end the filibuster?
- By dogs4thewin
- American Politics
- 4 Replies
same could apply if democrats are in power there is a reason for the 60 votes and that goes for BOTH parties. I am sure that at some point in the 200+ years of this country for at least two years one party has had 60 votes ( or whatever the number was at the time before there were 50 states. It is not like it is 90 votes or anything.The 60 vote supermajority is our only hope of getting the parties to work together now and in the future.
We've seen the crazed ideologues planted in the courts by the Federalist Society, which has rewritten the meaning of the Constitution to match its oligarchial goals. This would never have happened in the past, although a few snuck through (Thomas, Alito.)
Although I'd be thrilled to see no filibuster when Democrats are in power, the potential for damage is overwhelming at the current time.
The failed experiment of ending the filibuster for judicial appointments will make our country suffer for generations.
Upvote
0