-43​
41 But while they still did not believe for joy, and marveled, He said to them, “Have you any food here?” 42 So they gave Him a piece of a broiled fish and some honeycomb. 43 And He took it and ate in their presence. (NKJV)​
A baseless claim that all of those Scriptures are doctored is not convincing.

Here are various church fathers who do reference fish in feeding the multitudes, or eaten with honeycomb, or as a good gift, etc. some at quite early dates.

Ignatius Died around 108
To the Philippians

And how can He be but God, who raises up the dead, sends away the lame sound of limb, cleanses the lepers, restores sight to the blind, and either increases or transmutes existing substances, as the five loaves and the two fishes, and the water which became wine, and who puts to flight thy whole host by a mere word?


Justin Martyr 100-165
On the Resurrection

And when they were by every kind of proof persuaded that it was Himself, and in the body, they asked Him to eat with them, that they might thus still more accurately ascertain that He had in verity risen bodily; and He ate honey-comb and fish.

Origen 185-253
Commentary on Matthew

It must be observed, however, that while in Matthew, Mark, and Luke,5349 the disciples say that they have the five loaves and the two fishes, without indicating whether they were wheaten or of barley, John alone says, that the loaves were barley loaves.



Cyprian 210-258
To Antonianus About Cornelius and Novatian.

23. The Lord also in His Gospel, setting forth the love of God the Father, says, “What man is there of you, whom, if his son ask bread, will he give him a stone? or if he ask a fish, will he give him a serpent? If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your children, how much more shall your heavenly Father give good things to them that ask Him?”2494 The Lord is here comparing the father after the flesh, and the eternal and liberal love of God the Father.



Lactantius 250-325
The Divine Institutes

And when He had tarried there three days, and the people were suffering from hunger, He called His disciples, and asked what quantity of food672 they had with them. But they said that they had five loaves and two fishes in a wallet. Then He commanded that these should be brought forward, and that the multitude, distributed by fifties, should recline on the ground. When the disciples did this, He Himself broke the bread in pieces, and divided the flesh of the fishes, and in His hands both of them were increased.

I do not have to back off from asserting that if there are a number of verified changes to scripture passages found, as there are, it is possible and even likely there are more, that are not, maybe what is found is the tip of the iceberg. The scriptures warned of the scribes with lying pens.

What of this verse (not other ones, this! here is where something is missing that should be mentioned if it existed and there were not changes to other related texts, but here it was neglected), Mark 8:18-20?

There were the apostles and James who was the brother of Jesus.

It is all diversion from what I was saying all along that can't be shown otherwise, about God's will, it was what was shown in the beginning and God did not change, God never will change.
Upvote 0

My Parent's Will Prayers needed

Please pray, my brother has still not sent us a copy of my parent's will, as executer, we found out that he is supposed to do so. (we were told it was in probate, but that's not true apparently) Both my parents have passed, my Dad was a the last to pass a few years ago. They are dearly missed. <3 Please pray my brother sends us each a copy of their will. Of course I don't want my relationship with my brother to be broken so that is a concern too. He has broken ties with one sibling, but not our older sibling.
Prayers and advice. If your dad had a living trust then it was turned into an irrevocable trust and filed with the local county. You can obtain a copy there. If in fact it is on probate then the court will be the executor and fillfil those duties.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,873,813
Messages
65,340,171
Members
276,119
Latest member
pringles3208