"No More Wars" Trump Requesting $72 Billion for the Iran War
- By Landon Caeli
- American Politics
- 29 Replies
Yeah I AM!But... If you have no idea, there isn't a message and you aren't a messenger.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yeah I AM!But... If you have no idea, there isn't a message and you aren't a messenger.
It is vast sums as direct compensation straight to the descendents of the victims I am a bit more cautious about.In Australia, the comparable issue is about reconciliation between Indigenous and non-Indigenous folks. My observation is that we are, as a church, so far at least trying to be good at talking the talk, trying less to be good at solid concrete action.
But I would push back, slighly, on the idea that you don't need money to do things like challenge racism. I've seen successful programmes aimed at challenging sexism, and sure, you need the Spirit to be at work to make that happen, but it seems to help if you have resources; teaching resources, small group resources, paid staff who can run workshops and do research and so on. Money can definitely help.
I get it... End-times theologies are bad. I agree.The Iranian end time scenario (Twelver Shi'ite eschatology - Mahdism) involves the obliteration of Israel and a full - scale attack on Jerusalem. This eschatology is being actively and violently pursued by the Iranian regime. The possession of nukes simply adds scale to the ongoing conflict.
The Saudi Royal Family have distanced themselves from pure Wahabism recently and take a more secular nationalistic approach. But at root they hold that Jesus will return to wage war against the Anti-Christ and ultimately the Mahdi will return and make all things right. There is a violent element in the Saudi theology also but it is not as extreme as that of Iran and it waits for the appropriate leader to arrive rather than proactively trying to preempt that like the Iranians are doing - the reason in fact for much of the instability in the region in the last decades.
Christian eschatology talks about the return of Jews to Israel and a general conversion to the Messiah, it asks for evangelism and faith on believers parts not proactive aggression to see Gods objectives achieved. So nothing like either Iran or Saudi Arabia.
Love excludes sin, fulfilling the law by its nature regardless of whether or not we’ve even heard the law. This is why John can also tell us, in his letters, that those who continue in sin and who don’t love don’t even know God.John chapter 7 verse 19
Has not Moses given you the law? Yet not one of you keeps the law. Why are you trying to kill me?”
Galatians chapter 6 verses 13
Not even those who are circumcised keep the law, yet they want you to be circumcised that they may boast about your circumcision in the flesh.
1 John chapter 1 verse 8
If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us.
2 chronicles chapter 6 verse 36
“When they sin against you—for there is no one who does not sin—and you become angry with them and give them over to the enemy, who takes them captive to a land far away or near;
1 Kings chapter 8 verse 46
“When they sin against you—for there is no one who does not sin—and you become angry with them and give them over to their enemies, who take them captive to their own lands, far away or near;
Ecclesiastes chapter 7 verse 20
Indeed, there is no one on earth who is righteous, no one who does what is right and never sins.
James chapter 2 verse 10
For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it.
(Some would say)
Hebrews chapter 10 verse 26
If we deliberately keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth, no sacrifice for sins is left,
Matthew chapter 9 verse 13
But go and learn what this means: ‘I desire mercy, not sacrifice.’ For I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners.”
Galatians chapter 5 verse 4
You who are trying to be justified by the law have been alienated from Christ; you have fallen away from grace.
(here is how to be justified)
James chapter 2 verse 13
because judgment without mercy will be shown to anyone who has not been merciful. Mercy triumphs over judgment.
1 Peter chapter 4 verse 8
Above all, love each other deeply, because love covers over a multitude of sins.
Proverbs chapter 11 verse 17
Those who are kind benefit themselves, but the cruel bring ruin on themselves.
Proverbs chapter 10 verse 12
Hatred stirs up conflict, but love covers over all wrongs.
The starship had a soft landing as evidenced by the absence of an explosion and the obvious intact condition.Looks like both booster and starship came back to earth with a hard landing. I believe they are going to attempt to catch both booster and ship portions for Starship 14 sometimes this fall.
Login to view embedded media
holymanna.blog
catholicjournal.us
catholicjournal.us
holymanna.blog
I think you critiqued @Hans Blaster for his careless reading of one or more of your comments. You might wish to put your own house in order. It is patently obvious that you have failed to understand that to Hans and, I suggest, to most scientists, a scientific discussion is one held between scientists about a scientific topic, in a scientific manner It does not involve non-scientists. Scientific discussions do not occur on Christian Forums. Discussions about science do. Those can readily involve mention of gods. On this forum their inclusion is almost mandatory. Hans' position that gods are not necessary for the practice of science remains accurate.I’ll stop there. I grew tired of chasing the inanity in this response. If there is a specific argument buried in it that you want addressed, make it clear. Otherwise, I am done.
Any “invention” that allows people to lie to themselves more convincingly, is going to be a hit, until it’s not.It's like writing a story about yourself in a relationship with the person of your dreams. It can be fun and if it fullfills a need of someone, I'm not going to judge them or try to convince them that they should stop enjoying themselves. But it's not terribly impressive, either.
I can't agree with your 8 BCE conclusion—I think it contradicts other evidence concerning the Nativity—but I commend you for at least calculating the dates correctly. Few ever do. Although, there is compelling evidence to suggest that August 4th isn't the correct date for the temple's destruction, which necessarily affects how the dates extrapolate backward.June 14-21, 8 BC = JD 1,718,666-73.
While burning incense before God in the Holy Place of the Temple, Zacharias is visited by Gabriel, who promises him the birth of a son that will be “filled with the Holy Spirit…in the spirit and power of Elijah…” Lk. 1:5f. This week of June 14-21, 8 BC, was the period when Zacharias’ “course of Abijah” served in the Temple. Lk. 1:5
The likely date for this event was June 15, a Sunday, the true day of Pentecost in 8 BC. Zacharias’ service in the Temple ended on Saturday morning, June 21. If his home was any distance from Jerusalem, he would not have begun his journey there before the morning of June 22, because it was unlawful to journey on the Sabbath. The Summer solstice began on the evening of June 24, two days after the Full Moon: a reasonable conjecture for the date of John’s conception.
The service of the Levitical priesthood in the Temple had been divided into 24 courses by King David. 1 Chr. 24:3f. Josephus recorded that each course served for one week. Ant. Vil:xiv:7 The Mishna says that each course began at the evening sacrifice of a Sabbath, and ended at the morning sacrifice of the following Sabbath; in this case, evening June 14 to morning June 21. m. Sukka 5:8; m. Tamid 5:1
This week in 8 BC of the course of Abijah is determined from biblical and extra-biblical sources. Jesus was born on the Autumn equinox, September 25, 7 BC. Mary’s conception of Him took place about or exactly six months after Elizabeth’s conception of John; see below. Therefore, Jesus was born about or exactly 6 + 9 = 15 months after John was conceived, meaning that John was conceived near or on the Summer solstice of 8 BC.
According to Seder ’Olam Rabbah 30:86-97, “Rabbi Yose [ben Halafta; ca. 150 AD] used to say… When the temple was destroyed, the first time, that day was immediately after the Sabbath, it was immediately after the Sabbatical year, it was (during the service of) the priestly division of Jehoiarib, and it was the ninth day of Ab; and so the second time (the temple was destroyed).”1
The priestly division of Jehoiarib was the first course. 1 Chr. 24:7 The ninth of Ab (fifth month) in 70 AD, the year the Second Temple was destroyed, fell on Sunday, August 5. Therefore, the course of Jehoiarib began on Saturday, August 4. If the Temple hadn’t been destroyed, the course of Abijah, the eighth course (1 Chr. 24:10), would have begun seven weeks later, therefore on September 22, 70.
The full cycle of 24 courses lasted 7 days x 24 = 168 days. Precisely 168 cycles of 168 days each before September 22, 70 AD was the day June 14, 8 BC, when Zacharias’ course of Abijah commenced.
132. The Chronology of the New Testament, Part 1: Jesus and John the Baptist, Conceptions to Callings https://www.worthychristianforums.c...and-john-the-baptist-conceptions-to-callings/