That's correct.
the end of the Millennium has literal fire consuming everything, like 2 Peter 3
Okay, so you do see it as literal fire. But, you see it coming down 1000+ years after Christ's return. However, that does not fit the context of what either Paul or Peter said about the day of the Lord.
Let's start with what Paul said about it.
1 Thessalonians 5:1 But of the times and the seasons, brethren, ye have no need that I write unto you.
2 For yourselves know perfectly that
the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night. 3 For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child;
and they shall not escape. 4 But
ye, brethren, are not in darkness, that that day should overtake you as a thief. 5 Ye are all the children of light, and the children of the day: we are not of the night, nor of darkness. 6
Therefore let us not sleep, as do others; but let us watch and be sober.
In verse 1, Paul was saying that he didn't need to write to them about the times and the seasons. Times and the seasons of what? The second coming of Christ that he was just writing to them about in 1 Thess 4:13-18. In those verses he talked about what will happen to believers on the day Christ returns. In 1 Thess 5:2-3 he talks about what will happen to unbelievers on that day.
Notice that Paul tells his readers in relation to the day of the Lord and the sudden destruction it will bring that they should "not sleep, as do others, but let us watch and be sober". Why would he have said that to them if the sudden destruction he talked about that would occur on the day of the Lord couldn't happen in the lifetimes of his readers? That would make no sense.
In your view it's like he was telling them to be careful to be alert and remain as "children of light" instead of children of darkness so that they would be ready and not experience the "sudden destruction" that would come 1000+ years after Christ's return? Huh?! You have Paul warning people about something that couldn't possibly happen in their lifetimes. How does that make any sense?
You do the same thing with those Peter was addressing.
2 Peter 3:10 But
the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up. 11
Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all holy conversation and godliness, 12 Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat?
Peter has a very similar message to his readers regarding the day of the Lord as Paul had for his. Like Paul, he warned his readers about being careful about what kind of people they were and to make sure they were being godly people. Why did he tell them that if what he was talking about couldn't possibly affect them in their lifetimes? That makes no sense. You're making Paul and Peter out to be deceptive false teachers because you have them warning people about things that couldn't possibly affect them personally or happen in their lifetimes. We need to think more highly of Paul and Peter than that. They warned people about their behavior before the day of the Lord because the destruction accompanying the day of the Lord could potentially arrive in their lifetimes. That's the only way to make any sense out of them warning people about the coming global destruction.
fire is NOT coming down and consuming everything in Revelation 19, Revelation 14, or Revelation 6.
You add it to them when the bible doesn't.
We've been over this. The method of destruction is not given literally in those passages. If you want to believe that Christ will slay the nations using a literal sword that comes out of His mouth, then that's on you for lacking the discernment to recognize symbolic language.
Same thing in regards to Revelation 14. If you want to think it's talking about a literal winepress being used to destroy people, then so be it, but it again shows your lack of discernment as it comes to being able to differentiate between literal and figurative language.
Same thing in regards to Revelation 6. If you want to think that stars will literally fall to the earth, then so be it, but that would show your lack of understanding that even one star falling to the earth would completely annihilate the earth. And if you want to think that heaven will literally roll up like a scroll at that time, so be it. But, it's clearly figurative language. So, Revelation 6:12-17 cannot be taken literally.
That passage does announce the time for the wrath of the Lamb to come down, but what it describes as happening at that point is not to be taken literally. It's just figuratively describing the fact that the final global wrath of the Lamb is just about to come down on the earth at that point. Which explains while there would be silence in heaven at the seventh seal because Jesus, His angels, and the souls of the dead in Christ will have departed heaven at the seventh seal. At that point the dead in Christ will be resurrected and those who are alive will join them with their changed, immortal bodies to meet Jesus "in the air". Jesus will then burn up the earth in taking vengeance on all unbelievers (2 Thess 1:7-10, 2 Peter 3:10-13) which will completely catch them off guard like a thief in the night.