Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Here, verses in Romans 13 speaks about "Law (v8,10) and Commandment (v9)" only points to the Ten Commandments and nothing about statutes, when we shall love our neighbors.He did but those verses are speaking of His Spirit and does not limit the Commandments that were written on stone to be that which is placed in our hearts. We are given His Spirit that we walk in His Commandments and statutes, all His Way. Not just that which was written on stone. All righteousness.
God in the OT/YHWH was not always fully omniscient, and didn't start out that way. He's just as much a part of all of this determinism/time as much as we are right now currently, but who's true purpose is to allow God to be relational to us, and show us who God is, etc (along with Jesus Christ also, who also was not always fully omniscient/didn't start out that way 100%) (Hence that ones claims with being completely equal to YHWH, but not equal to this other One yet, etc) but all of this is also why things in the scripture are told to us from that perspective, etc, or the perspective of choice sometimes, etc. It is impossible for the One who is always fully omniscient to both relate to us or show himself to us without these others who are also locked into all of this determinism/time with us, etc, anyway, without these other ones, it is impossible for this other One to make himself known, and/or relate/show himself to us. It is the one and only limitation with this One's always knowing/predetermining all from the beginning, or making the universe/this reality this way, etc.I reject the claim that divine omniscience requires a universe with only one possible pathway, because Scripture shows God knowing future free choices without causing or predetermining them—Christ foreknows Peter’s denial (Luke 22:34) and Judas’s betrayal (John 13:11) even though both acts remain morally responsible, proving that foreknowledge does not equal predetermination. The Church teaches the same: “God’s eternal plan includes the free response of each person to His grace” (CCC 600), meaning God infallibly knows contingent futures precisely because His knowledge is not bound by time—“for Him all things are present to His eyes” (CCC 600; cf. 2 Peter 3:8). The argument you quoted falsely assumes God must reason discursively like a creature, but Catholic dogma insists God’s knowledge is simple, eternal, and immediate (CCC 202; 216), so He does not predict possibilities—He beholds all moments of history in a single act of knowing. Scripture explicitly denies that God predestines anyone to damnation: “God desires all men to be saved” (1 Tim 2:4), “not wishing that any should perish” (2 Peter 3:9), and Christ weeps over Jerusalem’s refusal of grace (Matt 23:37), which would be incoherent if their rejection were predetermined. Thus, the claim that omniscience requires absolute determinism collapses: God’s perfect knowledge does not eliminate human freedom, because He knows free acts as free, contingent acts as contingent, and His foreknowledge does not impose necessity upon them - “those whom He foreknew He also predestined” (Rom 8:29), meaning predestination follows foreknowledge, not the other way around.
Yes, a compact still is an agreement between two parties.A covenant can be a disposition (e.g. a last will/testament) or a compact.
Those are judgements, not included in the Ten Commandments or God's Law.Jesus himself, even during his earthly ministry, changed some of what the law said (e.g. instead of an eye for an eye, he told us to turn the other cheek).
Yes, as God's Laws written in our heart, the ministry of the Spirit is more glorious. (2Cor 3:3,8 Heb 8:8-13))The New Covenant is not a set of rules and regulations, but life in the Holy Spirit, being led by him.
Is it wrong to call the old covenant the ministry of death? No, because that is what the law does to us: It slays us as guilty sinners before God so that we can be resurrected by the new covenant. It isn’t that the problem was with the law, but with us: The sinful passions which were aroused by the law were at work in our members to bear fruit to death. (Rom 7:5)The law is the ministry of death, as 2 Cor. 3:7 says (and you quoted it), because it reveals and stirs up sin, then shows everyone under it to be guilty.
The ten commandments were written in stone, by the hand of God. They are the ministry of death and condemnation, as the Bible states.
Yes, when we always follow the guidance of the Spirit without opting on our own, we'll be free from the Law, means freed from sinning and became slaves of righteousness. (Rom 7:6, Rom 6:18)Trying to live by the ministry of death and condemnation is not good works; it is dead works, from which we need to repent. It is attempting to produce one's own righteousness,by works of the law; rather than looking away to Jesus, the Author and Finisher of our faith, and walking in step with the Holy Spirit.
No one will become righteous by our own works, as we always fall short to the glory of God.Trying to be righteous, by works of the law, will not keep anyone from the second death. We are kept from the second death by God's unmerited favour, through faith in Jesus Christ. The Holy Spirit leads us to bear good fruit (love, joy, peace, etc.).
Yes, by God's grace we are saved through our faith, it is in that way that we keep His commandments being the result of being saved, not to be save.God works in Christians to will and to do of his good pleasure. It is in this way that we keep his commandments, not by trying to do the works of the law.
Per your question, what is allowed…Interesting.
The Prodigal Son didn't negotiate a behavior modification plan in the pig pen.This be true, but that's their choice.
Well as only one commandment truly matters on these websites, ''Thou shalt not admit to error'' one shouldn't always take discussions too seriouslyFor some discussion is a sport it seems.
I hope you present your attitude to your confessor and repent of it. This is not the Orthodox Christian response to suffering.I, for one, hope my mutilators, because they cannot be called parents due to what they did, will suffer terribly and I hope they die alone in some agonizing way because they 'circumcised' me. This should be the normal reaction to the extreme cruelty and evil of the practice
Yes, for the forth time.Ooo, like this?
I'm going with "lying".She is either lying or terribly mistaken.
Unless these symbols lead you to think about what they mean, (in vivid detail), what is it about them that seems to “trouble” you?My workplace has recently put up a bunch of pride flags over the building and stuck stickers over the desk. If your employee did this what would you do.
Also how do you react when apps you use decorate the wholehomepage with prode flags? And how do you react when neighbours display pride flags outside their homes