Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
In other words, this is 'murica, how dare you infringe on my perceived rights when it comes to a pandemic!
They are not 'perceived'. They are inalienable. As in: "unable to be taken away from or given away by the possessor."
Seems many people do not understand that.
That isn't racist, we've been calling diseases from their orgins for decades. Spanish flu, German measels, West Nile virus, Ebola, Sars etc.
Yes, and the OPer is leading horses to waters as well. You just deem yourself a greater leader than him. And maybe you are....maybe you are not.Then don't believe me. Others will because they will do the research and see that what I am saying is true.
I can only lead a horse to water...
Youre ignoring the studies that show the opposite. In the end the US is on the wrong end of the numbers to be offering any valuable advice. You said your self it's politicised... well doesn't that work both ways?You're ignoring the studies which clearly say cloth masks don't work. It doesn't matter if everyone is wearing a cloth mask, if they don't work then they don't work. The fact that numbers are rising throughout masked Europe suggests that the mask is nothing but a placebo.
Thank you.Nice cherry pick of what I posted!
The notion that science has determined that masks are going to save us from Chinese Coronavirus (or any other disease) is utter tosh. Anyone telling you science is settled on any issue should raise a red flag. On masks, science isn't close to settled.
The British Journal of Medicine says cloth masks are 97% useless. A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers
A study of the more serious 1918 flu pandemic showed masks useless. The American Journal of Public Health (AJPH) from the American Public Health Association (APHA) publications
Another study shows cloth masks useless compared to surgical masks. A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers
Other studies show cloth masks useless compared to surgical masks, even the latter are questionable. They include:
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/bio/23/2/23_61/_pdf/-char/en
Error - Cookies Turned Off
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493952/pdf/annrcse01509-0009.pdf
https://www.journalofhospitalinfection.com/article/0195-6701(91)90148-2/pdf
Simple Respiratory Protection—Evaluation of the Filtration Performance of Cloth Masks and Common Fabric Materials Against 20–1000 nm Size Particles
Masks are associated with oxygen deprivation and increased rates of infection according to these studies:
[Effect of a surgical mask on six minute walking distance] - PubMed
"Exercise with facemask; Are we handling a devil's sword?" - A physiological hypothesis - PubMed
Healthcare personnel exposure in an emergency department during influenza season - PubMed
The physiological impact of wearing an N95 mask during hemodialysis as a precaution against SARS in patients with end-stage renal disease - PubMed
Respiratory consequences of N95-type Mask usage in pregnant healthcare workers-a controlled clinical study - PubMed
A 2015 British study on surgical masks revealed masks don't really protect patient or surgeon very much. And that's in sterile settings. Unmasking the surgeons: the evidence base behind the use of facemasks in surgery
Finally, one New England Journal of Medicine editorial acknowledged the uselessness of masks but demanded universal masking nonetheless less for its placebo effect. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372
There is plenty of evidence out there that masks and mask mandates aren't working and in fact are causing harm. They're a placebo to make you think you're protected and to make politicians look like they're doing something when they're in reality doing nothing.
Do your own research.
What many don't understand is that during a pandemic that same constitution does gives the government the power to enforce things such as masks for the greater good.
The constitution limits the governments power. It does not afford the government powers. It is literally a list of what cannot be taken from the citizenry.
Power enumerated to congress:
- levy and collect taxes,
- coin money and regulate its value,
- provide punishment for counterfeiting,
- establish post offices and roads,
- promote progress of science by issuing patents,
- create federal courts inferior to the Supreme Court,
- combat piracies and felonies,
- declare war,
- raise and support armies,
- provide and maintain a navy,
- make rules for the regulation of land and naval forces,
- exercise exclusive legislation in the District of Columbia,
- make laws necessary to properly execute powers.
Which one are you saying masks fall under?
Which brings up a greater issue. IMO the best way to deal with this disease is to make special accommodations for the vulnerable, to fortify the medical industry's response capability, and to let the disease run its course in the general population, which has high natural immunity to it. Then herd immunity will be built up quickly, and everyone will be the beneficiaries. Some epidemiologists have concluded are that only ~23% of the population has to attain Covid immunity in order to achieve herd immunity.
By making a super big deal of this, we have only empowered it. It feels like a Kafkaesque world when I go out, because 85% of it is pure nonsense. But then Democrats have noticed that Trump's popularity has been inversely proportional to the impact of Covid. Funny how well that comports with the totalitarian, destructive, and nonsensical decrees of many Democratic governors.
Why should 330 million people be forced by the barrel of a government gun to wear a mask that on its best day offers 3% protection?
Let's look at this more broadly. Each year 30-100k Americans die of flu. Should we wear masks on the hope that they might stop 3% of flu cases? According to the CDC's own estimates, Coronavirus has a 99.4-99.85% survival rate. Should all of us be inconvenienced and have our good health put in jeopardy on the outside hope that maybe a couple thousand won't die? That strikes me as completely insane. Especially in light of the dire negative consequences that the governments actions have had on society, from enforced social distancing to economic shutdowns and school closures. The cure is worse than the virus.
They aren't the same thing though which is why surgical masks are marginally better than cloth masks.Yet surgical masks have been preventing doctors and nurses from catching illnesses for several decades (about the 1960s). Long before the corona virus the swine flu or any other epidemic siince the 60s. I wonder why if surgical masks dont work...
Seriously, they work my mother was a nurse for over 40 years. They only will not work if 1 of 3 of the following scenarios happen.
1. The doctor or nurse puts them on wrong or disposes them wrong by touching the front of it and then make contact with their mouth.
2. The mask comes off.
3. They dont wear a mask.
Those are literally the only 3 scenarios where a surgical mask will not work. Theyve been working at preventing medical personel from getting every disease since before you were probably born...(just a guess could be wrong)
I know the general public are making their own cloth masks but they're literally the same thing. They're just cheaper to make.
But according to Lindsay Wiley, the director of the Health Law and Policy Program at American University, there is a legal basis for mandatory masks.
Q&A: Are Face Mask Requirements Legal?
At this point, I really really wish I could leave this country!
That is not what I asked. What constitutional authority does the federal government have to infringe upon the citizenry's rights?
They aren't the same thing though which is why surgical masks are marginally better than cloth masks.
If you read the article, it will give you what you seek.
Bingo. No one wants to confront the elephant in the room. There is not medical consensus on masks, despite what the media and government are peddling. People can't handle knowing that the mask isn't going to save them from Coronavirus.
The constitution limits the governments power. It does not afford the government powers. It is literally a list of what cannot be taken from the citizenry.
Power enumerated to congress:
- levy and collect taxes,
- coin money and regulate its value,
- provide punishment for counterfeiting,
- establish post offices and roads,
- promote progress of science by issuing patents,
- create federal courts inferior to the Supreme Court,
- combat piracies and felonies,
- declare war,
- raise and support armies,
- provide and maintain a navy,
- make rules for the regulation of land and naval forces,
- exercise exclusive legislation in the District of Columbia,
- make laws necessary to properly execute powers.
Which one are you saying masks fall under?
Do you understand the difference between what is legislated, or mandated or even just a policy?
They cannot make wearing a mask in to a law, because that would be legislatively unconstitutional. Thusly, they attempt to enforce an unlegislated non-law, as law, by coercive means. It has no teeth. You cannot be prosecuted for an opinion or non legislated issue. There is no law to be broken, it is therefore unenforceable. Kind of like a 'mandatory' evacuation before a storm. It is not enforceable by law, cannot be legislatively enacted, and is nothing more that a stern warning.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?