The Trump DOJ goes "woke" and will target free speech.
- By Hentenza
- American Politics
- 246 Replies
I am a centrist also and I dont think of left and right the way you do. Both sides argue for democracy and no side argues for autocracy since autocracy is not consistent with the US tricameral form of government. There is no dichotomy just issues which are argued by their individual twists.I'm a centrist. Therefore, I apply the left/right dichotomy to denote the objective view as being at the abstract center of two subjective yet equally valid opposite points of view. So, I will be arguing that what is on the left is Democracy and that autocracy is on the right; so as to denote the objective view of the delegation of power, or in other words the centralizing and decentralizing of power to set policy for all, reasoned n a true dichotomy. --> Democracy/Autocracy.
It is not a negative spin but actually true. Do some research on what policies and stances caused the democrats the last election.This was your statement: "In fact the democratic views on immigration, obsessiveness with cultural issues, and soft on crime stances, all progressive and far left stances, lost the party many votes in the last election". <-- As a centrist I would argue that this connotes a negative spin and it's subjective.
It is widely known that the left policies on immigration lean toward open borders compared to the right which lean toward closed borders. This is old news.What are the Democratic views on immigration? You don't actually say, but as it stands your statement qualifies as a subjective negative view/imagery of the Democrats view. What is "obsessiveness" doing there? Would I find this term on the Democratic platform? Not likely.
The obsessiveness as I stated it related to cultural issues such as parental rights, LGTBQ policies, and soft on crime policies. There is no objective view per se since individual perspective are ymmv.The objective view would see cultural "obsessions" from both sides. An obsessive cultural issue can also be observed in these sentiments from the autocratic side, "They're poisoning the blood of our country", and, "They're eating the dogs and the cats". <-- These are based in negative prejudice.
Again, look at the criticism of DA’s from dark blue cities such as San Francisco, Chicago, New York, Portland, etc. for allowing violent criminals back on the street with little to no bond, for example. Again, this has been on the news constantly for a few years now. Maybe keep up with the news?Finally, the "soft on crime" sentiment. <-- I don't think I will find this on the Democratic party platform either.
There is no autocrat. The form of the US government is composed of the executive, Supreme Court, and congress.The fact is that the autocrat says he will be tough on the far-left radical groups who got Charlie Kirk killed. <--I'd say this is wacko and is far more serious an issue than "soft on crime".
Here we agree.People are easily deceived, I'm sorry to say. Social media makes money causing mayhem and Power is for sale in the marketplace.
Upvote
0