Based on Matthew 10:5-7, and Romans 1:16, and Galatians 1:14-18, the Gospel was taken "first" to the Jews for about 7 years, before Paul took the Gospel to the Gentiles. This was the 70th week of Daniel during the first century.
The only way for you to see the 70th week of Daniel is with a time machine set to return you to the first century.
There is no 7 year tribulation period in the Bible.
It can be created by ignoring the time of the judgment of the dead in Revelation 11:18, or by taking Daniel 9:27 out of its New Covenant context.
.
But that was not the question of rapture being in 1Thessalonians4:13-18 and repeated again in 1Thessalonians5:9-11, which you yourself cited.
Which I had asked you what event triggers the Day of the Lord, to which you seemed to struggle with an answer, so I explained as that event being when the Antichrist goes into the temple, sits, claims to have achieved God-hood in 2Thessalonians2:4.
Bab2, it is not that my explanation was wrong in giving the general timing of the Antichrist's act according to the 70th week, but you have another issue in the view you have of the 70th week being partial fulfilled already.
I have been over it multiple times of why the full 70th week is still ahead of us. The casting down of Satan in Revelation 12:12 as being the third woe to the inhabiters of the earth, leaving Satan with only a time, times, half time, seals the deal that the full seven years are left, with concrete zero percent chance of being wrong. Because it can be backtracked through the verses in Revelation 12, to Revelation 12:6 to correspond to the 1260 days in Revelation 11, and the placement of the 7th angel sounding afterward, announcing the coming of the third woe soon - i.e Satan being cast down, leaving the time, times, half time.
Contrary to my approach being on the concrete information in Revelation 12:12, you are relying on a contrived unrealistic interpretation of what confirming of the covenant is in Daniel 9:27, and a video by Kelly Varner's uneducated awareness of Deuteronomy 31:9-13 of the confirmation of the covenant for 7 years being in the bible as a law established by Moses.
I am not trying to prove or disprove dispensationalism, nor that a pre-trib (pre-70th week) rapture is mandatory. But, imo, it seems that your preoccupation with that cause has taken priority in your state of mind over correctly understanding the bible.
Cloaking your war on dispensationalism and the pre-trib rapture view as New Covenant theology gives a disservice to the legitimate term and meaning of the New Covenant - which is a doctrine not for that purpose.
There is nothing new under the sun, and God has seen it all before. I, therefore, am going to build my house on the concrete foundation of what is in the Word of God, not a video, not a campaign against dispenstationalism, nor a rapture timing view, but on the concrete, zero percent chance of being wrong passages - which two of those are in Revelation 12, the third woe to the inhabiters of the earth, and Ezekiel 39:21-29, God Himself as Jesus speaking in the text - that the full 70th week is still ahead of mankind.