probinson
Legend
- Aug 16, 2005
- 22,326
- 2,955
- 46
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Word of Faith
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
In May 2021, the CDC drafted, but never published, a HAN regarding COVID vaccine induced myocarditis. A recent FOIA request has uncovered emails within the CDC discussing whether this should be published, and suggesting that it should be a HAN. The CDC defines a HAN as "CDC’s primary method of sharing cleared information about urgent public health incidents with public information officers; federal, state, territorial, tribal, and local public health practitioners; clinicians; and public health laboratories."
This demonstrates that the CDC was not only fully aware that COVID vaccine-induced myocarditis was a concern (when they publicly said it wasn't), but they were on the verge of issuing a HAN. However, they chose not to issue the HAN because they didn't want to seem "alarmist", and instead decided just shortly after to mandate the vaccine for the population (males ages 18-34) at highest risk from it. Just a month prior, Dr. Walensky, Director of the CDC said this:
Then less than a month later, they were talking about publishing a HAN for the thing that the CDC Director said they had not seen.
It would be interesting to hear the CDC's defense of this. How did they go from nearly publishing an "urgent" alert about vaccine-induced myocarditis to mandating the vaccine for the population at highest risk of that particular adverse event?
This demonstrates that the CDC was not only fully aware that COVID vaccine-induced myocarditis was a concern (when they publicly said it wasn't), but they were on the verge of issuing a HAN. However, they chose not to issue the HAN because they didn't want to seem "alarmist", and instead decided just shortly after to mandate the vaccine for the population (males ages 18-34) at highest risk from it. Just a month prior, Dr. Walensky, Director of the CDC said this:
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has not found a link between heart inflammation and COVID-19 vaccines, the agency’s Director Rochelle Walensky said on Tuesday.
"We have not seen a signal and we've actually looked intentionally for the signal in the over 200 million doses we've given," Walensky said in a press briefing.
Then less than a month later, they were talking about publishing a HAN for the thing that the CDC Director said they had not seen.
It would be interesting to hear the CDC's defense of this. How did they go from nearly publishing an "urgent" alert about vaccine-induced myocarditis to mandating the vaccine for the population at highest risk of that particular adverse event?
Upvote
0