That would be the sensible answer.
But that doesn't stop me from finding out from experts lol. I do have two eyes and a brain to read lol and understand when someone says the vases involved lathing and then I see the evidence directly on the vases.
That would not.
Th232 is less radioactive than either major uranium isotope as it has a LONGER HALFLIFE.
Yeah like I said I am not a physicist or geologist.
While the Egyptians perferred granite could be higher in concentration in radio isotopes, I don't why all of the granite used to make modern vases would not. Some, sure, all, doubtful.
Ok so we have one small identifyer that is different to modern vases. By collecting their small markers we can make a case for the vases being genuine.
Does Dr. Max think the genuine vases got on Putin's bad side? That's the only way I know to get a large amount of Po-210 (and Putin only use 0.01 mg which itself was "overkill"). So much for Dr. Max's credibility.
I'm sorry, but I have to re-rate "Dr. Max" as an unserious nutjob at this point. Dr. Max might have just as well said:
View attachment 372359
Note to Steve: This is not claiming anything about *YOU*, but the sources you just cited have fallen into the "ancient aliens" level of credibility. Try to do better than them. You seem like a decent guy. You don't need these grifters.
And the way everything is dismissed as whacko is a hallmark of hyper skeptics and cynics lol. I think this is Dr Max's specialist area. Yet you have the hyde to claim you know more. JUst after you congradulated me for knowing my lane you jump out of yours lol.
The same minerals and rock types from different places do have chemical and isotopic signatures. Is there any analysis of such with pre-dynastic vases?
Maybe, I know that the metals in stone vase fragments was done. Oh look it was done by Dr Max. There goes all that data lol. Nevertheless you can't make up metals in stone if the detector picks it up.
One thing they did not find is any copper. No copper tools used. But they did find tin, zircon, zinc and strangle titanium.
But anyway I think these tests are ongoing. But I think its one way to determine the authenticity of the ancient vases. Like an identity marker.
Has anyone identified a signature of 20th century lathes?
Of course, thats what all the language that is being used. Not actually saying its a specific lathe or period of modern times. But that some sort of fixed lathing was involved. Thats all that is necessary as there was no fixed lathe cutter during that time. Not even a simple potters wheel.
If there was it would have been very rudimentary and certainly not as sophisticated. In fact this was also not the case later such as with the Bore Stick commonly used in later dynasties. As this is unstable and leaves completely different signatures.
One final note directly to you Steve:
Your sources are not doing you any favors. They say incredibly dumb and implausible things and present it as "science".
Thats according to you. For example you label Dr Max's hypothesis as whacko. You don't know and he has based this on his expert understanding. I would say on this he is more knowledgable than you.
How do we know you are just being hyper skeptical and don't like alternative ideas. Yet it was alternative ideas that moved science forward. All I have presented has good research and testing. I have specific what is spectulation. Your making this into a conspiracy not me.
Do you think all the talk about UAP's and advanced tech is all whacko.
There are so many con artists and grifters in "precision vase" space that it is hard to find a serious investigator. Given the higher quality of his write-up, I has some hope that "Dr. Max" might be more serious, but he is clearly not.
Once again I disagree. You seem to hold a low opinion of anyone who presents something alernative. Dr Max even mentions this and this seems to be from a man who is honest and knows what he is talking about.
Dr Max
Being wrong is normal. Wrong should not be stigmatized. Only by admitting wrong can we learn and improve. In fact, when we are learning, we are wrong most of the time. If one equates science with learning, then science and scientists are wrong most of the time. There are countless examples of it in physics and medicine.
I posted the "ancient aliens" meme in hope to shock you into realization that you are being taken for a ride by nonsense peddlers. It is the same reason I mentioned "Atlantis" early in the thread. The sources you cite are being influenced by the "Hancock/Ancient Aliens/Atlantis/Connolly" tree of bad ideas. Dunn and "UnchartedX" are clearly Hancock superfans as is the "Ancient History BA" who made the video in your OP.
I think this is arrogance. That you think others are incapable of knowing this and can still support alternative ideas. That if they do they must be whackos. I also think its decieving that you equate the two for just about everything that does not align with your preconcieved ideas and beliefs.
Dr Max specifically said this was a hypothesis and nothing actually real or factual. Heexplained his reasoning based on scientific possibilities and not some far fetched idea about gods or the supernatural. Yet you specifically ignored this and pretended that he was actually proposing this as fact. Thus the decption to painted good people as whacko.
There are many good people out there supporting such ideas. This whole thread has been one big conspiriacy itself lol. A conspiriact to make out good people and alternative ideas are a conspiracy lol.
I completely understand your point. You seem to think people don;t know this.
Its the same attitude that Christians must be nieve and easily fooled for believing in God.
You deny that you favor "ancient aliens" or "Atlantis" and I accept the truthfulness of that claim, as I suspect the other posters on the thread generally do as well. My only effort here is to try to get you to realize that this is not the case with many of the sources you rely on with the hope that you will reassess their general credibility.
Ancient alians. I never even alluded to such things and I can see this preconcieved assumption is ooozing out of you with every reply. It is you who are building in your own mind the strawman of ancient aliens and Atlantis because some people dare to propose alternative knowledge.
Don't even use the word (advanced) then but (alternative) because advanced only makes sense in light of our own advancement as we understand today with the tech we have. Call it alternative. That some ancients knew how to mess with nature and discovered some alternative knowledge about nature and reality.
Nothing to do with Atlantis or aliens. Just humans and nature. Nature is an amazing thing and is certainly capable of doing things we consider impossible. It is nature we are tapping into today to improve tech.
While we are on aliens and this is in no way bringing aliens in as far as ancient tech. But what do you think today of the UAP's and advanced tech that even congress seems to be saying. Here we have modern day people, high ranking good people under oath and certainly not whackos saying theres advanced tech we cannot understand.