• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Illinois Gov. Pritzker Says Chicago Is Safe As 35 Shot, 5 Dead Labor Day Weekend

Again, I agree. Send them to BLUE cities.
Girl, you just told on yourself.

By wanting them sent to blue cities, you reveal that:

1. You don’t want this action taken in areas with citizens you agree with

2. The overall deployment of government against its own people on its own land is undesirable and thus you don’t want it for you

3. There is an intimidation factor in deployment and you want it used on the people you don’t agree with

4. If suppression is a byproduct of what’s occurring, you’re fine with it occurring against the people you don’t agree with but don’t want it in cities with people who support your agenda

I’m not shocked that the person who doesn’t think women should be allowed to vote thinks all this, mind you. I’m just amused that you really have zero ethical or moral issue with admitting the vision you want in America is not that of a democracy and that you’re willing to deploy Herod-like tactics to ensure it.
Upvote 0

Hamas knows exactly what it is doing. Starvation is a bargaining chip; the emaciated hostage is a living press release.


A quick perusal indicates that this institute is made up predominately, if not entirely, by a single demographic. That doesn't make the paper wrong, of course, just suspicious as to its bias.
If you can beat it then just throw mud at the wall and see what sticks.
Upvote 0

Hamas knows exactly what it is doing. Starvation is a bargaining chip; the emaciated hostage is a living press release.

That’s not what the paper I cited concluded. Please read the paper and respond accordingly.

A quick perusal indicates that this institute is made up predominately, if not entirely, by a single demographic. That doesn't make the paper wrong, of course, just suspicious as to its bias.
Upvote 0

Jesus & Social Justice

I see that you want to stay away from the Marxist-sounding word "redistribution," but in fact that's a correct word to use for what happens to the land on the Day of Jubilee. You just don't like the word.
Is not that I don’t like the word is just that the word does not exist.
But if we get down to it, there is another resource redistribution also spoken of in the Old Testament that Paul explicitly maps to the way the Body of Christ should manage resources within the Body of Christ. That's in 2 Corinthians 8, which maps the intended resource management of the Church back to Exodus 16:18.

  • In Exodus 16:16, God gives the instruction:

Each person was supposed to end up with one omer (a standard measure) of manna per day.

  • Some gathered more than an omer, some less—probably due to differences in strength, diligence, or ability.
  • But when it was measured, every household ended up with exactly one omer per person.
The result:
  • No hoarding, no shortage.
  • God’s provision was sufficient for all, and it became a lesson in dependence and fairness, rather than competition or greed.
The Israelites gathered unequally, but the manna was redistributed (by God’s ordering of events) so that each person had the commanded amount—an omer per head.

Paul’s brilliance in 2 Corinthians 8 is that he lifts this same principle into the realm of Christian giving within the Body of Christ: a Spirit-led sharing that ensures no one is left in lack.
The churches still collect from members and people to give to the poor. In fact some of the largest charities are from churches. During Exodus our perfect God was in charge and even then the people were not satisfied (they wanted meat rather than mana).

The problem now is that, as one time charity was strictly by churches, now the government has taken over that role and it has become highly political. It does not work. I’m sure that, once Christ takes over the government of the world, His socialism will be perfect. So your post, as utopian as it sounds, will never come to fruition merely because of human nature.
Upvote 0

Trump’s Domestic Use of Military Set to Get Worse, Leaked DHS/DoD Memo Shows: LA "hasn't been perfect" but indicates what's coming "for years to come"

Judge rules Trump illegally deployed National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles

"In short, Defendants violated the Posse Comitatus Act," he said.

Lawyers representing California argued during a three-day trial last month that President Donald Trump had exceeded his authority by deploying federal troops after thousands of protesters took to the streets of downtown L.A. to protest his immigration policies.

California had asked Breyer to order the Trump administration to return control of the remaining troops to Gov. Gavin Newsom and to stop using the military “to execute or assist in the execution of federal law.”

“There were indeed protests in Los Angeles, and some individuals engaged in violence,” he wrote. “Yet there was no rebellion, nor was civilian law enforcement unable to respond to the protests and enforce the law.”

Breyer ordered the Trump administration to stop using military troops in California “to execute the laws, including but not limited to engaging in arrests, apprehensions, searches, seizures, security patrols, traffic control, crowd control, riot control, evidence collection, interrogation, or acting as informants” unless the situation meets the bar for invoking the Posse Comitatus Act.

“What limiting factors are there, to the use of this force?” Breyer asked. “Why is the federalized National Guard, even though it’s been drawn down, still in place?”
Upvote 0

Illinois Gov. Pritzker Says Chicago Is Safe As 35 Shot, 5 Dead Labor Day Weekend

Criminals don't care about gun control. That's why, they are CRIMINALS.

If anything, we have a mental health problem.

Our nation needs to address that.

Saying that as a person who doesn't own guns, nor will ever use one.

(for personal reasons)

My opinion only.
They don’t care about gun control, no, but it certainly makes the criminals easier to identify and arrest.
Upvote 0

Under RFK Jr.'s Leadership, CDC Launches Large Wasteful Study on Vaccines and Autism

RFK Jr. Says CDC Needs to More Closely Align With Trump’s Agenda


(Bloomberg) -- US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention isn’t sufficiently aligned with President Donald Trump’s agenda and it needs an overhaul, a day after the White House fired the director following an intense clash over vaccines.​
There you go. The health of America needs to follow a political agenda and not actual science.
The health america hasn't followed "actual science" in a long time. Instead, it followed profit.

Not that I'd expect that to change.
Upvote 0

Illinois Gov. Pritzker Says Chicago Is Safe As 35 Shot, 5 Dead Labor Day Weekend

What laws do you propose and why the states accused of being the source/cause of these gun crimes not experiencing similar gun crime issues? The short answer is that the problem is not the gun laws, but a culture that promotes gun violence.
By not wanting to refine gun laws, you’re not super concerned about lowering gun violence, which means it must not be that big a problem, which means the federal government doesn’t need to invade Chicago.

Problem solved.
Upvote 0

Hamas knows exactly what it is doing. Starvation is a bargaining chip; the emaciated hostage is a living press release.

Looks like this guy just joined to bash Israel. Make me wonder what his actual motivation is.
Opposition to genocide and to Zionist propaganda, from what I see. Also a concern for Christians living in the area.
Upvote 0

What do you think of this lengthy FB post I found?

I was watching a video of one of those so-called Christian bands at an award show. They kept chanting the name of Jesus over and over, singing about how amazing He was, lifting Him up, making it sound like it was all for Him. But as they did, they were gyrating and swirling across the stage, dressed in tight leather, moving like the world, looking like the world, embracing everything the world celebrates. And in that moment, the Spirit of God gripped me and said, “That’s what it means to take My name in vain.”

Not just a cuss word. But a life, a stage, a song that pretends to honor Jesus while living in open rebellion against Him.

And it’s not just the music. It’s the whole machine. A celebrity worship culture where people build careers on Jesus’ name but refuse to carry His cross. A false apostolic and prophetic movement where men and women chase platforms, money and applause more than they chase the presence of God.

They wear the cross around their neck while refusing to carry it on their back. They sing about Jesus while living for self. They say, “Look what God is doing,” but the only thing growing is their bank balance and their brand.

This is not anointing. This is the golden calf remade for the modern Church, and the name of Jesus is being used to build it.

And we cheer. We clap. We go gaga. We cry when the music swells and say, “Isn’t God good?” And we don’t even realize the whole thing reeks of flesh and self and showmanship.

You might be nodding in agreement about now, saying, “Yes. Lord, expose it.”

And then I remember when Paul Washer made a statement at a famous youth meeting that cut to the heart. The room clapped in agreement. And he stopped and said, “Why are you clapping? I’m talking about you.”

And that’s where this needs to go. It’s not enough to just talk about the platform. We need to take this to the pew as well.

Most of us grew up being told, “Don’t ever say ‘Oh my God.’ Don’t use the Lord’s name carelessly. Don’t cuss like that.” So we learned how to watch our mouth, how to say the right thing, how to be well-behaved Christians who don’t swear. And we thought that was holiness. We thought that was reverence.

But no one told us that you can say all the right things and still take His name in vain. No one told us that you can whisper “Jesus” through tears while living in disobedience and still be in danger of judgment. No one told us that you can sing the worship song and raise your hands and never once give Him your heart. We taught people how to be clean on the outside, how to speak carefully, but not how to die daily. And in doing so, we taught people how to appear holy while their affections were far from God.

We’ve raised up a generation who think sincerity is surrender, singing “I surrender all” while holding back part of their heart.

We can quote the words of Christ but ignore the weight of them.

“If anyone wants to come after Me, he must deny himself, take up his cross daily, and follow Me.” (Luke 9:23)

Daily. Not occasionally. Not symbolically. He said if we do not take up our cross daily, we are not worthy of Him.

Do we understand that?

If you are not dying daily, you are not walking with Him. You’re using His name while following a version of Him that doesn’t require surrender. And that is what it means to take His name in vain.

It goes deeper than what comes out of your mouth. It’s the condition of your heart. When you say, “Jesus is Lord,” but refuse to obey Him, you are a liar. When you sing, “You’re all I want,” but chase the approval of man, you are a hypocrite. When you shout, “Have Your way in me,” but guard your pet sins, you are mocking Him with your worship.

This is what He meant when He said: “These people honor Me with their lips, but their hearts are far from Me.” “In vain do they worship Me.” (Matthew 15:8–9)

In vain. Their worship means nothing. It is noise. It is a clanging cymbal. And many of us are guilty. Not just the stage performers. Not just the celebrity worship teams. Us. In the pews. In the prayer meetings. In the mirror.

I know what I’m talking about because I lived it. Twelve years of willful sin, pretending I was just “falling.” Confessing over and over again, convincing myself I was repentant when I wasn’t. Quoting Scriptures about the righteous man falling seven times, while I loved my sin and refused to crucify it.

I was a hypocrite. I wore the name of Jesus and lived like I didn’t know Him. I was acting. That’s what hypocrite means.

And Jesus said of people like that: “They have soiled their garments, and they will not walk with Me in white.” (Revelation 3:1–6)

And shockingly He warned they were in danger of having their names removed from the Book of Life.

Some think feeling bad or confessing often is the same as repenting. But the Bible says the only ones who are truly His are those who put to death the deeds of the flesh by the Spirit. (Romans 8:13)

But it’s not just the obvious sins of the flesh. We are to cleanse ourselves from all defilement of the flesh AND spirit. (2 Corinthians 7:1) Sins of the spirit, pride, jealousy, bitterness, self-righteousness. These too defile. These too stain our garments. These too take His name in vain when we sing about loving Him and living for Him, but walk in a spirit that doesn’t reflect Him at all.

You can be admired, anointed, and applauded, and still not be abiding. To remain in Him, you must keep dying to everything that pulls you away. To truly worship Him is to say, from the gut, “Not my will, but Yours be done,” and mean it.

So yes, we better check our own hearts while we point the finger. Because if we lift His name with our lips and refuse to lay down our lives, if we sing about the cross but refuse to carry it, if we shout His praises while walking in rebellion…

Then we too have taken His name in vain.

And He will not hold us guiltless.

--Mark McCourt
Yep. Some services are entertainment and glorification of man, not worship of God.
Upvote 0

A conversation about unity.

The thing with the doctrines of the Incarnation and the Trinity, is they have very strong and extensive scriptural backing. Which is why practically all of Christianity is in agreement with them.

True. Still, the full development of the doctrines, in terms of natures and essences and persons and so on, took a few centuries. In particular, there are some fine points that the early theologians realized that I wouldn't have seen without their help, if I'd had to sit alone with a Bible and figure out the doctrine of the Incarnation by myself.
  • Agree
Reactions: The Liturgist
Upvote 0

Is This The New Normal?

This is the reason the leftists say crime is down. Because they have redefined words to suit their agenda.
I used the pretty standard definitions, actually. Perhaps give a gander to that little thing called the Constitution? Start with the Fifth Amendment then take a field trip over to the Fourteenth Amendment (I believe).

If that’s too much of a commitment, maybe just watch the opening spiel of “Law and Order” or the closing announcement of any “Cops” episode.
Upvote 0

A conversation about unity.

Does the Lutheran and Catholic church teach every single thing about Mary the Roman Catholic Church teaches? Because that's what I mean by Mariology. The entire RCC teaching about Mary.

Many high church Anglicans exactly follow Roman mariology, as opposed to the slightly different approach of the Eastern Orthodox (who regard the Blessed Virgin Mary as immaculate but do not agree with the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception, in part because of the difference it creates between the Theotokos and ourselves and also because using the anti-Pelagian understanding of original sin taught by St. John Cassian rather than that taught by his fellow Latin ascetic St. Augustine of Hippo, who we do nonetheless venerate and greatly love*, it is not required). St. Magnus the Martyr and All Saints Margaret Street (the former celebrates the Mass partially in Latin, the latter uses the formal liturgy from the Book of Common Prayer but has a service every Saturday dedicated to Our Lady of Walsingham.

*Opinions to the contrary from schismatic Old Calendarists not withstanding. The schismatic Old Calendarists and schismatic Old Believers are to the Orthodox like Sedevacantists are to the Roman church - radicals engendered by ill advised liturgical changes. Fortunately in the case of the calendar change it was not implemented church-wide, although unfortunately some Russians in the US were lured into the schismatic Genuine Orthodox Church by people who falsely claimed that ROCOR was turning into a bastion of ecumenism upon the occasion of its restoration of communion with the other canonical Orthodox churches in 2007, and these schismatics managed to seize control of a ROCOR parish in Southern California, and operated it as a trap to lure people thinking it was ROCOR. I would also note these schisms are as close as Orthodoxy has ever come to a Reformation, because the reforming tendency in Orthodoxy always operates in the direction of tradition, and in a sense this was also true of Lutheranism - Martin Luther, like St. Jan Hus and St. Jerome of Prague (who are venerated as martyrs by the Czech and Slovak Orthodox Church) sought to restore practices which had fallen out of routine use in the Western church, such as communion in both kinds, while retaining the mass, icons, devotion to the Mother of God, and other essentials - even the Latin mass.

The problem was never Luther, but rather the Radical Reformation and the Restorationists.

Thus unity between the Orthodox and our friends who are Catholics, Lutherans, Anglicans and other traditional Protestants, including traditional Methodists alienated by the UMC and many of the Reformed, is not only possible but probable and to a large extent already happening, but in the case of those who adhere to an aliturgical, anti-sacramental and anti-traditional Christianity, fellowship is possible but not unity, since without a reformation movement to promote infant baptism and the Eucharist in these churches, they simply do not have enough in common with us.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,874,394
Messages
65,349,227
Members
276,154
Latest member
JOY222