Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If saying that God did something involves a "God of the gaps" argument, then some "God of the gaps" arguments have true conclusions.* Secular orthodoxy imposes upon us the dogma that "God of the gaps" is always a bad argument, or in other words: that "God did it" is never an acceptable response. This secular dogma needs to simply be rejected, for it is based on the premise that God either does not exist or does not do anything. More precisely, it is based on the naturalistic premise that miracles never occur (and therefore God does not or cannot perform miracles).
Your apologetics source basically says, "God did some things, but only those things that Scripture attests to." This is also unacceptable, for it results in the conclusion that God does not do anything miraculous after the final page of Scripture was written. On this view God has not done anything miraculous for at least the past 1800 years.
The answer is that God does miraculous things, and most of these things are not attested to by Scripture. When is it appropriate to conclude that God did something miraculous? Roughly speaking, when 1) there is no plausible natural explanation, and 2) there is a positive reason to believe that God would be acting.
* Note that the primary sense of a "God of the gaps" argument is an argument from ignorance for God's existence, not a mere attribution of a mysterious event to God's causality.
Another angry person.
My analysis is just stating facts about the impact of amnesty on social security. I do not know the potential numbers, ages, or incomes of the group that will most likely have amnesty. However, I do state some factors to consider when it comes to social security solvency.Even if there was a plan to grant amnesty, they would still have to meet the same eligibility requirements for Social Security as everyone else. That means working and paying into SS for at least 10 years.
In answer to your question, a "feminine man" is a man who has more feminine traits (physical, mental, emotional, virtues, vices, interests) than masculine ones. A "masculine woman" is the inverse; a woman with more masculine traits than feminine ones.
They certainly learned the "shut it down" tactic from the GOP Congress.Perhaps the students have learned a lesson about voter apathy.
“In the March election, in which less than 20 percent of students turned out to vote, Shut It Down won the presidency and vice presidency, and secured 22 of 45 seats in the assembly.”
The dragon - Satan - is not any of the kings. The 7th king will be the little horn person - who after being killed and brought back to life, becomes the beast - king 8.There are 3 men involved here: Rev 17:10-11's 6th King (the 'one that is'), the 7th King (the one that stays for a little while), and the 8th King that is of the 7.
There is also the dragon, beast, and False Prophet from Rev 16:13, each having a mouth.
The dragon is the one with 7 crowns (Rev 12:3) - he is the 7th King. The dragon can't be the 6th King because, while having 7 mountains which symbolize 7 heads, there are not 7 crowns. The 6th King fits as to having 7 heads and 10 horns (Rev 17:7), but not 7 crowns.
28 “Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest."
article said:In Mexico, President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, who has also cracked down on NGOs he doesn’t like, is pushing sweeping constitutional reforms targeting the country’s judicial system.
His plan to replace Mexico’s current judicial appointment process with popular elections for all judgeships at the federal and state level might sound democratic — except for the fact that López Obrador’s Morena party will effectively decide who the candidates are.