• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

The heavenly temple of 2 Thes 2.4

I am all for studying the Hebrew language.
I think they should teach the meaning of the letters in Kindergarten before they enter the first grade. They have preschool at three years of age, but that is more to teach social skills and how to get along with people. As it is not the superintendent of the school system would not pass my preschool entrance examine. My brother did his dissertation for his PhD on a preschool readiness examine and my father used my brothers examine with his patients.

Right now the school system is hooked on phonics so they can pronounce the words but half the time people do not pronounce the words right because they think it is cool to be ghetto or what they call hood today.
Upvote 0

How are we like Jesus in this world?

1 John 4:17 Love has been perfected among us in this: that we may have boldness in the day of judgment; because as He is, so are we in this world. 18 There is no fear in love; but perfect love casts out fear, because fear involves torment. But he who fears has not been made perfect in love.

From an Orthodox perspective, the answer would be Theosis, which is the process of our salvation enabled by the incarnation and triumphant passion of Christ our True God on the cross, and His victory over death, by which we are glorified and become by grace what He is by nature, being transformed from our current mortal and sinful existence through grace so that we will become eternal and sinless. And the process of this transformation begins in this life, and this is why St. James in his epistle writes that faith without works is dead - a living faith is one that entails Theosis, which John Wesley called “entire sanctification” and Martin Luther called “Christification.”
Upvote 0

Did the Logos have a human nature prior to the incarnation?

That's a matter of definitions of Logos and human nature. E.g., if you define Logos as a man, then by definition, Logos has a human nature.

I think most Christians would hold that something metaphysically special occurred in the incarnation?
Right. Jesus was born a human baby. By definition, Jesus has human nature. All humans have a human nature, again, by definition.

By these definitions, there is nothing to argue about.

Logos, as a purely divine witness, is not a man. He has no human nature in that sense. However, he temporarily took on human nature when he appeared as a human, as in a Christophany in the OT. Further, we are created in the image of God. Some aspects of our human nature reflect some aspects of divine nature.

By 'temporarily' I mean the divine Logos appeared in space-time's physical dimensions to interact with us as a physical human being for a short period of physical time.

I believe the resurrected Christ had acquired a glorified physical body according to glorified physics. He now has a permanent human nature as our intercessor.

I distinguish between the concepts of Christ and Logos even as they are the same witness. Don't conflate the two representations in a formal argumentation.

Irresistable Grace

No one is justified by works. That doesn't mean that we're prevented from saying "no" to salvation, "no" to God and His work in us. Either way, good fruit is the evidence that we're one of His.

Why do we need to be implored to be reconciled to Him even though reconciliation comes by the sacrifice of Christ?
That imperative isnt for everyone, but its to the new creature Vs 17 who has already been reconciled Vs 18-19, its bringing them to faith, its in the passive voice.
Upvote 0

Fall of man, I can't understand this

"Being me, the easiest to mention is that Adam and Eve, had they not sinned, would never have attained the glory and joy that the people of God will, upon their resurrection and glorification."

Yeah this makes even less sense to me now. They were supposed to sin to for a greater good? I thought the whole point was to turn from sin.
Well, before they sinned, they had no sin to turn from.
Also a little tripped out reading that God placed to the serpent in the garden and also made it basically said it was his most cunning(im assuming deceptive) creation.

This is seeming like one entire contradiction now again after you've mentioned they were supposed to sin to receive the glorification upon redemption.

Don't sin but sin. Don't be deceived yet be up again the most deceptive being I've ever created. Break time from this stuff for me..
You may remember the passage from Romans 6, "What then, should we sin that grace may abound? Of course not!" But, we do and it does. Thank God for his never-ending mercy and faithfulness to those he created for his special purpose.

Also, from Romans 8, "...the creation was subjected to frustration, not by its own choice, but by the will of the one who subjected it, in hope (the Greek translated 'hope', there, means, 'expectation') that the creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay and brought into the freedom and glory of the children of God." ( —By the way, there is a lot there in Romans that deals directly with the OP)
Man no wonder everything is so messed up.
We see it messed up. But, though we can't see this as fact, yet, it has already been restored to God —in fact, in much improved fashion.

God doesn't do time the way we do. From Colossians 1, "...through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether things on earth or things in heaven, by making peace through his blood, shed on the cross."

From Hebrews 2, "You have put in subjection all things under his feet. For in subjecting all things to him, He left nothing unsubject to him. But at present not yet do we see all things having been subjected to him."
Upvote 0

Gideon was beating out wheat in the WINEPRESS

r/BibleVerseCommentary - Gideon was beating out wheat in the WINEPRESS
Threshing was the process of separating grain kernels from their stalks and husks. Normally, this was done in an open, breezy place where the wind could help separate the grain from the chaff. But there was a problem - an open space like that could be seen easily.

In the case of Gideon, Judges 6:

11 The angel of the LORD came and sat under the terebinth at Ophrah, which belonged to Joash the Abiezrite, while his son Gideon was beating out wheat in the winepress to hide it from the Midianites.


r/BibleVerseCommentary - Gideon was beating out wheat in the WINEPRESS
This was how the Bible introduced our hero Gideon - not on a battlefield or in a palace, but hiding in a winepress, desperately trying to preserve his family's food.

Yet the very next verse contains a striking contrast:

12 And the angel of the Lord appeared to him and said to him, “The Lord is with you, O mighty man of valor.”
God does not see us superficially. He sees deep inside us.

God gives wicked rulers to rebellious nations - And He gives us choice to do good

God allows bad rulers for rebellious nations
Yes. And when a nation comes under judgment, so do the righteous suffer who are living within it.

I'm hoping it's not America's time for judgment, but I guess we shall soon see ...
  • Prayers
Reactions: Hazelelponi
Upvote 0

The very beginnings of the End Times What do you believe

Scripture is God's Word. It is Truth.

Science is man's efforts, of the world, not from heaven, not Godly .
Um, I was talking about history? The history of the church and how after Constantine became emperor and had his 'vision' he 'Christianized' the Roman empire. From then on it took over 1000 years for Christians to realise that we're not really meant to run government. You're not aware of this? These are just facts. They're not disputable. Never read any history hey?

Let alone science - which is a completely and utterly different subject. (I also think Christians have a duty to respect science as a source of truth almost as much as they respect the bible! But that's a different and more philosophical topic. Right now you seem to be struggling with history.)
Upvote 0

This priest’s 1952 doctoral thesis shows why it is better to vote for the lesser evil

Fr. Thomas Cranny submitted his doctoral dissertation 'The Moral Obligation of Voting' to Catholic University of America in 1952, and it includes a chapter on 'conditions under which one may vote for unworthy candidates.'

Continued below.
I couldn't resist a reply.

The scenario here is between bad candidate B and even worse candidate A. No other options other than not voting at all, at least as proposed in the article about the doctoral thesis. I have three theology degree doctoral theses on my bookshelf and they are all excellent works, but, sadly I have nothing at all by this author. So I don't know if he looked at the morality of voting for a write in candidate. So, from the article, A or B. In that scenario we should all be voting for B. You can vote for B to stop candidate A. In that one scenario.

But in a scenario where A (really bad) and B (almost as bad) and C (not bad but not polling well) are candidates, a scenario not mentioned in the article as far as I could find, I think we have a duty to vote for the least worst candidate. IMHO if A wins, it is not at all my fault. It IS the fault of people who voted for A. I have not cooperated with evil in not voting effectively against A. I have not formally or even remotely cooperated in evil. I have, in fact opposed evil. But if B wins, and I voted for B to stop A, I would have at least remotely cooperated in the evil of electing B. The solution is to vote for C. Those who vote for A or for B are morally complicit in who they have voted for. That can't be helped.

Going back to pre-election preparation for a messy election aftermath. Pantry stocked, cars gassed up, ready to hunker down. On Tuesday I work as an election judge in my precinct. My vote for Peter Sonski and Lauren Onak will be lost in the noise. Oh well. America will have spoken. We will get the government we deserve.
Upvote 0

Max Lucado

I googled the question, is Max Lucado a member of the Church of Christ? And it said, no, he’s a member of Oak Hills Church in San Antonio which was formerly known as a Church of Christ. It said that while it’s a COC it’s not a typical COC, which I guess I’d kind of a contradiction. I’m not too worried about it because my pastor gave his approval and when I was Lutheran our Bible Study group was given approval to read one of his books, too. If he says anything derogatory against the RCC I’ll just ignore it.
God bless
  • Friendly
Reactions: FaithT
Upvote 0

Trump trolls Harris, Biden with garbage truck press conference

Did I say that I see this in my neighborhood?
And speaking of your good garbage men, do you really think that the likes of Trump would give them any respect, at all, especially if they didn’t kiss his tushy?
You aren't wrong.

I don't care for either candidate, quite frankly.
Upvote 0

Can Harris pitch unrestricted abortion as 'debt reduction?'

I would prefer it if we banned abortion and euthanasia without destroying valuable military capabilities.

The death penalty, furthermore, is a necessary deterrent against mass murder, although I do favor limiting its application to murderers whose guilt is not disputed, including all prior murder convicts (we owe it to the inmates in the prison to reduce the risk of being maimed or murdered by another inmate, and as I see it the best way to do this is to reimagine life imprisonment as what one might call “vital probation”, with prisoners sentenced thus subject to termination if they were to kill another prisoner or attack another prisoner with homicidal intent using a bladed weapon.

What Field Marshal Sir Bernard Law Montgomery said regarding the Nuremberg trials is equally applicable to American justice with regards to that most frightening category of criminals, that of the murderers, killers, cutthroats and thugs, bloodthirsty and psychopathic, and that is, that even for such monsters, we must present justice that is firm but fair. Firm in that those who can be proven to carry guilt should be swiftly cut down by the sword of Justice, fair in that those where even some doubts exist, less than reasonable doubt, but the unlikeliest possibility of innocence, should be spared, but put on notice that should they harm a fellow prisoner, their probationary existence shall be brought to a swift and unsympathetic close.

I should also note in closing that there appears to exist in Scripture a positive commandment to execute murderers, and that such executions were viewed favorably by both Patristic authorities of the common Catholic and Orthodox heritage, as well as the Scholastic theologians unique to Roman Catholicism.
I agree abortion and euthanasia should be 100% banned.

I think the death penalty should be incredibly rare.

My opinion only

Blessings
  • Like
Reactions: The Liturgist
Upvote 0

The Mystery of What Confirmed My Faith

There are 2 ways ( I am aware of) of discerning things in the New Testament of what we hear in the general world. For ex. it is a good ethic to be kind to one another; this falls within what I believe St. Paul tells us in Philippians 4:8. Probably someone like Confucius expressed such a sentiment. If that person is not a Christian, they are not likely a deceiver.

On the other hand if someone claims to be Christian and tells you that Jesus Christ was an enlightened guy like Confucius, that person is either a deceiver or deluded. We need to test the spirits ( 1 John 4:1-3) but take care in doing so ( 2 Thessalonians 3:13-16, Matthew 10:16).

We are told to test all things and hold fast to what is good ( 1 Thessalonians 5:21-22). The old Christian creeds express a sound theology for anyone and are helpful as a guard against unsound preaching. For ex. the Apostles Creed:


As far as knowing Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior ( see Romans 10:9-13 etc.) and basic living by faith in the world and within our souls ( see Romans 13:1-14 etc.).
Upvote 0

How Can the Saints Hear a Million Prayers?

It seems a bit foolish to try to explain "knowing" in heaven using our temporal "understanding" of "knowing". There is no time in eternity; natural human reasoning is different even on earth from the supernatural gifts of the Spirit given to those advanced in prayer, when the seven-fold Gifts, or "spirits" of the Holy Spirit are activated in the soul through advanced prayer, called "mystical" prayer.

Ascetical prayer involves "natural" acts, processes, mental activity especially discursive meditation. But mystical prayer begins with spiritual realities that are infused and become active by the intervention of God. This supernatural activity, beginning with infused contemplation, is a state of intuitive knowing and understanding, radically different from the natural activities of ascetical prayer, for example discursive meditation involving coming to conclusions about truths through human reason and discernment. My point is, ascetical prayer is time-bound and time-grounded, directed toward rational conclusions; mystical prayer is more an event in a timeless moment of intuitive enlightenment. Earthly knowing is temporal, spacial; heavenly is timeless, unbounded.

The saints in heaven live in a reality very different from the constraints "normal" for us here.
Sometimes words just cannot really explain things 'supernatural' ...
but you've done a fine job in attempting to do so.

I appreciate your contributions here.
God bless.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,882,112
Messages
65,475,203
Members
276,604
Latest member
Ashley_wood