• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Spanish Inquisiton

Fox failed to mention the attrocities committed against Roman Catholics, for example the Martyrs of Gorkum, whose feast was this week, who were the victims of shocking cruelty.

Thus, as a Protestant martyrology his work is acceptable, but reading an account of the period of 1500-1900 without reading the Roman martyrology for the same period results in bias.

The cruelty was made worse by the fact that, as the Roman martyrology states, “agónem suum, adstrictis láqueo fáucibus, consummárunt” - they were hanged with the noose tied around their jaws. Their bodies were also desecrated, in some cases while they were still alive, since hanging in that vicious manner does not produce a quick or painless death.

Thus the message is we should reject all sectarian violence rather than falsely assuming Protestants or indeed Orthodox are incapable of attroticites and preposterously blaming everything on the Roman Catholic Church.

The point of studying the Spanish Inquisition is not that Catholics are uniquely evil, but humans are capable of great evil even when seeking to do good.
You say this as though I or anyone else is denying it. I make no excuses for evil acts by any. Nor have I declared that Protestants have not indulged in such atrocities, but to the contrary, have played the role of Babylonian harlot as well as Catholics when entering into illicit political relations with the kings and governments of this world. What I am contesting on this thread, are the numbers of victims involved concerning Roman Catholic persecutions. Not that no Protestants or Orthodoxies either, have never committed such acts.

I will look further into this event though, to verify and or clarify the circumstances involved, as this act was committed during the thirty years war I do believe.
Upvote 0

LGBT suicide hotline counselor appears to endorse teen's plan to leave home, live with coach

Trump admin. announced funding cuts for Trevor Project-linked hotline last month

A leaked recording of a counseling session with a controversial LGBT activist group appeared to endorse a fictional teen’s plan to leave home and move in with her coach, who promised to facilitate access to cross-sex hormones and a double mastectomy.

The recording, shared by “mom activist” Beth Bourne, captures a conversation where Bourne, posing as a 15-year-old girl identifying as a transgender boy, described feeling unsafe at home due to her mother’s alleged misgendering. After telling an unidentified Trevor Project crisis counselor that she felt unsafe at home after she was “misgendered,” Bourne asked if moving into her softball coach's house was a good idea since he “promised to help me get online [testosterone] and my breasts removed.”

The counselor responded, “Yeah, yeah, that makes sense,” adding, "It sounds like her feelings about this have gotten worse over time. And it sounds like you have two options, maybe, to leave the situation and find a better space for yourself." The counselor then asks, "What would it be like to go live with your coach?"

Continued below.
I’m not sure what the whole story is. I just hope everyone is safe.
Upvote 0

Trump Burns 500 Tons of Food Meant for the Hungry

Totally true sis. That's why when I see my fellow man hungry, thirsty, naked, a stranger, sick, or in prison, I remind them that none of us is immortal, and then I rev my Rolls-Royce to spit exhaust in their faces, and then take a bath in Dom Perignon. As the good Lord intended.

-CryptoLutheran
Meh, I merely hunt them for sport. I mean, none of us are getting out of this alive so... Why not?
Upvote 0

Director of National Intelligence Gabbard calls for prosecution of Obama

It's not about whether I'm serious, it's about whether Director Gabbard is serious.
It's not about whether Gabbard is serious, but about whether the DOJ indicts and convicts anybody.
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Trump Burns 500 Tons of Food Meant for the Hungry

No opinion. I provided a much less far left politically dramatic article but you are stuck on the drama. Drama over facts. Got it.
Again, you need to address the facts of the matter, which are plain to see. Forget about introducing any drama. Ignore any opinion. Neither changes what has happened. You can certainly offer your personal take on the matter. But base them on those facts as presented.
Upvote 0

Tucker Carlson Removed by Rupert Murdoch for "Overtly Religious Remarks" During Speech at Heritage Foundation Gala

I haven't followed this story much, but I thought Tucker was fired from Fox
after they were forced to settle with Dominion for falsely accusing the
software company of rigging voting machines which gave Biden the win
in 2020?

Carlson was guilty of spreading this false information apparently.
I think Carlson has his own podcast.
Upvote 0

Jesus claimed He came to fulfill the Law, Did He?

One should not quote Greek unless they know it a bit better than quoting Strongs.

There is a lot in that citation. All of which depends on Context, syntax and grammar.
Keep mind in respect to Romans Jesus said that all the Law and prophets Hang, depend on the Love of God above all else and the Love for one another.
Hang my friend in the sense of depends not done away with.
This says absolutely nothing. Is totally unresponsive and did not address my post.
Repleting or completing something doesn't negate unless specified. And Jesus didn't. As a matter of Fact, he said he did not come to destroy, loosen down the Law or the prophets. He came to fulfill, do to it's fullest, cause to abound Matt 5.

Couple that with the fact that he also said those who break and teach the least of these commandments, shall be called least in the Kingdom of Heaven.

If fulfilled was meant done away with as you proclaim then there are a lot contradictions and wasted words within the same passage. Thank the Lord our God it doesn't.
Fulfill means completed. Once again, completely unresponsive. You need evidence if you want to make a point.
Upvote 0

Barack Obama suggests men need gay friends to learn 'empathy and kindness'

Are you suggesting that we promote homosexuality by being kind to gays?

But that's not what is being promoted. Social acceptance and normalization is what is being promoted by LGBT groups. The idea of such relationships being sinful (which they are) is antithetical to that program.
I never hinted at promoting the LGBTQ COMMUNITY.

So you agree with me we shouldn't normalize sin?
No, I'm saying that we shouldn't be hypocritical by picking and choosing which sins are to be condemned.

We're not picking and choosing. :/ The idea that blacks or whites are inherently superior is as wrong as LGBT. Do you agree?
Well, by sinning, aren't you promoting those sins, using your approach.
I guess. But I'm not saying those actions aren't sinful or not worthy of shame now am I?
Upvote 0

Jesus claimed He came to fulfill the Law, Did He?

Pleroma- to fulfill.

πλήρωμα plḗrōma, play'-ro-mah; from G4137; repletion or completion, i.e. (subjectively) what fills (as contents, supplement, copiousness, multitude), or (objectively) what is filled (as container, performance, period):—which is put in to fill up, piece that filled up, fulfilling, full, fulness.

One should not quote Greek unless they know it a bit better than quoting Strongs.

There is a lot in that citation. All of which depends on Context, syntax and grammar.
Keep mind in respect to Romans Jesus said that all the Law and prophets Hang, depend on the Love of God above all else and the Love for one another.
Hang my friend in the sense of depends not done away with.


The law is finished, repleted, completed. The oxford dictionary only gives the meaning of the translated word not the original, Greek word.

Even from the Oxford dictionary I don’t know where you got your definition or if you only copied what supported your belief but here is the definition of the English word fulfilled.

1. fulfill something to do or achieve what was hoped for or expectedto fulfill your dream/ambition/potential
2. fulfill something to do or have what is required or necessaryto fulfill a duty/an obligation/a promiseto fulfill the terms/conditions of an agreementNo candidate fulfills all the criteria for this position.
Repleting or completing something doesn't negate unless specified. And Jesus didn't. As a matter of Fact, he said he did not come to destroy, loosen down the Law or the prophets. He came to fulfill, do to it's fullest, cause to abound Matt 5.

Couple that with the fact that he also said those who break and teach the least of these commandments, shall be called least in the Kingdom of Heaven.

If fulfilled was meant done away with as you proclaim then there are a lot contradictions and wasted words within the same passage. Thank the Lord our God it doesn't.
Upvote 0

Barack Obama suggests men need gay friends to learn 'empathy and kindness'

I wouldn't say that people need a gay friend but we all need to communicate with those that are different so that we can understand that we are mostly the same.
Having children works to this end. Don't need gays for this..
Upvote 0

People who die as infants go to Heaven, right? Is there a good argument to the contrary?

Chapter and verse
Of his doctrine?
I have no idea what you are talking about----before you comment on others, you might follow your own advice "Think about your own logic before jumping to your death feet first accusing others of fallacies.
Lol I was not even talking to you and you come out guns blazing. Chill out bud.
Upvote 0

Barack Obama suggests men need gay friends to learn 'empathy and kindness'

So you're suggesting we promote divorce to children?
Are you suggesting that we promote homosexuality by being kind to gays?
Like you're suggesting we promote LGBT?
I never hinted at promoting the LGBTQ COMMUNITY.
Alright and? Are you suggesting it's okay to promote White supremacy as well as LGBT?
No, I'm saying that we shouldn't be hypocritical by picking and choosing which sins are to be condemned.
I am the worst of sinners but how does any of this justify the promotion LGBT?
Well, by sinning, aren't you promoting those sins, using your approach.
Upvote 0

Spanish Inquisiton

Which makes sense, because anti-Catholic translations of the Bible such as the Geneva Bible contain inline doctrinal comments which the less educated faithful could confuse with the text itself, and any Bible not produced under ecclesiastical scrutiny might contain errors. Thus it makes sense to limit the versions used by the laity or to discourage the use of unauthorized translations.

When we consider the proliferation of dubious translations like the NRSVue, the New World Translation and others which are edited in such a way as to undermine Christian doctrines related to the Trinity, human sexuality and other issues, the validity of the Roman approach becomes clear.

Now in the Orthodox Church, we lack this restriction, but there are officially sanctioned Bibles, but in English, the Eastern Orthodox have lacked the resources to do their own entirely original translation; the Orthodox Study Bible uses the NKJV with an original translation of the Septuagint. The Copts and Armenians haven’t been able to do this at all and most Copts in the Middle East are using a very unsatisfactory Arabic Bible translated by Protestants which is missing several books used by the Coptic Orthodox Church.

The Syriac Orthodox and the Assyrian Church of the East benefit from the Peshitta, but even among those who speak Aramaic (a majority of Assyrians but a minority of Syriac Orthodox), classical Syriac literacy is limited largely to clergy, leading to use of the flawed Arabic translations. And while there are English translations of the Peshitta, some of them, like the Lamsa Bible, are fundamentally flawed, and others such as the Murdoch and Etheridge, are obscure.

The Ethiopians have been really fortunate in this one respect.
Which is to ignore the fact that Roman Catholic kings and queens picked up upon enforcing these bans by law, with penalties ranging from fines, to torture and death by burning at the stake. With full papal support. This if course being the real problem, temporal punishments for those choosing not to believe and or submit to the teachings of a religious institution. Allowed and even supported if not inspired, by said religious institution, and or later ones as well. Many Catholic's themselves being the ones desiring and eventually demanding the right to decide for themselves which translations of scripture were the more authentic. As they themselves having acquired and or read the scriptures for themselves, noticed direct problems and or contradictions between Catholic teaching and or accepted translations of scripture, and what they believed to be the scriptures real and or original thought or intent.

The Catholic church most certainly should have defended her own teachings and translations of scripture against that which she perceived to be incorrect. But when she entered into illicit relationships with the kings of this earth in aggressive compulsion and mandated "Christianity" she crossed the line over into a form of spiritual adultery described in holy scripture. That of the sins of Babylon the Great, who commits fornication with the kings of the earth. In tyrannically imposing the supposed teachings and religion of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, upon an unwilling people within predominantly Catholic nations. Transforming the spiritual kingdom of our Lord Jesus Christ, into erroneous models of literal professed "Christian" kingdoms of this world. Thereby becoming the persecutor of peoples and nations, rather than the persecuted our Lord and Savior declared that all of His authentic followers would become.

I wonder, do you believe it would acceptable to repeat this history of censorship today? If it was right to do so back then, should it not therefore be just as right to do so again today? If not why not? Have the teachings of God's word changed for today, from back then?

Jhn 15:18 If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you. 19 If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you. 20 Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also.

2Ti 3:10 But thou hast fully known my doctrine, manner of life, purpose, faith, longsuffering, charity, patience, 11 Persecutions, afflictions, which came unto me at Antioch, at Iconium, at Lystra; what persecutions I endured: but out of them all the Lord delivered me. 12 Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution. 13 But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived. 14 But continue thou in the things which thou hast learned and hast been assured of, knowing of whom thou hast learned them; 15 And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. 16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.
Upvote 0

Trump calls his supporters "troublemakers" after Grand Jury orders release of Epstein files

Yep when the files are released and don't contain incriminating damaging info against Trump, that means the evidence was destroyed or tampered with.
Not necessarily. I mean, he and his people might be desperately trying to keep them hidden for all sorts of other reasons. Can't think of one right now, but I'm sure there must be one. I mean, Trump has never been caught trying to hide information about sexual misconduct before, right?

Oh, wait...

Donald Trump found guilty in New York hush money trial

A Manhattan jury found him guilty on all 34 charges of falsifying business records to cover up a payoff to a porn star.
  • Like
Reactions: public hermit
Upvote 0

Jesus claimed He came to fulfill the Law, Did He?

Perhaps for some people faith leads to worshipping other gods, using His holy name in vain, bowing to false images, breaking His holy Sabbath day, not honoring our father and mother, murdering, stealing, committing adultery, lying and coveting, but I do not think thats what Paul had in mind when He said righteousness is by faith and faith does not void the law but establishes, but I guess we will all find out at His soon return. The more people are set in their decisions Rev 22:11 the sooner Jesus will come back.
Those would be the ones that profess Christ outwardly but not inwardly. Those born again walk in the Spirit.
I will just once again agree to disagree.
I’ll be around.
Upvote 0

House Passes Trump-Backed Rescissions Package Slashing $9 BILLION in Bloated Spending — FOREIGN AID, NPR, and PBS on the Chopping Block — Two Republic

There are getting so much help, and continue to encourage people to come and volunteer. It pleases me when they get tangible important projects done, like water purification, that help so many people:

"SUBMERSIBLE PUMP & WATER PURIFYING MACHINE: Among other things, the need for clean, safe drinking water has always been our priority in this mission. With the history of cholera and other water-related diseases one cannot help but think of how safe it is to have a sip of water in this part of the country. With the help of friends and supporters from First Presbyterian Church of Richmond, Haiti Hope and Promise, and our benefactors, what was once a dream is a now reality. Within a year a new submersible pump was installed. In 2016 water purifying room was built, water tank storage up and a modern up-to-date water purifying machine continues to run on daily basis to provide safe, clean, fresh drinking water to our residents, brothers, workers, visitors and friends."
A “water purifying room”…for “our residents, brothers, workers, visitors and friends."
Now nice for these lucky few!
Upvote 0

Jesus claimed He came to fulfill the Law, Did He?

In context, Paul is correcting that the Jews were trying to force new Gentile converts to getting circumcised in order to hear the gospel Gal 2:3 and for salvation Acts 15:1 as they were teaching all they had to do is get circumcised in order to be saved.
That is correct but what that actually means is that the Jews wanted the Christians to BE Jews which also included the following of the law. Circumcision is part of the law. Paul‘s words here teach the opposite of what you are teaching.
Upvote 0

Trump will reopen Alcatraz

There's a giant flat concrete part of the island.... Just build a high-rise prison right there, 100 stories high, and keep the old relic next to it.
A monument to carceration? In the “land of the free”?
Well, it’ll balance out the Statue of Liberty, one supposes.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,873,602
Messages
65,337,020
Members
276,109
Latest member
The_Lost_Sheep