A conversation about unity.
- By A New Dawn
- General Theology
- 747 Replies
The discussion is about unity. Protestants aren’t wanted the Catholic communion. Unity revolves around respect for the faith of fellow believers, not wanting what the other has. A show of solidarity with the body of Christ. It’s pretty obvious who is and who is not interested in unity, bit it is one of the things Christ expects of His followers.The Roman Catholics aren’t the ones wanting access to other people’s communion.
Belief in the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church is an article of faith in the Nicene Creed - which does not necessarily mean the Roman Catholic Church, but the idea of the Church Catholic, however you define it: most Evangelicals tend to believe it is an invisible entity of all believers, or consists of the local church. And the New Testament does speak of a single Church - the Body of Christ. Catholic means “according to the Whole”, and thus whoever claims their church is Catholic, whether Protestant, such as Lutherans and Anglicans, or Roman Catholic, or Eastern Orthodox, or Oriental Orthodox, or the Assyrian Church of the East, is actually saying their particular church is a part of the entire church - but they will disagree on what the entire church is, with the definition varying between each of the groups I just mentioned (except for “Branch Ecclesiology” which is known to exist, in several cases without official endorsement, in all of the above, which does not mean it is correct, but it is popular. I am not endorsing it but merely informing about it. But what everyone must acknowledge is the Scriptural reality of one Body of Christ - the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, even if they disagree on its nature, relationship to specific denominations or identity.
As a historical note:
I would say until the 20th century most laity regarded their church as representing the Church Catholic either exclusively or in an idealized state, even if this was not its official doctrine or the view of its founder (for example, Martin Luther defined the Church based on orthopraxis rather than connections to Lutheranism so churches other than Lutherans could be entirely Catholic and Orthodox according to the Lutheran model, but an extreme mistrust of non-Lutheran churches began to appear in the 18th and 19th century likely in reaction to the forced union of Lutheran and Calvinist churches and the Pietist movement, although the most pro-Lutheran book I have simply refers to churches of other beliefs as “Heterodox” leaving open the possibility of an Orthodox church compatible with Lutheranism existing. Since that time, we’ve seen some conservative Anglicans who left the Episcopal church and some conservative Lutherans in a state of full communion, which means more than, for example, the ELCA being in full communion with the UMC or the ECUSA, since the ELCA is part of the Lutheran World Federation which has a great many members which are in direct communion with, or are the result of mergers between, Lutheran and Calvinist churches, and which are what the Lutherans call “crypto-Calvinist.”
Upvote
0