• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Trump-enomics

The stock market went down 19.4% at its low and now seems to be near the record high it hit under Biden in October, 2024.

I just came across this on facebook and it made me think of folks who boast about the market (which always trends upward) hitting new highs under a given president:

View attachment 367054
Upvote 0

SCOTUS Limits Federal Judges’ Ability to Block Executive Actions Nationwide

In the past, the child born in the US was sent with the parents back to the parents' home nation. When the child turned 18, the US gave that person the right to renounce the citizenship of the parents, accept US citizenship, and enter the company.

That's how it worked in the past.
Down along the border in New Mexico where I used to live there are two little towns. On the Mexican side there is Puerto Palomas and on the US side is Columbus, with desert all around them For many years there was a maternity clinic in Columbus but none in Puerto Palomas, so women would cross the border to have their babies, birthright citizens, then they would go home. As a consequence, every morning the Luna County school bus stops at the border gate and US citizen kids walk through and get on the bus to school and they are dropped off again to go home to Mexico in the afternoon. That's how it works there. Not for much longer, though. The maternity clinic in Columbus has closed and now there is one in Puerto Palomas. Americans in the region cross the border now for many of their medical needs anyway.
Upvote 0

How is it that the Catholic Church is evil?

Brougtwithaprice you say ( or are we self centred and want God to love while we do nothing . ) That is what Bible tells us. He first loved us and we not him. We do good works because we love God it’s an automatic reaction and certainly not as a penance or that I have to please God with continued confessions in some way to earn my salvation. You then use the example of a smelly bride and a sweet smelling bride. It seems to me that you sold like to defrock me of my salvation and everyone else for that matter. What your saying is that a Christian can lose their salvation. Then how do we keep it? Is it by continued daily ritual confessions. And how manny times do you lose it ? with each evil thought or action and how many times do we regain our salvation?. Is it a case of being saved and then not being saved with the interpretation of your religion on that matter, by us not following the standard that you promote of continual confession ? I always thought the law was to bring us into the realisation that we cannot keep the law, and that brought us to the realisation that we need a Saviour. And the question must be asked how can anyone know they are truly saved if we can lose our salvation if we follow your mode of confession. But the reality is that all true Christians confess their failings on a consistent basis anyway View attachment 366997 As to the Calvinism you mention . Well what influenced John Calvin more barring the Bible . St Augustine of course. He was rather Calvinistic. And finally Why is that your religion so infatuated in wanting to control every aspect of a Christian’s being. ? And now it also seems our salvation also with what you have explained to me that our salvation is now not guaranteed by God.
I refer you to sacred scripture which clearly says that we cannot save ourselves, as does the Catholic Church, yet it does not tell us to act presumptuously. We are warned time and again to repent for the kingdom of God is at hand.
We are not told to rest now as salvation is assured. God is merciful, He is also just. God is love and love is voluntary. It requires an act of the will.
Salvation is not lost for those that actively love God. It can be discarded at any time for those that chose to discard God’s commands, do nothing and expect heaven blaming it all on someone that told them Jesus paid it all.
Jesus did pay it all, but if you want salvation, you have to ask for it. He who asks receives, seeks finds and knocks it is opened to them. That includes freedom from sin.
There is no excuse for a believing Christian to sin. The Bible says it is as if you crucify the Son of God afresh and bring Him to open shame. We need to react with horror to our sins, not take a lackadaisical attitude of no big deal, Jesus paid it all.
We can look at God’s warning in the Apocalypse also known as Revelation against taking salvation for granted. Those that have no fear of God say Jesus paid it all. They say I am rich, well fed and have need of nothing. God says they are miserable blind poor and naked. He then charges them to buy of Him gold tried in the fire, and gives promises to those that overcome. Those that won’t, He will vomit out of His mouth.
That is pretty scary.
We like to have our ears tickled and told everything is alright and we don’t have any responsibility, but that is not what the Bible says.
Some misinformed teachers say that, but we are not saved by teachers, we are saved the the Son of God who loves us and gives Himself for us. Do we love Him? Or take Him for granted ? Can we look on His broken body and continue to sin? Realizing that every sin is another spit of contempt, a crack of the whip that tears flesh, blood from His crown of thorns given to mock Him, and another drive of the nails that ended His life?
Can we really sin so easily knowing that is what we are doing? Can we really expect salvation from Him while treating Him with utter contempt? If you sin, that is what you are doing. Why would you scorn a Church that teaches us to confess our sins and not take Our Lord for granted?
Jesus is merciful and He will forgive our weakness, but we have to ask for forgiveness and show forth works of repentance. Scripture tells us to forgive our brother 70 times seven times but only after he says I repent. It does not teach us to give license to sin, nor should we presume the mercy of God and act as if we have a license to sin.
What? God will send to eternal hellfire those that do not believe and continue wickedness, but we can say, I believe in Jesus and we get a pass to do the same things? God forbid!
We do not sin more, so that grace may more abound. Freedom from sin is difficult but not impossible with the grace of God. He tells us narrow is the way, straight is the gate that leads to life. Strive to enter by the straight gate. Pursue holiness without which no one will see the Lord.
The spiritual battle is in our minds. Scripture says for us to be transformed by the renewing of our minds. That involves us to stop listening to false teachers that tell you sin does not matter, you are saved and cannot be lost. If we want salvation, we have to ask for it. How can we ask for it if we allow our minds to be deceived into thinking we do not need it?
The Calvinists are right in one thing is that there is an elect. However they get it wrong in that the elect are not merely those that believe there is an elect. The elect are those that do the will of the Father, which is to repent and live a life of holiness.
Jesus tells us many ways in which salvation can be discarded. One of them is the parable of the seed. We have the seed on the path, the seed on rock, and the seed among thorns. All of those seeds have heard the Gospel and did not put it into practice, some even received it with great joy but discarded it.
Keeping the commandments of God is not impossible, we have to be willing to ask God for help, and then humble enough to accept the help that is offered. He has given some Apostles, some prophets, some teachers, etc. It is arrogant to reject the help God offers and say we don’t need them, I can go to Jesus myself. Ok, how is that working out?
The path of life is hard. Jesus tells us we will be hated by all men for His name’s sake. We are to deny ourselves and take up our cross. The path of life is one of poverty, contempt and humility. We must mortify the deeds of our flesh according to scripture. God loves us and will help us whenever we ask Him, and He has promised to cleanse us from all unrighteousness, but we have to ask.
God does not force Himself on us and that is another error of the Calvinists. Grace is not irresistible. Free will is maintained as God is love and love is not love if it is not free. Scripture says we have set before us the path of life and death, choose which one you will serve, as for me, I will follow the Lord, not with my lips only, but in deeds
Satan lies to us, and tells us that we don’t have to repent. He says you don’t have to follow that hard path, take it easy, don’t run the race, it’s already won. Don’t work out your salvation with fear and trembling, works can’t save you. Holiness? Puhh no one can be holy, so don’t worry about it. Relax, take it easy, suffering is for suckers. Don’t take that path of poverty, contempt and humility. I give you the path of wealth, vain glory, and pride. Don’t deny yourself, puff your self up and have your ears tickled instead.
Satan is an angelic being so he is infinitely more intelligent than us, as can make convincing arguments. We can see through them by comparing them with scripture and the humility of self denial, along with the willingness to accept contempt.
Salvation is available at anytime while we are alive. God has tremendous love and will save anyone that asks Him, but we have to ask Him to cleanse us because now is the time, today is the day of salvation. We stop sinning today, not some pie in the sky future day. The spiritual battle begins now, there is time in eternity for us to rest in a salvation which cannot be lost. For now we are in a battle, so put on the full armor of God and fight against the powers of darkness, else be over run by them. It is your choice
  • Agree
Reactions: The Liturgist
Upvote 0

How can God be ok with most people going to hell?

Sorry if I was unclear. I only mentioned Colossians 2:13 because you mentioned tat verse in your post. You wrote "“Death to life” (Ephesians 2:5; Colossians 2:13) is only by Faith"

I quoted it to show that it doesn't mention faith.

Sorry, but I think you are reading far more into what I wrote than I actually said. I only said that saying that a sinner dead in trespasses and sins can stir himself to believe on the Lord Jesus Christ is similar to expecting dead Lazarus to stir out of his tomb. I never claimed that Jesus used Lazarus as an illustration of this

Sorry (again!) I wasn't insinuating anything into Colossians 2:13. By "those Scriptures," I was referring to the two verses from John's gospel, John 11:25 and John 5:24, which you had quoted, and which my words that you are referring to immediately followed.

My question to you is this: How can a sinner dead in trespasses and sins display faith in the Lord Jesus Christ? I hope we can discuss this as we started, without our posts becoming in anyway unpleasant. Thanks for taking the trouble to reply.

Your question is:
How can a sinner dead in trespasses and sins display faith in the Lord Jesus Christ?

Here is how the Scriptures teach about how a sinner comes to faith in Lord Jesus:

Romans 10:14-18"So faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. But I say, didn’t they hear? Yes, most certainly, “Their sound went out into all the earth, their words to the ends of the world.”"

The Holy Spirit works with the Gospel (Ephesians 6:17) convicting and drawing a sinful world to Lord Jesus (John 16:8).

Ephesians 6:17‘The Sword of the Spirit is the Word of God

John 16:8“When the Spirit arrives; he will convict the world about sin, about righteousness, and about judgment”

The drawing of God by the Word and Spirit is for all people, for God’s kind intent is to have mercy on all sinners, and all have sinned.

Romans 11:32“For God has concluded all in unbelief, so that he might have mercy upon all.”

1 Timothy 2:3-4“God desires everyone to be saved and come to a full knowledge of the truth.”

John 12:32“When I am lifted up from the earth, then I will draw all people to myself.”

Though God's invitation to all sinners is sincere, the Scriptures warn, sometimes with sorrow, that not all will receive it. God doesn’t desire anyone to perish.

2 Peter 3:9‘The Lord is very patient, not wishing anyone to perish, but that all should come to repentance.’

The "drawing" by the Word and Spirit is not efficacious. Many do refuse the Gospel Call; in that, they resist the Spirit as the Word is proclaimed.

Acts 7:51“You stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, you always resist the Holy Spirit!”

2 Thessalonians 2:10“They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved.”

Romans 10:21“All day long I stretched out my hands to a disobedient and obstinate people.”

Matthew 22:3“He sent his servants to those who were invited [called] to the banquet to ask them to come, but they refused.”

Even so, God’s will and good pleasure is to save whoever believes by the preaching work, and God shows no favoritism or no partiality in His gracious offer.

John 6:40 – “For [the reason for stating the previous] this is my Father’s will, that everyone who looks on the Son and believes in him should have [Grk: eche: subjunctive] eternal life

1 Corinthians 1:21 – ‘God’s good pleasure is to save all who believe by the foolishness of the preaching.’

Acts 10:34-35 – “34 Then Peter began to speak: “I now realize how true it is that God does not show favoritism. 35 He accepts from every nation the one who fears him and does what is right.”

Paul states the following:

1 Corinthians 9:22-23" 22 To the weak I became as weak, that I might gain the weak. I have become all things to all men, that I may by all means save some."
Upvote 0

Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

Yes, people who don't believe in God don't believe in God, but the theory of evolution is the same for them as it is for scientists who are theists.
So what?
The issue comes down to polemics and counter apologetic use, as science in the popular space has been colonized by atheist polemicists such as Richard Dawkins who treat the success of the theory of evolution and the inaccessibility of the question of God's existence to science as evidence that God does not exist. To claim that there is not a metaphysical element to the dispute is little more than a failure to understand the full scope of the issue. The debate is not, in principal, a scientific debate at all. It's a conflict of philosophical approacches to knowledge acquisition coupled with a clash of worldviews. This is especially apparent when the atheist colonization of science is challenged by those who are not acting in opposition to scientific consensus, as rather than allying with believers who wish to uphold the integrity of the scientific enterprise those on the atheist side attempt to silence such voices and place the focus on the most ignorant of creationists. So to claim the metaphysics are irrelevant to the discussion fails to understand the real nature of the debate.
Upvote 0

Zohran Mamdani Proposes Taxing 'Whiter Neighborhoods' in NYC


A housing policy document on Mamdani's official website includes a pledge to "shift the tax burden from homeowners in the outer boroughs to more expensive homes in richer and whiter neighborhoods."
The article says the "official campaign website" says that, but there is no link or even image of it. There should be a link to the housing policy document. Thank you, @ThatRobGuy for providing this!
Great, so why was the "white" part tossed in there in the memo?
That is certainly tone deaf. The only thing I can think of is that if he limited it to "wealthy" he would be accused of antisemitism, like when Omar referred to "the Benjamins".
Upvote 0

If universalism is true then why did God send His Son to die for our sins?

The idea that those who will have faith only in the mortal body is what scripture is talking about, does not add up to the big picture that scripture is painting. There are to many scriptures that either directly or indirectly say that all will be saved to just ignore or not to deal with at all.
All the scriptures that talk about "eternal hell" are totally shown to be false just by using the original Greek of that day, if one understands that the rest of the scriptures paint a beautiful story of a God who loves his creation and will stop at nothing to save his children, God has a plan and is working it, Jesus really is the savior of the world not a potential savior.
My friend. We have covered all of what you posted many times before. An opinion is not evidence. But I’ll tell you this, by doubting God’s plan you are in fact judging God and His awesome plan. Follow the scriptures not your opinion. God bless you.
Upvote 0

Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

I'm not sure this is entirely true, as it seems to me among many atheists there is a refusal to acknowledge they have made a metaphysical commitment. And for a decent segment of atheists science fills a pseudo-religious role as they look to it to provide their lives with meaning and morals, and during difficult moments in their lives emerse themselves deeper into their commitments. Rather than recognizing that science cannot even begin to answer questions about God they take the restrictions of science to be a reflection of reality in general. So perhaps there is lip service paid to such a difference, but as a pragmatic function any distinction is often lost.
Yes, people who don't believe in God don't believe in God, but the theory of evolution is the same for them as it is for scientists who are theists.
So what?
Upvote 0

The Big Beautiful Bill shall became Law

Why?

Tell me what is the best item in this bill and how it’s an objectively good thing for the country.
Tax cuts, more money and resources to deport illegal immigrants, Medicaid reform, etc., etc., and etc. Those are all objectively good things which the majority of the voters in 31 states voted for and want to happen.
Upvote 0

Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

But those can never be taken as any more than speculations.
Sure, as is true of any circumstantial case. The thresholds for positive appraisal depend on the field in question, and any historical question is ultimately a matter of speculation to some degree.
That was my fault. In general, when one speaks of evidence in this, a science forum it is generally assumed that scientific evidence is what is meant, an assumption that I shouldn't take for granted.
Which is exactly why declarations about a purported lack of evidence for the supernatural is inherently flawed, as the field of evidence has been restricted to a range in which no comment can be made either way. In such statements, science is made to speak on an issue it cannot address.
Upvote 0

Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

I would bet large sums of money they don't.
Not on the creationist side, although it is apparent that they realize that there is some kind of a difference.
Say no more. I believe you said something about the "character" of my "rhetoric." :rolleyes:

I rest my case.
LOL! Here, I'll say it nicer: ID has been found to be entirely without merit as science by both atheistic and theistic scientists and many Christian communites--including the Roman Catholic Church--have found it without merit as theology.
Upvote 0

The Harm Caused by Excessive Criticism of the Roman Catholic Church and Other Denominations

I’m not aware of any Roman Catholics who worship the Pope.

But that also misses the point of this thread - the attacks on Roman Catholicism harm other ancient churches because many of them, like your criticism, is predicated on a false dichotomy wherein everyone who doesn’t share your approach to worship is grouped together with the Roman Catholics, and the important contributions of the Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox to Christianity, for example, in developing the Nicene Creed and the 27-book New Testament Canon, both of which are accepted universally, get ignored.

Some people even attack the Creed, thinking it is some sort of Roman Catholic artifact, for instance, the Jehovah’s Witnesses go so far in their anti-Catholicism as to deny the Holy Trinity, as did many Millerites.

Hello?

Personal relationship?
Upvote 0

SCOTUS Limits Federal Judges’ Ability to Block Executive Actions Nationwide

What should happen is that the parents should be sent home. If they have someone to leave the child with till they return legally they can do that. If they want to keep the child with them, they can take the child back to their country with them and the child is free to return when the parents return legally.
In the past, the child born in the US was sent with the parents back to the parents' home nation. When the child turned 18, the US gave that person the right to renounce the citizenship of the parents, accept US citizenship, and enter the company.

That's how it worked in the past.
Upvote 0

SCOTUS Limits Federal Judges’ Ability to Block Executive Actions Nationwide

Slavery is something else entirely. If you are stolen from one country and forcibly taken to another, I have no issues with your children being a citizen. Most slaves had no way to get home.
Given that slaves weren’t “imported” since 1808, “home” was always the USA/CSA/USA.

We are talking about people who come here on their own voluntarily.
I thought we were talking about children born while their parents were here, voluntarily.
Upvote 0

SCOTUS Limits Federal Judges’ Ability to Block Executive Actions Nationwide

Well, help me out then. As far as I know a birthright baby becoming a citizen by birth does not change the citizenship status of its parents. It seems to have nothing do do with the citizenship status of the parents, any more than your birth changed the citizenship status of your parents.
What does the Supreme Court know that I don't?
The Supreme Court did not rule on birthright citizenship.

They didn't even reverse the lower court's injunction...which also was not a ruling on birthright citizenship.

There has not yet been any court ruling on birthright citizenship.
  • Winner
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Senator Thom Tillis: The Big Beautiful Bill breaks Trump's Promise

Government Waste Tracker:

  • $22,600,000,000 (HHS) – Aiding illegal migrants through resettlementprograms, home and car purchases, and loans
  • $7,500,000,000 (DOT) – Funding a few dozen electric vehicle stationsacross the nation
  • $7,000,000,000 (EPA) – Funding green energy projects that reduce greenhouse gases and promoting the adoption of green alternatives nationwide
  • $5,000,000,000 (EPA) - Funding green energy projects that reduce gas emissions and supporting green banks
  • $2,000,000,000 (EPA) – Funding projects to decarbonize American housing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
  • $382,000,000 (DOL) – Issuing fraudulent unemployment payments to tens of thousands of individuals, including those with birthdates in the future, infants, and people listed as 115 years old
  • $312,000,000 (SBA) – Providing business loans for children 11 years old and under
  • $59,000,000 (FEMA) – Supplying services and housing for illegal immigrants in New York City
  • $46,500,000 (DOS) – Funding projects to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil
  • $43,300,000 (USAID) – Supporting programs to build an inclusive and capable workforce, with a special emphasis on public health and climate change sectors in Egypt
  • $35,900,000 (USAID) – Funding positive youth experience in Gaza
  • $31,000,000 (USAID) – Supporting the transition to clean energy with energy supplies in Europe and Eurasia
  • $26,300,000 (USAID) – Supporting higher education in Egypt
  • $24,000,000 (USAID) – Promoting “resilient livelihoods” in Gaza
  • $17,500,000 (USAID) - Supporting male circumcision and condom programs
  • $17,300,000 (USAID) – Providing the Diversity and Inclusion ScholarshipProgram to students in Burma
  • $13,200,000 (USAID) – Supporting biodiversity programs in Liberia
  • $12,200,000 (DOL) – Promoting worker empowerment in South America
  • $11,000,000 (USAID) – Producing the Middle Eastern version of Sesame Street in Iraq
  • $10,300,000 (USAID) – Supporting male circumcision programs in Mozambique
  • $9,000,000 (USAID) – Stolen humanitarian aid by Al-Qaida-affiliated terrorists
  • $8,300,000 (USAID) – Building worker power for equity and justice
  • $8,300,000 (USAID) – Funding USAID education on equity and inclusion
  • $8,000,000 (EPA) – Funding an organization to address environmental and energy justice issues
  • $6,200,000 (NIH) – Studying the effects of asthma on transgender individuals in the U.S.
  • $6,000,000 (DOD) – Funding the University of Montana to “strengthen American democracy by bridging divides”
  • $6,000,000 (DOD) – Funding a grant to decarbonize emissions from Navy ships
  • $5,900,000 (NIH) – Funding for a TransHealthGUIDE for gender-diverse young adults
  • $5,700,000 (DOS) – Supporting programs for LGBTQ+ individuals in Latin America and the Caribbean
  • $5,200,000 (DOD) – Funding a grant to diversify the Navy
  • $5,100,000 (NIH) – Testing the effects of cross-sex hormone therapy on transgender individuals in the U.S.
  • $4,900,000 (USAID) – Funding youth programs with a focus on reproductive health and the intersection of youth and gender equity
  • $4,700,000 (DOL) – Promoting international labor standards in Ecuador
  • $4,000,000 (EPA) – Building a one-room museum inside the EPA
  • $3,500,000 (DOD) – Supporting DEI groups through the Defense Human Resources Activity
  • $3,300,000 (DOD) – Unionized health workers in the Department of Defense’s Defense Health Agency spent $3,300,000 and 87,000 hours doing union-related work instead of their federal jobs
  • $2,900,000 (NIH) – Studying HIV prevention for transgender women and their male partners
  • $2,500,000 (NIH) – Studying the impact of structural racism on the health of older gay men
  • $2,500,000 (USAID) – Supporting green energy businesses in Vietnam
  • $2,000,000 (USAID) – Supporting gender-affirming healthcare and LGBTQ+ advocacy in Guatemala
  • $1,900,000 (DOD) – Providing holistic diversity, equity, and inclusion transformation and training for the Air Force
  • $1,600,000 (NIH) – Testing the reproductive health of transgender individuals in the U.S.
  • $1,600,000 (DOD) – Funding a University of Florida study on the "social and institutional detriments of vulnerability and resilience to climate hazards in [the] African Sahel."
  • $1,500,000 (USAID) – Promoting DEI business policies and LGBTQ+ entrepreneurship in Serbia
  • $1,200,000 (USAID) – Funding choice, equity, and sustainability programs
  • $910,000 (NIH) – Testing the effects of “gender-affirming” hormone therapy on the immune system in the U.S.
  • $900,000 (IAF) – Supporting alpaca farming in Peru
  • $755,000 (NIH) – Testing the effects of “gender-affirming” hormone therapy on bone development in the U.S.
  • $731,000 (IAF) – Improving the commercial viability of mushroom and pea farming in Guatemala
  • $677,000 (IAF) – Promoting fruit and jam sales in Honduras
  • $600,000 (USDA) – Supporting a study on the menstrual cycles in transgender men
  • $599,000 (NIH) – Testing the risk of breast cancer for transgender men in the U.S.
  • $483,000 (IAF) – Supporting the production of artisanal salt in Ecuador
  • $400,000 (DOS) – Supporting LGBTQ+ sensitivity trainings for police forces in Nigeria
  • $374,000 (USDA) – Hiring a DEI onboarding specialist at the USDA
  • $325,000 (HHS) – Adapting LGB+ teen pregnancy prevention program for transgender boys
  • $323,000 (IAF) – Promoting cultural support for Venezuelan migrants in Brazil
  • $300,000 (DOS) – Promoting acceptance for LGBTQ+ people in Botswana
  • $298,000 (USDA) – Promoting international development for underrepresented communities
  • $246,000 (USADF) _ Funding mango drying facilities in the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire
  • $239,000 (USADF) – Promoting pineapple juice in Benin
  • $229,000 (USDA) – Hiring a Brazilian forest and gender consultant at the USDA
  • $229,000 (USADF) – Funding the promotion of 100% organic shea butter in Burkina Faso
  • $209,000 (DOS) – Funding an international study trip on LGBTQ+ advocacy
  • $185,000 (DOS) – Promoting the empowerment of lesbian and bisexual women in Belize
  • $99,500 (USADF) – Supporting increased production of yogurt in Uganda
  • $84,000 (USADF) – Supporting a business incubator for spa and wellness entrepreneurs in Nigeria
  • $70,000 (DOS) – Producing a DEI music event in Ireland
  • $68,000 (DOS) – Funding dance class workshops in China
  • $32,000 (DOS) – Creating an LGBTQ+ comic book in Peru
  • $29,000 (USDA) – Hiring a Central American gender assessment consultant at the USDA
  • $25,000 (DOS) – Funding a transgender opera in Colombia
“Waste“ is in the eye of the beholder
  • Agree
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

Hakeem Jeffries politicizes on and on for over eight hours

Isn’t this a little late and a desperate attempt to obscure the great win today?
Who was the GOP representative that changed their vote on a bill only because a colleague filibustered? That’s not a very reliable politician if you ask me.

There’s not too many who were holding out. Who do you think it was?
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,872,841
Messages
65,324,014
Members
276,056
Latest member
revivedsue