• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The Rapture theory is true?

But the Bible does show exact 2000 year periods between Adam to Abram and from Abraham to Jesus. Now; almost another 2000 years since Jesus. These are facts, historical and logical.
Then we are told about the one thousand years when King Jesus will reign over the physical earth. Making a 7000 year total of Gods Plan for mankind.

Note; that God never 'raptured' the early Christian martyrs, or any Christians being killed for their faith now. This simple fact totally destroys the whole false idea of a removal to heaven for anyone.
Hi keras,

It seems to me that Jesus only returns bodily to earth once more, and it is at the end of time, and then the Judgment will begin in the Valley of Jehoshaphat. (Joel 4:12) Jesus' kingdom is not a physical earthly kingdom. It seems to me that many people think that the thousand years mentioned in the Book of Revelation is literal, but the other Scriptures do not show this.

Hebrews 9:28 so also Christ, offered once to take away the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to take away sin but to bring salvation to those who eagerly await him.

2 Timothy 4:1 I charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who will judge the living and the dead, and by his appearing and his kingly power:


2 Timothy 4:8 From now on the crown of righteousness awaits me, which the Lord, the just judge, will award to me on that day, and not only to me, but to all who have longed for his appearance.

1 Timothy 6:13-15 I charge [you] before God, who gives life to all things, and before Christ Jesus, who gave testimony under Pontius Pilate for the noble confession, 14 to keep the commandment without stain or reproach until the appearance of our Lord Jesus Christ 15 that the blessed and only ruler will make manifest at the proper time, the King of kings and Lord of lords,
Upvote 0

So, What Would a Vance Administration Be Like?

Without the looming threat of Trump giving him the "Pence treatment" and sending the MAGA-hounds after him, I think he'd basically be a George W Bush style republican.

Which means, he certainly still wouldn't be popular among Democrats, but would represent a move back toward "normalcy" in the eyes of a lot of folks.


But the question is, would he be able to win without the "Trumpy stuff"?

I think the verdict is out on that one... That would largely depend on who his opponent was.

If the Democrats run an AOC, then a "conventional republican" wins.
I think the Berniecrat faction of the Democatic party understand that they have to play a longer game than that.
If the Democrats run a Gavin Newsom, then a republicans would likely have to embrace some "Trumpy stuff" to beat him.
That would be his best chance. Don't forget, he is a Roman Catholic which would perhaps encourage him to put a kindlier face on the "Trumpy stuff." Some of Trump's policies are popular even with centrists and would be even more so shorn of their "revenge on the libs" trappings.
Upvote 0

Is it supposed to be lonesome?

I moved parishes to somewhere where the rhetoric from the pulpit, and the community attitudes, were healthier. Not perfect, mind you, but healthier.

You might find it helpful to connect with like-minded folks online? Follow some blogs or FB pages which are egalitarian - I can recommend some, and I'm sure others can as well - and feel like you're part of a bigger community that way?
Upvote 0

The Art of (Epstein) Distraction

We don't actually all know that . Just because lots of people clearly have it in for Trump you cannot assume everybody does
Those LOTS of people include Democrat politicians and Democrat media. Are you trying to tell me that NONE if them would? You know better than that.
Also if people might not want anything related to Epstein to be released to protect an intelligence asset.
I think that is a reasonable consideration. The whole Trump narrative is not.
The bigger issue is the broken promise of getting justice for the victims of pedophiles
Most certainly. Epstien killing himself kind of ruined that.
  • Like
Reactions: A New Dawn
Upvote 0

Hows everyone doing mentally?

There's nothing wrong with enjoying things in your life. Putting God first is what I need to do more often. I can't think how that would be "annoying/tiring". To me it is more of a mental thing. I recognize He is sovereign and try not to do things that are against His will, but I don't feel it is overly restrictive, He wants us to be happy and do what is best for us.
Upvote 0

Columbia University to fork over $220 million to resolve antisemitic discrimination claims

Not necessarily, To believe that would require one to believe that the present state of Israel is the fulfillment of God's biblical promise to the Jews, a position not taken by all Jews.
That’s not true. Anti-Semitic just means anti-Jew. The pro Palestine activists that took over the library at Columbia University were simply anti Jew. I don’t see how this has anything to do with biblical promises.
Upvote 0

Hows everyone doing mentally?

I'm here to ask how everyone is doing and also ask for advice for my own problems. It seems like no matter what I do a lot of times my brains knee jerk reaction is to think I shouldn't because (insert reason tied to sin or feelings) whether it's listening to music, playing games or doing really any general activities. Another thing i notice is before I do something I feel inclined to put God first in some way. I'm not saying we shouldn't be putting God first in our lives buts it's just the way I do it can be a bit annoying/tiring i guess. I tend to ignore those thoughts and feelings but it's still a daily thing I wish could go away. Its also hard for me to test the spirits because for all I know it's just my own inner voice speaking what I want to hear when asking if the spirit professes that Christ Jesus came in the flesh. These are just some of the problems I deal with but there still annoying and tiring. How's everyone else though? Any positive progress with your issues?

Is the ESV still popular?

Formal equivalence isn't word for word. Sentence structure is different in English than Greek or Hebrew, and there are idioms and other cases where some level of interpretation is needed to be intelligble. ESV may be a bit more literal, particularly beginning half the sentences in the Gospel with "and". But it's still formal equivalent, not literal.

See Is the ESV Literal and the NIV Gender Neutral? - Mondays with Mounce… for an attempt to be more accurate in characterizing translations.
Formal equivalence is a translation approach that prioritizes preserving the exact wording, grammatical structure, and syntax of the source text in the target language. It aims to maintain a close, literal correspondence to the original language, often used in contexts like legal, technical, or religious texts where precision and fidelity to the source are critical. For example, in Bible translation, formal equivalence seeks to reflect the original Hebrew or Greek as closely as possible, even if the result may sound less natural in the target language. This contrasts with dynamic equivalence, which focuses on conveying the meaning and intent in a more natural, idiomatic way.

My list however was in response to the OP.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,873,929
Messages
65,342,177
Members
276,125
Latest member
I-Josh82