Don Sr. Skips Don Jr.'s Wedding
- By RileyG
- American Politics
- 43 Replies
Yeah, I should have hyphenated it. Make it easier to read.I did the same when reading it. That's why compound words are hyphenated: father-in-law.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yeah, I should have hyphenated it. Make it easier to read.I did the same when reading it. That's why compound words are hyphenated: father-in-law.


Can you find anywhere in the Nicene or ante-Nicene Fathers where the unity of the Church is placed in a shared subset of beliefs between different sects? It seems abundantly clear to me that unity in the sense it's intended in the Creed refers to being in communion with the visible, orthodox hierarchy of the Church, and this with the understanding that the visible Church is not a human institution but a divine one, "the institution of God" (St. Ignatius, Ep. Smyrnaeans 8).Do we place the locus of the Church's oneness in her external structures of human authority, or in the grace and work of God by which we are brought to faith, plunged into the Mystery of Christ by Baptism. This does not, at all, suggest we minimize or consider certain things (such as whether the Eucharist is the true body and blood of Christ or some memorial meal); but it does present a question of whether the Unam of Christ's Body is chiefly in the Mystery of Grace in Word and Sacrament, or in human institutionalism (without denying the importance of human institutionalism).
At least in part it's that the Church is divinely instituted and divinely guided. A human institution is not holy.What renders the Church as holy?
Is your position that no church can claim to be catholic as long as there are Trinitarians in schism from it? What does the existence of schisms have to do with any claims of catholicity?So what does it truly mean to be catholic? Does Rome get to claim a monopoly when the ancient Sees of Constantinople, Antioch, Alexandria, and Jerusalem reminds Rome that the Councils and Canons don't allow for that? Does Constantinople get to claim a monopoly, even as Alexandria (e.g.) remains non-Chalcedonian?
You've presented a false dichotomy between apostolic succession and fidelity to apostolic teaching when apostolicity derives from both: there were Arian bishops with a line of succession going back to the Apostles, but they weren't part of the Apostolic Church, and St. Clement praises the faith of the Corinthians while condemning them for their usurpation of presbyters who have apostolic succession. St. Irenaeus argues against Gnostics who claim to hold the apostolic faith by pointing to the apostolic succession of the episcopate. The two go hand in hand.And what of apostolicity? Is apostolicity found exclusively in the historic episcopate? ...Or should we instead discover true apostolicity in fidelity to the apostolic teaching.
The image is from the Gimbal video taken in 2015 and released in 2020.If nothing else, it is not a new photo.