Since cross-thread quoting people's posts is against the rules, do the following search on Google:Citation needed.
site:christianforums.com "antifa is the moral equivalent of neo-Nazis"
Upvote
0
Since cross-thread quoting people's posts is against the rules, do the following search on Google:Citation needed.
I did, and newsflash... he didn't actually say that! He linked to a news article claiming that, not Rion himself.Since cross-thread quoting people's posts is against the rules, do the following search on Google:
site:christianforums.com "antifa is the moral equivalent of neo-Nazis"
Hahaha, keep twisting and turning, he then goes onto argue with people that say they are not morally equivalent. Keep spinning!I did, and newsflash... he didn't actually say that! He linked to a news article claiming that, not Rion himself.
Because people keep excusing them? Go back and look at my first post: Nazis Return to Charlottesville
I asked if he was using scare quotes in regards to Antifa, which lead to @Ringo84 to go off about how awesome Antifa is. My stance is pretty clear. Yeah, a rabid wolf is dangerous, but don't let an equally rabid lion in your house to protect you from it.
I'll say that personally, I noticed antifa when they "protested" (and I use that word lightly because they supposedly burned cars and smashed windows) Milo at Berkeley. While I've seen various groups of idiotic white supremacists hold rallies my entire life, it was the first time I remember seeing a group actually show up to impede someone's freedom of speech and celebrate for doing so.
I don't like Milo in the least, nor do I agree with the vast majority of what he has to say, but following Berkeley I saw antifa members give interviews where they happily admitted to stopping someone from speaking because they are against "fascism" without even a tiny sense of the irony in that statement. I was appalled that there was a group going around with the intention of denying people their freedom of speech and justifying it by claiming that person was a fascist (though I'm fairly certain Milo isn't a fascist).
I figured that this would be immediately condemned by both the right and left for being the exact kind of tactics that fascists use and completely against our right to freedom of speech...but it wasn't. The right condemned it...the left kind of gave a half hearted "well...they're only just destroying freedom of speech for people we hate" reply.
Frankly, it saddens me to see people on this thread not only not condemn them...but support them. It's a strong reminder of why I can no longer call myself a liberal until that group manages to regain some sense.
"No, he just posts threads claiming antifa and neo-Nazis are morally equivalent."Hahaha, keep twisting and turning, he then goes onto argue with people that say they are not morally equivalent. Keep spinning!
There is nothing untrue about that statement, but it's still besides the point. A thread about neo-Nazis and people are trying to deflect by trying to make the subject about antifa using whataboutism and false moral equivalence."No, he just posts threads claiming antifa and neo-Nazis are morally equivalent."
Keep shifting goal post.
You assert it, but you fail to support it which means I can dismiss it.There is nothing untrue about that statement, but it's still besides the point.
More like "calling out of other people inconstancy and making excuses regarding it antfia"A thread about neo-Nazis and people are trying to deflect by trying to make the subject about antifa using whataboutism and false moral equivalence.
Gee...Nazis were yelling "Jews will not replace us". One ran over Heather Heyer and nineteen others with his car.
But those antifa meanies broke a window in Berkeley
and shouted at Milo! They're obviously exactly the same!
Ringo
Exactly. I just can't understand how you can look at the events of Charlottesville this past August, and your first impulse is deflection by making an issue out of antifa. It says a lot of not-so-good things about American society that we can't even come together to condemn Nazis without whining about the people who oppose them.
Ringo
Do they call for the extermination of all non-whites? Do they plan to implement internment camps for all non-whites? Are they planning to expel from the country all non-whites, regardless if they're legal or illegal? Do they plan on completely disarming the citizenry? I ask these questions because these are the things that come to mind when the term 'Nazi' is used. That's exactly what the Nazis stood for and did.White Nationalists Gather at Emancipation Park
These people have some gall going back there after what happened on August 12th. They need to get out and stay out of Charlottesville. I doubt Nazi nonsense (I'd like to use a stronger word than that, but it's against site rules) is very welcome there, for obvious reasons.
Ringo
Now we're debating about the meaning of the term 'Nazi'? When you use Nazi flags and symbols in your rallies, you...might just be a Nazi. I realize that reality is not all that popular in the Trump era, but there are some things that are hard to deny (if you're debating in good faith, that is).
Ringo
I think good faith debating was gone when you decided to respond to reasoned arguments with memes and links to what I can only assume were pictures.
Now we're debating about the meaning of the term 'Nazi'?
When you use Nazi flags and symbols in your rallies, you...might just be a Nazi.
I realize that reality is not all that popular in the Trump era, but there are some things that are hard to deny (if you're debating in good faith, that is).
Ringo
They were pictures of neo-Nazis with your posts put up beside them to make you appear to be pro-nazi.