Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
On the contrary, it is extremely unusual for the president to disinvite certain governors from the annual scheduled governors conference.Nothing unusual here. Presidents of both parties have invited meetings with groups of people of their own party plenty of times in the past.
Here's just one example: Obama Invites House Democrats to White House
FWIW, I think Jesus is showing how the law is meant to condemn all of mankind as worthy of death. It's like The Creator can't give the creature a virtue without the creature inevitably taking it as its own in some measure of vainglory rather than sincere thankfulness. Hence, I think Jesus is showing the true standard for condemnation of the flesh NOT to occur. If I'm wrong, then it seems to me that fidelity as a positive virtue would be built upon the negative substrate of the fear of eternal fire, not the sincere love of God. And this brings forth the question, what does a true repentance look like that would lead to remission?But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart
So if a believer has an impure thought, they need to repent of it before they die or they end up in hell?
The new, Canadian financed bridge is the Gordie Howe International Bridge and the older bridge is the Ambassador Bridge.Thank you for providing the name of at least one of the bridges.
Poor billionaire.
He complained last term as well.The new bridge has been under construction for several years now. A bit late to start complaining about it now that hundreds of millions of dollars have already been spent and it's nearing completion. He should have complained during the first Trump administration if he wanted to complain.
And IT. is easy for me , because in each case the Greek for WATER // HYDOR. is NOT in. the GREEK TEXT.1 Corinthians 12: 13. For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.”
Galatians 3: 27. For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.”
Romans 6: 3. Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?”
Finally, arguments about the Gaza War’s death toll miss the real point. If a ruling regime starts a war, it is putting its citizens at risk. If it doesn’t have the resources to protect them, it puts those innocents at greater risk. Of course, if the belligerent regime hides behind its civilians—in their residences, places of worship, healthcare facilities, schools—it puts its population at a supremely high risk of death Presuming that the defending party exclusively targets only fighters of the belligerent regime—as Israel did—untold civilians will be killed anyway, and responsibility for those deaths lies fully with the belligerent regime.
Why arguments over blame for Gaza War deaths are nonsense. When a country like Israel is attacked, unprovoked, in a massacre by its bordering neighbor, such as Hamas did on October 7, 2023, there’s little question of responsibility for the conflagration. Hamas was the aggressor. When that aggressor fails to take precautions to protect its citizens in case of war, as Hamas failed to do, responsibility is again clear. Finally, if the aggressor uses a war strategy of human shields—deliberately operating within or around its civilian population, in residences, schools, mosques and hospitals—which is a war crime, we have a trifecta of unforgivable barbarism.
I had some other thoughts about this. Hope this helps.I've been going back and forth on this topic for a few years now and I'm not sure how to rectify some stuff when it comes to end-time prophecy. I'd love to hear some arguments for and against or even going in a weird direction...
1. 144,000
Now, it makes sense to me that the church as a group would be considered apart of the 144,000 due to:
- 12 tribes are listed and the ones that had idolatry issues are excluded. This gives the idea that the 12 tribes listed are the purified ones essentially, so as a "whole" status.
- They are called first fruits (Which using the farming term, they would be the first saved/protected during the trib before the rest of the harvest comes in)
2. So the fact that 144,000 incorporates everyone within God's tree makes sense apart from 1 problem...
- Us being grafted in
- Ethnicity was done away with (there is neither jew nor gentile)
- The only ones who are saved are saved through Christ
- If only ethnic Jews are considered part of the 144,000, then you're essentially saying no gentile could be a "first fruit"
- If this is only ethnic Jews, then you're saying God is going back to favor ethnicity over spiritual wholeness and Pauls analogies no longer apply
- If this is only ethnic Jews then the idea that there is a 2 class system emerges where God favors ethnic Jews over gentiles.
So how do you rectify the two, or cant you?
- What tribe are the gentiles apart of?
Side note:
I don't subscribe to the idea that the "church" just doesn't exist in the trib because that's essentially saying you're tossing out the entire new testament. People are going to be saved during this time period, they just might not live through it. So if the "church" represents the new covenant of people turning to Christ, then it will always be around.
I cannot explain it any different than what I just posted.Going back to the question of the OP, what doctrine is perhaps the most misconstrued, who is misconstruing it, and how are they misconstruing it? Please don't take offense at these questions because I am honestly trying to understand.
It's my understanding that the teachings of the Brethren mostly concern spiritual growth in the "image of Christ" (Rom 8:29; 2Co 3:18). Some of your critique could be accurate, but Stoney, like many of the Brethren a few centuries ago were more advanced spiritually than most, and discerned that the average Christian among God's children have been less mature than they could be.Certainly, he does not have insight into the thoughts and intents of other people's hearts so that he can say with certainty that the first category of person "usually" has a "proportionally feeble" "appreciation of Christ as Savior" as compared with the second.
And this point of view is not doctrinally sound either. When people are rescued by Christ from the penalty for their sins, it does not much matter how bad a sinner they were. They are all rescued from the same penalty -- eternal damnation from the presence of the Lord. And they all know they deserve the punishment and they all turn to Christ for relief. And when that relief is granted, it does not stand to reason that those in the first category have a relatively feeble appreciation of Christ as Savior compared to those in the second.
Sorry, the overwhelming amount of scripture devoted to the fact that salvation is not for all, vs. the few that speaks more to the nature of God’s heart rather than them being the deciding factor in salvation and outliers to the rest of God’s plan for salvation means that they are just as I claim. God wishes, because we are all God’s creation, that we could all come to salvation, but we are not all God’s children. And salvation is only for God’s children (the elect).