Four letters Rabbit game for Rabbits...Fun!!!!!:D
- By lucypevensie
- Recreation Room
- 315 Replies
Irate monkeys are LOUD.
LOUD
LOUD
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So as long as it’s not pedophilia, by which you presumably mean here sex with anyone under 18, it’s really OK? If that’s your standard then Bill was cool too. Maybe. Then nothing sordid happened.It's not the whodunit that one may think. See the folks keep thinking that someone who is adulterous is automatically a pedophile. They are 2 very different behaviors if you open up an abnormal psych text. That goes for Clinton is well. Pedofilia is a much different problem & frankly I don't think Trump or Clinton fit that bill. The reason why it's played up so much is because the people are acting on emotion, not cogent arguments. They want it to be true. Now we do know that some of the victims have already received a payout. If there was an unusually young female, I doubt very much that 25 years later they would remember any particular details.
Waiting
Well, having a person killed because I coveted his wife should render a strong judgement against me by anyone of good will, I should think.To grasp the sense of much of the OT requires a full knowledge of scripture and the themes that emerge. This can take years of devotionally reading Scripture and nothing else.
It seems that while David is a favourite role model taught to believers at a young age for killing Goliath, his performance as King was rather wanting. Yet Jesus will take His place on the Throne of David like no earthly King could including David himself.
This indicates that Kingship was meant to be a spiritual role and leadership is meant to be a service rather than to be served.
Saul was the peoples King and human kingship was never the Father's plan A.
Those who read 2 Samuel are unlikely to read it to their children, what ensued under David reign was utter debauchery and grieved God deeply.
David was unable to take the responsibility of building the temple because of the blood on his hands.
Yet in all this David had a genuinely sensitive relationship with God - reflected in the Psalms and is one of God's favourites.
This causes us to think again about how we judge people.
Your pondering on this matter and sharing thoughts greatly appreciated.
Just like water circling a drain, right?The only point was that the spiral design and effect of galaxies means that the stars etc are spiraling down to the center of the galaxy or spiraling outward from the center and not hop scotching around from spiral arm to spiral arm as old age macro-evolutionists purport.
I think what I was meaning is that the organisational element is secondary. I am not refering to the Romantics, but the New Testament metaphor of the Vine and the Branches. Churches are fellowships too. There needs be some organisation of affairs but they not an organisation in the modern sense like in William Whyte's "The Organisation Man". That sort of managerialism is not IMO what church leadership should imitate. Leadership involves spiritual gifting.
Yes John was under the old covenant, and like all the diverse washings and carnal ordinances they were imposed upon them until the time of reformation. We also know that without the shedding of blood their is no remission of sins. So to dunk under water did not remit sins. If they were repentant towards God in their hearts they could be forgiven based upon the work of Christ in time. This is similar to when the lamb was sacrificed in the temple. The lamb represented Christ death for their sins in the future. But they had to sacrifice the lamb and confess sin etc God would recognize their faith and give life. But the lamb was a old testament type and shadow of the reality in Christ that has already come.John the Baptist's purpose & baptism were preparatory, not remissive. His repeatedly stated mission was to prepare the way of the Lord (Mal 3:1, Matt 3:3, Mark 1:2–3). His "baptism of repentance" was a call for Israel to return to God (Strong’s H7725 — https://biblehub.com/hebrew/7725.htm)—an outward & inward cleansing that prepared the people to meet their long‑promised Messiah who alone would forgive sins. John, Jesus & Peter spoke Aramaic & Hebrew, where "repent" meant: ISRAEL return to GOD! Not the later Greek idea of "change your mind."
Acts 19:4 confirms this: "John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people that they should believe on Him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus."
(NOTE: John preached to ISRAEL, "You're off course repent/return & believe in the 1 coming after me," Messiah, who alone will/can remit & pardon sins.)
John's water baptism did not remove or remit sin. "Nothing external removes sin." Israel's sacrificial system dealt with sin only by covering it. It did not remove or forgive sin. Once a year the high priest offered innocent animal blood sacrifices for the whole nation, but these sacrifices only covered sin & only for 1 year. The process had to be repeated annually..
Water baptism does not remit or pardon sin. Repentance does not remit or pardon sin. Obedience does not remit or pardon sin. Sabbath observance does not remit or pardon sin. Tithing does not remit or pardon sin. "Nothing external removes sin."
What removes sin, how & why:
Only faith & faith alone-placed in the finished, sin‑redeeming death & resurrection of the Lord Jesus-brings forgiveness. All glory, all credit, all praise belongs to our great God & Savior, Jesus the Christ.
The Word became flesh (Jn 1:1, 14 & Rev 19:13), born of a woman (Gal 4:4) by the Holy Spirit (Matt 1:18-25 & Luke 1:26-38). His humanity was real & His blood was sinless (2 Cor 5:21; Heb 4:15; 1 Jn 3:5; 1 Pet 1:19; 1 Pet 2:22).
Scripture is clear: "Without shedding of blood there is no remission" (Heb 9:22). Jesus said, "This is My blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins" (Matt 26:28). Revelation affirms the same: He washed us from our sins in His own blood (Rev 1:5).
Hebrews identifies the Lord Jesus as our great High Priest (Heb 4:14), called by God after the order of Melchizedek (Heb 5:10). Under the Old Covenant, the pattern was sin-imputation by the high priest. In Leviticus 16:21, Aaron laid both hands on the substitute, confessed the sins of the nation, transferring-imputing-those sins onto the innocent victim. That was the foreshadow.
Jesus is the fulfillment.
Jesus is the mediator of the New Testament (Heb 9:15 & 12:24), our great High Priest (Heb 4:14) & the One who offered Himself as the sacrifice (Matt 26:53). The risen Christ is the New Covenant High Priest who performs the real sin-transfer.
When we call on the name of the Lord (Acts 2:21 & Rom 10:13) & place our faith in Jesus' sin-atoning death & resurrection, He forgives all our sins (Heb 10:10–18) & imputes our sins onto Himself (Heb 10:10; 2 Cor 5:19; Rom 4:8, 11, 22–24). At that same moment, He places His forever (Jn 14:16), salvation‑sealing (Eph 1:13–14; 4:30; 2 Cor 1:22; 5:5; 2 Tim 1:14) indwelling Holy Spirit in you.
Anyone can dunk someone into a pool of water. Only Jesus, who knows the true heart of man, can baptize-place-His Holy Spirit in-you. Jesus then imputes His righteousness to us (2 Cor 5:21, Ja 2:23 & Isa 61:10), the very righteousness pictured as the white robe in Revelation 19:7–8 that grants us entrance to the marriage supper of the Lamb.
Finally:
The only thing that removes sin from the soul is faith placed in the finished, sacrificial, sin‑atoning work of our great God & Savior, Jesus Christ. Amen.
how nice for him. Glad to hear it.
- @MarkRohfrietsch is a Lutheran and thus his church chose to prioritize Scripture over Western errors over five centuries ago.
Yeah but usually those gaps are short term memory and mostly fuzzy when the trauma occurred.Nope. Memory gaps are consistent with head trauma.
Why wouldn't they empathize and sympathize and have compassion towards other alcoholics? They have been through what recovering alcoholics have suffered.As alcoholics themselves, they would sympathize, not empathize with other alcoholics, right?