"Only 74" is 74 too many.
Would you say "Only 74" if one of those 74 were your sister or your son or your mother? Those are people-who died from taking something that was suppose to help them.
How do we know how accurate those numbers are if the vaccinated are expected to maintain all the safety protocols? Might that not then be what has saved them or at least bumped up the odds? This seems to be a numbers game.So are the thousands more that would have died without the vaccine.
How do we know how accurate those numbers are if the vaccinated are expected to maintain all the safety protocols? Might that not then be what has saved them or at least bumped up the odds? This seems to be a numbers game.
No, I would consider the suggestion their death was due to the vaccine to be unevidenced nonsense, your repugnant decision to put quotes around "expert" notwithstanding.
....over 3k daily just in the United States.
Yes but how much of that is thanks to restrictions and not the vaccine? It skews the numbers that might otherwise create less of a demand for a very lucrative market.However, look at the drop off in death rates in populations that are heavily vaccinated -- Israel, the UK, 65 and older in the US etc.
Yes but how much of that is thanks to restrictions and not the vaccine? It skews the numbers that might otherwise create less of a demand for a very lucrative market.
Hahaha, this is “news” to you?Now that they're admitting the "vaccines" may only be good for a year and need booster shots, they will have everyone coming back for more.
So apart from the half trillion made this year there could be an annual quarter trillion from now on?Now that they're admitting the "vaccines" may only be good for a year and need booster shots, they will have everyone coming back for more.
Hahaha, this is “news” to you?
So apart from the half trillion made this year there could be an annual quarter trillion from now on?
Those are global numbers. Yours would be about 20 billion this year and 10 thereafter. Still comes out of the taxpayers pocket along with all the stimulus cheques. What happens when the Fed which is a private bank calls in it's debt and sends the repo man for the country. Why maybe they would even make a deal providing constitution and freedoms were cast aside and you became subject to the global government.All funded by Uncle Sam's printing press.
Except in the animal experiments, they did just fine too - for awhile. The trouble came when they were exposed to coronavirus in the wild.
What would qualify as "evidence" to you?
Those are global numbers. Yours would be about 20 billion this year and 10 thereafter. Still comes out of the taxpayers pocket along with all the stimulus cheques. What happens when the Fed which is a private bank calls in it's debt and sends the repo man for the country. Why maybe they would even make a deal providing constitution and freedoms were cast aside and you became subject to the global government.
If the expert in question said there was a link between my loved one's death and the vaccine, your repugnant use of quotes around the word "evidence" notwithstanding.
"Expert in question".
I notice how you don't even bother to qualify who would be considered an expert. Do you simply accept a claim made by someone just because they call themselves an expert?
If one of your loved ones was in perfect health, then got a Covid shot and then died the next day, and then an "expert" told you that there's "no evidence of any connection" between the Covid shot and your loved ones death, would you consider the fact that they died shortly after getting the shot to be "unevidenced nonsense"?
Yours like ours takes it's lead from the WEF. We've been at it a little longer but you'll catch up soon.Seems like that's what our current government is just begging for--or aiming for.