ABC pulls Jimmy Kimmel Live after comments on Charlie Kirk
- By rambot
- News & Current Events (Articles Required)
- 717 Replies
Still having trouble reading eh?Why do you keep harping on black people?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Still having trouble reading eh?Why do you keep harping on black people?
noSo you agree with me.
So you agree with me.No it cannot.
It allows you to feel like yo ucan.
The UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONs are two fold are
1) that black people could NOT get that job on their own capacity.
2) That the company has NO interest in hiring properly qualified individuals.
It's hard to decide which take is hotter.
No it cannot.Of course I've heard the clip. Why else would I be talking about it? If you can't figure it out, what he was saying was if there were no such thing as affirmative action, I would not wonder about a black pilot. But because of affirmative action, it can be legitimate to have a concern.
Over here we're treated like we're adults.Over here we don’t have to put up with awful people using ‘free speech’ as an excuse for being g awful people.
Careful of punctuation that did not exist in the original scripts. Easy to alter the meaning when applied. He asked to be remembered for a time when it would be suitable to the will of God. He wasn't selfish over the matter like most humans clamouring to make salvation about themselves (like the other thief)Luke 23:42 Jesus told him , that TODAY you will be with ME. in Paradise
Not only are conservatives going to stand their ground, we are going to take back what was lost.
Is it a "take" when someone asks you to clarify what you meant and you do so?![]()
I don't particularly care about any of them, but there's a pretty significant different between what Carlson did that led to his firing and what Kimmel did.It's hard to feel bad for Jimmy.
While I thought he was a talented comedian, he was the same one who was pretty joyful about someone else getting fired for expressing differing viewpoints.
Login to view embedded media
(ignore the commentary in-between from whoever that youtuber is, this isn't an endorsement of his content, this was simply the only clip I was able to find showing when Jimmy laughed about Tucker getting fired)
So would sexual assault be a sexual deviancy?Wrong. According to the psychological dictionary, sexual deviancy is any sexual behaviour that is seen to be different from the norms we expect.
I didn't dismiss them - it's just that nothing jumped out at me as "far left". Again, are there any that you'd like to highlight as being particularly extreme?She does not look center left to me. You dismissed all of her votes for the left and honed in one that looks from the right.
Repeating dogma doesn't teach me anything. Support your arguments - you claim they're far left. Okay. Why? What is your evidence? Convince me.That’s ok you are obviously stuck on your believes and not willing to learn. Your objective seems to just want to win the argument. Not interested anymore.
That's all you showed us. I'm not saying you're wrong; I'm just saying that we need a reason to think you're right. And you could be. But mixing colors is kind of a public school thing. Grooming them to be readers seems to be the real concern.See only what you want to see.
That's the kind of insufferable mental gymnastics we have heard from Trump Translators for the last 9 years.Wow!
But he was implying that because they were black, they didn't have the abilities to get where they are. Yes he was referring to these SPECIFIC black women THAT time, but he has FREQUENTLY suggested that any black person should have their capacity questioned because there is NO way they could be good enough to do that job.Nuance. I'm being told that Charlie Kirk didn't call all Black women low IQ people who lacked brain processing power, he was talking about specific individuals. To say otherwise is dishonest and deliberately taking his words out of context for a specific narrative and twisting them. I'm assuming the same nuance applies here.
Technically he isn't cancelled, according to ABC. This is "pre-empted indefinitely culture".You guys are celebrating having canceled a show no one was even watching?
Pfft.![]()
JB Pritzker Claims He Has Never Called Republicans 'Nazis' - Gets Proven Wrong by Videos of His Own Words | The Gateway Pundit | by Mike LaChance
Illinois Governor JB Pritzker recently claimed that he has never called Republicans ‘Nazis’ but that is a laughable suggestion.www.thegatewaypundit.com
This is an important time in our country. We need transparency in government and people like Pritzker need to be called out and held accountable. The violent rhetoric needs to stop.
Hmmm....maaaaybe this is a better way of expressing my thoughts....maybe.A political martyr, yes. A martyr who was a Christian, yes. But calling him a Christian martyr to me suggests he was martyred for the faith. That's not how I see it based upon what I have read.
But...there's no like "Ding"...."oooooh. I get it now" moment.Correct.
Acting lawfully seems to matter very little to the current US president.
Is it a "take" when someone asks you to clarify what you meant and you do so?It's a garbage take, because the "DEI" initiative in diversifying the pilot ranks was in getting more women and minorities into flight school, not in lowering the standards for them once they got there.
But hey, whatever is useful in stoking white resentment, eh?
I'm more inclined to say "See how much the right desired to take away our freedom?"See how easily we are willing to give away freedom?
You guys are celebrating having canceled a show no one was even watching?
Hence my (yet) unanswered request for historic verification of the existence of THE INVESTIGATIVE JUDGMENT doctrine prior to its revelation to Mrs. White.I read chapters 2 and 3 of the book because of this thread, and the nicest possible description I can give of the historical claims is "profoundly ignorant and totally unsubstantiated." Maybe EGW was limited by the books and people she had access to at the time. Modern SDAs do not have such an excuse for distributing falsehoods about the historicity of Sunday worship and belief in the Real Presence of our Lord in the Eucharist.
And at least The Trail of Blood puts some effort into identifying theoretical Baptist predecessors. EGW just kind of hand waves the problem and says there were anonymous true Christians throughout history who didn't venerate icons or worship on Sunday, without anything to back up the claim.
That cliche, widely and popularly invoked, is perfectly applicable to private actors but not government actors. Translation, the cliche isn’t applicable to the government as the 1st Amendment free speech clause exists to restrain the government from imposing “consequences” because of speech.Free speech doesn’t mean freedom from consequences.
A what? Before who counts what?Does he get a free racism before they count?