The Art of (Epstein) Distraction
- By rjs330
- American Politics
- 136 Replies
Gee this sounds like schoolyard stuff.Yes, it is.
All those thousands of interview hours and no released interview with Epstien saying Trump was with under 18 year old girls.Wolff had unusual access to Trump with thousands of interview hours on tape as well as interviews with Epstein. His word is not proof, but it is evidence no matter how desperately you may deny it.
His words are just words. And as I pointed out, he never said Trump.was with topless under 18 year olds. No matter how much you want it to be true.
Lol, getting to am I?Silly taunting: I know you are but what am I.
I believe this whole conversation started when you accused Trump of being with topless under 18 year olds. And since then have been unable to show anything of the sort. Including the statement made by Wolff. You made an unproven accusation.That was not even an accusation but speculation; well, the second half is speculation. Even you, surely, aren't disputing the first half?
You said "Do you mean like the photos of him at Epstein's with topless young adolescents on his lap?"
Thats not speculation, thats an accusation and one you have been unable to prove. Even by your own source who never said that.
Unknown has a definition. It does NOT mean under 18 in any definition. And the word topless doesn't appear either. That is not a paraphrase that is a fabrication.Unless the exact phrase is found the meaning isn't there? No paraphrasing allowed!
I didn't know anything about Wolff as a journalist. So I had no emotions tied to him. Still dont. But when I looked him up to see what he was all about I discovered that other journalists discovered not find him credible. Some do. That's why he is questionable. Which leads me to want more than just some vague statement from him and some flat out fabrications from you apart from what he actually said.Your emotions may not allow you to accept Michael Wolff as a source, but beyond "Nu-uh!" you've shown nothing to discredit him as a source.
Upvote
0