• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Ezra Klein: Charlie Kirk was practicing politics the right way

Attempting to accelerate change by leveraging the old Comenius philosophy of "allow me to teach a child until they're 7, and I will show you the man" has not been well-received.

That's where I see a major distinction between the earlier forms of gay advocacy vs. the modern forms of LGBTQ activism.
People don't accept concepts like gay marriage because of any activism. They accept it because they were told by some that it meant the end of western civilisation! That the sky was going to fall! That society would crumble! And then...it didn't.

People thought 'Hey, life just goes as it always did. So Dave in accounts got married to Pete and...nothing changed. Everything is just the same. We were lied to'.
Upvote 0

Israel is losing Americans (support)

It’s not about illegitimacy of the Hama’s power. If the Gaza is handed back to Hamas, they will continue to brutally oppress its own citizens, kill those who disagree with them, take their food and enrich themselves, buy rocket and offensive weapon with the aid money given for food.

Is that ok with you ?
That seems a stupid plan, but you never know with Trump. If he thought it would help him to the Peace Prize he would do it in a New York minute. But that would be for afters. Right now the fighting has to stop and in order to do that you have to deal with the people who are actually doing the fighting. Trying to find a more sympathetic leader who might go on be elected in hypothetical elections some time after the fighting has stopped begins to sound like an excuse to keep fighting. What authority would he have to have to order HAMAS to stop fighting? Why should HAMAS obey him?
Upvote 0

Israel and the New Covenant.

The 4th commandment is not part of the noachide law so the argument is mute. In addition Romans 5:13-14 already tells us that there was no law until Moses.
Yes there was.
Gen 26:4 And I will make thy seed to multiply as the stars of heaven, and will give unto thy seed all these countries; and in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed;
5 Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws.
This was not law that imputed sin

Ro 5:13 (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.

Law Abraham kept..... Imputed righteousness
Ro 3:27 Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith.
Ro 4:11 And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised: that he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not circumcised; that righteousness might be imputed unto them also:
Ro 4:22 And therefore it was imputed to him for righteousness.
Not written for Abraham alone but also us.....

Ro 4:23 Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was imputed to him;
Ro 4:24 But for us also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead;
Upvote 0

Israel and the New Covenant.

Does God have to repeat Himself for one to obey Him?

Look, I can see all other 9 commandment explicitely and implicitly being given to the Christian in the new covenant. There is no explicit or implicit verse in the NT commanding the Christian to keep the 4th commandment. Christ totally fulfilled it.
Do you apply this same standard to everyone of the Ten Commandments or just the Sabbath? If not repeated during a certain timeframe, it disappeared. It’s a weird standard, not one found in Scriptures. Jesus in His own words said it started at creation as it was made for man Mark 2:27 when was man made? The sixth day of Creation. Gen 1:26 In the image of God. Jesus in His own words said the Sabbath would be kept by His faithful at least 40 years after the Cross Mat 24:20 so not something ratified at the cross as many teach. The Lord says the Sabbath continues in the New Heaven and New Earth Isa 66:23. I think He would know more than us.
Matt. 24:20 says no such thing not even close.
  • Agree
Reactions: Clare73
Upvote 0

Illegal Immigration

Those studies are flawed. They only deal with illegals that have been caught and proven to be illegal. Texas doesn't know they are illegal when caught. There is controversy surrounding the study and this is only in one state. A controversial study in one state. Not reliable.
But out of the violent crime that is recorded, the statistics represented show how much lower undocumented immigrants are than documented, let alone American born citizens.

If - as you suggest, there are far more undocumented immigrants in the State / country than have appeared before law enforcement as a result of crime - then that means as a percentage of the whole there is even LESS crime amongst undocumented immigrants than the study shows!

It's just how mathematics works.

(When you do magic hand waving, try to remember which hand holds the secret or you'll give the trick away.)

The fact is the vast majority are NOT granted asylum. They don't meet the criteria.
Remember my request for evidence?

Remember, we don't have a national religion. If we are goingvto say that we need to follow the OT then should we follow the OT on all things or just the things you want?
I'm talking about how you feel, and how you write.
What would you want the country to do?
Why do you vote the way you do?
Also - we're Christians - so of course we see the OT through the gospel lens of the NT in how the OT concepts of prophet, priest, and king are all transformed through Jesus - and with them our relationship between God's people (the church) and the relevant authorities of the day (the state).

But I still maintain that justifying Trump's dog-whistling to Proud Boys and their friends is difficult for a Christian - because while we are not under the theocratic rule of the OT - we are under its moral obligations.

Love your neighbour.
Who is my neighbour?
That group outside your borders that you do not like - but who seem to care for each other.

To the Jews that was the Samaritans (with their 'poisoned blood' from generations of marrying Assyrians). To Americans it could very well be the kind hearted immigrant family who DID in fact just flee their country because of the drug gangs extortion demands now moving to stealing their teenage daughters.

We have laws on the books and we should follow them.
Yes you should! Both conscience and law require that you apply the international convention of human rights and well being of refugees diligently and carefully.
Yeah I dont do that anymore. I look the stuff up and just say what I've found. I have yet to find anyone who just either disregarded my links or just refused to believe them. So there isnt any point.
Maybe for hardened people who are just not open to data. But your critiques of the Texas study I referenced - let alone the other 3 - have been laughable. You've unwittingly suggested that the undocumented immigrant is even MORE law abiding and careful than the studies show!

So - in other words - you sound exactly like the people you are critiquing who refuse to listen to data. They have their 'truth' in a very postmodern sense - and don't want any unnecessary 'inconvenient truths' mucking up their tidy little universe!

I - on the other hand - respect data.
I know internet debates can change minds.
Why? Because my own has been changed on many things.
I have had to shift the whole tone of my blog repeatedly!

EG: I'm a climate activist. My writing 21 years ago was anti-nuclear. Then for about 15 years I became pro-nuclear - because I was convinced by the studies back then that there was no WAY we could afford to Overbuild renewables enough to compensate for the intermittency - they were just too expensive to build multiples of our grid capacity! But now they are so cheap - and solar is still likely to halve again by 2030 - we CAN Overbuild wind and solar, and still have spare change for all the pumped hydro dams we could want to back it up. (These can be off-river, only pumping in a little water every few months to compensate for evaporation.)

I had to eat humble pie when I finally admitted that the costings were in, and renewables could do the job. That was only about 2.5 years ago.

I had to rewrite huge chunks of my blog in my spare time!

Those who respect reality LET their minds be changed by data!
I've also discovered that far too many so called studies are too unreliable to be depended on as accurate.... They aren't magic hand waving. See above.
The above was a fantastic illustration of magic-hand waving going wrong and giving up the trick.
  • Like
Reactions: Niels
Upvote 0

Can we talk about ADHD... and such ?

Yes

Yes, and while I do not believe that instant miraculous cures for everything would be the standard, nor should they necessarily be, but oh yes, if people understood that Jesus' loves us and awareness of that could solve so, so much. No pill can fix an error understanding the Lord, and most mental health help is not even trying to resolve matters of understanding Jesus, His love is not archaic, it is eternal.


No you are not. I am looking for people to share this stuff with face to face in real life. Please feel free to be praying for me.


Please note - to all who have mental health problems - do not suddenly stop taking your medication, if you wish to cease taking it, get proffessional help, I believe your suffering is real, and I do not mean that you just lack faith. Whatever you are living with or in, Jesus cares.

I am a survivor of ECT radically returned to faith and healed over a seven year period (that was 50 years ago, no medication, no relapse) - I would be happy to have a video call with you if that would help.
  • Love
Reactions: RamiC
Upvote 0

The Schumer Shutdown

UK has an income tax rate of 40% if you make more than 52k

France has an income tax rate of 30%

Sweden has an income tax rate of 52%

If you truly believe the taxpayer is not paying for healthcare, you are greatly deceived

30-50% of your income for life.
An F-35 costs somewhere around $110M (or 30 top-of-the-line MRI machines); fortunately due to tax-cuts, future generations will be paying.
Upvote 0

Israel and the New Covenant.

The council decided that Gentiles were to keep the law concerning gentiles as taught in the synagogue from old time. Any Gentile could go into any synagogue today and find out what that is. Noachide law. Abraham was considered a Noachide the first 75 years of his life, until he was called to become a father to the jews (circumcision). I just read this on aish, this morning
The 4th commandment is not part of the noachide law so the argument is mute. In addition Romans 5:13-14 already tells us that there was no law until Moses.
  • Agree
Reactions: Clare73
Upvote 0

Trump Calls For Ilhan Omar’s Removal From Congress

Stop trying to deflect...it IS true, as you yourself admitted. Stop trying to define the terms of it. It is historically true in a historical context.

Alright, then let's continue to be true.

The current Republican Party is the party of Neo-Nazis and KKK.

Can we agree on that? And we know this is the case, because:

1) Which party do Neo-Nazis and the KKK support?
2) Which party is opposed to removing monuments that glorify traitors who fought to defend the institution of slavery?
3) Which party is the one that actively tries to ban books, opposes Equal Rights and Civil Rights policies?

It's not the Democrats. It's the Republicans.

-CryptoLutheran
Upvote 0

Israel and the New Covenant.

Still no evidence that the law was given before Moses and still no scripture that the 4th commandment is commanded post crucifixion to the Christian. However, Jesus did say that He was taking over the 4th commandment and the rest of the law. You would think that if it was that important it would be all over the place but is not.
The council decided that Gentiles were to keep the law concerning gentiles as taught in the synagogue from old time. Any Gentile could go into any synagogue today and find out what that is. Noachide law. Abraham was considered a Noachide the first 75 years of his life, until he was called to become a father to the jews (circumcision). I just read this on aish, this morning
Upvote 0

The Schumer Shutdown

UK has an income tax rate of 40% if you make more than 52k

France has an income tax rate of 30%

Sweden has an income tax rate of 52%

If you truly believe the taxpayer is not paying for healthcare, you are greatly deceived

30-50% of your income for life.
All for health care?
Upvote 0

Israel and the New Covenant.

Still no Scripture about Jesus saying He changed His Sabbath. I know because it’s not there, it would make God break His promise Psa 89:34 Mat 5:18-19 which He doesn’t.

I am going to move on, i think we have exhausted this. I am okay agreeing to disagree. God will sort this out in His own time.

I wish you well.
Still no evidence that the law was given before Moses and still no scripture that the 4th commandment is commanded post crucifixion to the Christian. However, Jesus did say that He was taking over the 4th commandment and the rest of the law. You would think that if it was that important it would be all over the place but is not.
  • Like
Reactions: Clare73
Upvote 0

Ezra Klein: Charlie Kirk was practicing politics the right way

Thanks for proving my point. It's very similar to saying, "Kirk was Hitler, and that's why he had to die."
Saying that Kirk was on the far right is very similar to saying that he had to die? That's not even in the same neighbourhood as a reasonable statement.
Perhaps he would have to die if he were Hitler, but the claim that Kirk was Hitler is just a lie.
Well, yeah. He was simply someone on the right who had worked out how to make a living from it by pretending to debate with students.
Upvote 0

Charlie Kirk's Opinions Didn't Deserve Him Being Murdered

I appreciate that you have heard little. Certainly he didn’t say word for a word everything that Jesus said that we have recorded in Scripture. Yes he did preach many of the same things Jesus taught, and said. There are plenty of sound bites, too many in fact. we could flood this thread with them, it would just be a slightly time-consuming task to find each video, and posting the link. but we don’t want the sound bites really, what we want is what was said in context. The people who have decided to treat him as an enemy have shown again and again that that they truly did not listen to him. At most, he said a couple of things that they strongly disagree with.
Thanks for trying to respond to my question. Though I am genuinely curious to hear just one of the teachings of Jesus that Charlie Kirk also preached. So far, I haven't found any.
  • Like
Reactions: rusmeister
Upvote 0

Living by faith, not by sight

We tithe, and wonder to make it every month. I don’t know what we’d do without money coming in. We pray,
we go to church twice a week. We serve. We don’t love our money but it’s survival. Month to month, not complaining.

God has provided for us. But never pray so we can eat every day. Paul fasted a lot, he was a long way from a clothing ministry at times. Having no Money facilitated his ministry, his witness, his writing. He went without between cities. We live by faith for joy and peace and endurance. We live by faith for life every day. We don’t have to worry about food but to stay in Christ in faith in love. God has provided and does provide everything we need.

But are you guys working? Or free as bird with a fiddle? That would definitely be by faith. Traveling?
Out of curiosity, have you ever heard tithing mentioned in the New Testament

Jesus taught that we can't serve God and money, that we'd love one or the other. (Matthew 6:24) The more we profess a need for money, the more we communicate that IT is the source of our provision, and not the God who owns the cattle on the hills.

To answer your question, yes, my wife and I work. But we work for (i.e. serve) God, and not money. Sometimes our work brings in "income"; sometimes it doesn't. But because serving God (and not money) is our motivation, we are just as happy to do our work when we are being paid for it, as when we are not.

How about you? Would you still do your job if you weren't being paid to do it?
Upvote 0

Trump Calls For Ilhan Omar’s Removal From Congress

Appropriation does not erase history...what I said was true

It would be historically true to say that in the 1800s the Democratic Party was the party of the KKK.

But that Democratic Party doesn't exist today.

Because historical honesty means we have to talk about the party switch of the mid-20th century. If we don't talk about that, then there is the lie of omission.

Because we don't get the Democratic Party being the party of the KKK to the Democratic Party being the party of Civil Rights without A LOT OF HISTORY HAPPENING INBETWEEN.

Your meme is dishonest because it is ideological partisan propaganda, ommits necessary historical context, and is simply an attempt at poisoning the well.

It's a stupid meme, and it's historically dishonest. And either you know that and you don't care, or you don't know this, and you should read a history book.

-CryptoLutheran
Upvote 0

Ezra Klein: Charlie Kirk was practicing politics the right way

Question: What happens when enough people claim that some person is a fascist Hitlerian threat (because their subculture deems that sort of claim appropriate) even though within the broader culture the person is well within the pale of common opinion?

Answer: Charlie Kirk ends up with a bullet in his neck that is engraved with sayings such as, "Hey fascist! Catch!"
Considering the number of times Trump and his people called Harris and Democrats in general fascists, Marxists, enemies of the people, and evil over the course of the past year and a half, that doesn't track. Most Americans hadn't even heard of Charlie Kirk before his assassination, let alone that people were calling him a fascist.
Upvote 0

A perspective on Baptism and the plan of salvation that I have not heard before

"Mary is the perfect one, the only one of her mother." NOT TRUE according to scripture.

  • Romans 3:23: "for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God".
  • Romans 3:10: "None is righteous, no, not one".
  • Ecclesiastes 7:20: "Indeed, there is no one on earth who is righteous, no one who does what is right and never sins".
  • 1 John 1:8: "If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us".

Firstly, Ecclesiastes was obviously written before the birth of the Theotokos, and Romans and 1 John post-date her demise. We can say this because the Holy Apostles were still alive at the time of her repose. Secondly, these scriptures were written for our benefit - indeed it is unlikely Our Lady ever heard Romans or 1 John per se.

However, just because the Theotokos did not commit forensic sin does not mean she saved herself. Rather she was saved, like the rest of us, through Christ our True God, whose incarnation happened in her womb.

Scripture does clearly assert the Theotokos to be blessed and that all generations shall regard her as blessed.

*Of course, she knew the Holy Apostles, and was particularly well acquainted with St. Luke, who was her physician, and St. John the Beloved Disciple by virtue of having adopted him at the command of her Son from the Cross) although she was no doubt familiar with their message. Ecclesiastes however she was likely well aware of given the nature of her youth. Actually for that matter, most first century Christians would not have heard both Romans and John, since we are talking about epistles written by St. Paul and St. John to specific local ekkelsia, which were only later identified as genuine apostolic writings and included in the New Testament Canon as it was formalized in 367 AD by St. Athanasius based on earlier proposed canons (such as that in the Ecclesiastical History of Eusebius, that of the Syriac Peshitta**, a minimalist 22 book canon that lacks 2 John, 3 John, 2 Peter, Jude and Revelation) and that of the ancient manuscripts like the Codex Sinaiticus which included a few extra books later reckoned spurious if not heretical, like Laodiceans, most likely for fear of omissions (indeed St. Jerome translated this into Latin for the Vulgate despite regarding it as an apocryphon) as well as early Patristic writings such as the Shepherd of Hermas.

** The extra five books of the New Testament canon were later added to the West Syriac Peshitto used by the Syriac Orthodox Church and historically by the Maronite Christians of Lebanon (among whom it survives as a liturgical language, but sadly the Maronites on;y speak Arabic in the vernacular, whereas some West Syriac Christians from Syria, Turkey and the Holy Land, and nearly a million East Syriac / Assyrian Christians in Iraq and Iran, do continue to speak various Aramaic dialects which are related to Syriac, which in turn was historically the predominant form of Aramaic used by Christians. Indeed Christian, Jewish and Mandaean speakers of Aramaic developed their own divergent dialects; the Mandaeans speak Mandaic for instance, although anyone raised speaking Aramaic who later studies the language in depth can with some effort understand these various dialects. However they are quite distinct from Old Testament Aramaic or Gallilean Neo-Aramaic, the dialect likely spoken by Christ our True God, separated by time and geography.

In English, unlike in German, we don’t have many surviving dialects which have intelligibility problems, but there are a few used in parts of England which are very hard to understand, but which usually also exist in a mitigated accent form, for example, Geordie, the dialect spoken in North Yorkshire and Lancashire, or Scots. However we can get a sense of how intelligibility decreases over time by trying to read Middle English (I can read Geoffrey Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales per aspera, but the more removed we get from Modern English the more opaque it becomes, and Old English is unintelligible to me, except with a few recognizable words. Additionally, the West Frisian language, spoken in a province of the Netherlands, is also almost mutually intelligible with English and Scots, hence the saying “Eggs and green cheese is good English and good Fries.”
Upvote 0

There’s a Giant Flaw in Human History

@stevevw, it's provenance not providence. Despite being implicitly corrected on this by one or more posters, you have persisted in the error. It's further evidence that you do not read, or rarely understand the multiple refutations your posts have received. Detail seems to go over your head. The only providence related to this thread is its total absence in warning me how much ill argued material you would present.
Upvote 0

Newsome pushed back against Democracy to achieve his political goals

In 2024 Newsom and Bass made cuts to firefighting budgets while Newsom authorized almost 10 billion for healthcare for illegal immigrants. It’s all on your keyboard my friend.
As others have said - please concede the truth about Trump's water lies - and then you will have some street kudos back. We can move onto other claims after we've dealt with this slippery, watery claim from a slippery President.
  • Wow
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,876,475
Messages
65,383,729
Members
276,277
Latest member
Baron de Rais