Trump administration concedes DOGE team may have misused Social Security data
- American Politics
- 5 Replies
Is anyone ok with thus?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Easy as
One, two, three
Or simple as
Do re mi
ABC, one, two, three, baby, you and me girl
ABC
Easy as
One, two, three
Or simple as
Do re mi
ABC, one, two, three, baby, you and me
I could have sworn ancient Israel was a monarchy. In fact, the whole point of a coming Messiah was to restore that Kingdom, with a King sitting at the throne. The last thing it was, was a Republic.
There are two main evidences to this. The Bible and history or nature. We’ll start with what is the easy way to learn it. The Bible. After the time of martial law during Moses and Joshua. They established Ancient Israel as a free republic. Although it may seem a little odd, this due to God’s purpose in separating the nation from others to bring the world his word and the Messiah though it. The Mosaic law was Ancient Israel’s constitution. There was no provision in it for imposed central government. It had 12 states, and each was to be self-governing. Their constitution said to choose or elect wise leaders to lead each state in keeping the law. Then there was the Levitical tribe of priests who had parcels in each state who were the pastors of their day. Tithes which were in essence voluntary taxes were to be given to them for their support since they were not given enough land to support themselves. But the taxes were not collected. They were voluntarily given, and the priesthood had no physical authority. They could only influence the public. Their military was 100% militia each state controlled its own militia. To show how loose or free to choose their own way this confederation of tribes was in relation to the nation. The tribe of Benjamin went total Sodom and Gomorrah at one point. This was hardly a theocracy as some would mistakenly compare it to theocratic monarchies.
Within this structure God would supernaturally ordain judges to influence or lead the tribes in time of war or oppression by foreign armies and bring them back to God when they went astray. The republic lasted 400 years. Then they decided they no longer wanted the personal responsibility necessary to maintain a free republic and voted God out and a king in. They said they wanted a king to fight their battles for them. God warned them sternly that their kings would enslave them, but they refused to listen. Take heed to this you Christian nationalists who desire a “Christian prince” to fight your spiritual and physical battles for your nation. This is the pattern upon which the United States was founded but adjusted to fit its circumstances. 13 independent states with their own constitutions, that like the mosaic law laid out the people’s religious responsibilities necessary for remaining free republics. You can see these religious responsibilities highlighted in each state constitution on this web page- The Original State Constitutions. Like Ancient Israel these responsibilities relied on personal religious devotion and also like ancient Israel’ s Levitical priesthood, pastors were to help this along. In fact some states required towns to hire a pastor of their denominational choice and build a meeting house for religious instruction. Public education was religious in nature, including university level and required by the states but run by churches. Almost every state had a favored Christian denomination, but all allowed complete religious freedom for all Christians. This freedom extended to super minorities of other religions but generally they were not allowed to hold law making offices.
Finally, just like Ancient Israel's republic had supernaturally ordained judges to bring revival, awaking or divine truth that had grown dim to light. The USA operated on the same level. America’s judges were the George Whitfield’s, the Wesley’s, the Jonathon Edwards and Charles Finney’s. Just to name a few. This is so important in understanding the difference between biblically ordained republics versus progressive government. Our government in the states or federally were never given the power to determine truth. In fact, the founders argued prolifically against government ever being able to have that power. Self-evident truth as stated in the Declaration of Independence was already determined in the Bible. It was to be ascertained by the people themselves, and government was ordained to do nothing more than to protect the process though which people could ascertain the truth themselves. This is precisely what Jesus meant when he stated his kingdom was not of this world. Truth cannot be imposed from the top down the way the world kingdoms operated. This was due to human beings being so easily corrupted by the love of money and Government is the easiest way for people to get their hands on other folks money. If government is given that kind of power it will not be truth they are imposing upon the population anyway. It will be lies that empower rulers and give them access to the fruits of the labor of the people. Progressive government turns a biblically based republic on its head. Government determines truth and imposes it. Its tendency is towards corruption exists simply because government now has the power to do so.
After this, these 13 states formed central government for two specific purposes. National defense and keeping peace between the states regarding trade, currency and other interstate relations. Before the states signed on to this a Bill of Rights was added to the federal constitution that greatly restricted its power over the states. First and foremost was the 1st amendment that deals with the most important part of what would be a successful republic. It’s religion, the religion of and about Jesus Christ and its relation to human government which really needs contextualized into the time 1st amendment was written rather than within the context of today’s popular thought. In the world the colonies just fought a war against. The state controlled religion through state run churches. It was not a matter of “the church” running the state which is how it is portrayed in modern education as propaganda. These state-run churches were created to control Christianity. A witness to this fact is that up until Northern Europe won the right in war for the general population to posses and own Bibles. The personal possession of the Bible without the specific permission of the authorities in supposedly Christian theocratic monarchies was illegal. It led to unauthorized preaching that if caught often led to the death penalty. It did not matter what the hierarchies in these state-run churches wanted because some of those hierarchies wanted the people to own Bibles. The state did not. The rulers had read it. They, just like every communist dictatorship that arose in the modern world understood the Bible in the hands of the general public was a threat to their rule. They were correct about this and history sure bears witness to it. Due to the commercial printing press that arose right when the Roman Empire finally fell in 1453 AD. Bibles began to be illegally mass produced making it far to difficult for the authorities to keep up with it. A Bible reading public led to the Dutch Republic where Bible ownership and reading along with the personal possession of a firearm was required for political participation. Yet right across the border you could still get burned at the stake for getting caught with an unauthorized Bible. The thinking that developed due to a Bible reading public led to the development and establishment of a free world and while that thinking was still developing, it migrated north America.
In North America the Bible was the basis of all public education. It was the main course of study and everything else surrounded it. It remained like this until progressivism began to get a foothold in the early 20th century. At that point the progressive movement started to chip away at public educations use of the Bible in non-sectarian public education. Their crowning achievement came in the 1960’s when in defiance of the 1st amendment a bastardized reading of the 14th amendment was used by a progressive supreme court declared itself, actually declare the state ruler, over the religious views of the people and their states. Republican led states should have immediately defied this ruling, and still should today. However, my assumption is since the courts had after one hundred years of effort by the Republican party to pass civil rights laws finally started to rule in favor of those efforts. Republicans did not want to upset the apple cart of actually being able to enforce the 14th and 15th amendments on states who were violating them. So, in my opinion, settled for allowing judicial supremacy over the religious\political views of the people. But as we can now all see, this came with a horrendous cost. You see, the progressive ideology, no matter how it is presented, as democracy or whatever. makes the state supreme. State supremacy is simply not possible when a population is intimately aware of the contents of the Bible. Hence the reason for all dictatorships, kings, emperors to keep it from the public. Progressive government which is by its very nature is corrupt due to its violation of the laws of nature and natures God has and will continue to try to keep the public an ignorant as possible about an accurate understanding of the Bibles teachings. And by the way will quote it extensively in a nation where it has influence for purely political advantageous reasons. They all have. So now we'll look at the 1st amendment within the context it was written rather than the context a progressive supreme court gave it that has now been popularized by progressive dominated public education systems.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Continued in the next comment or go to link.
![]()
Progressive Government Verses Biblically Based Republics
Progressive government is the antithesis of a Biblically based republic.wordservice.org
I can only respond with a verse I remember when I feel like this.I am aware of the change but do not agree with it. It might be seen as a redefinition that serves the needs of people that make their living from "treating" those they see as afflicted with a disability. Using the word "autism" (which previously described severe brain injury or malformation) allows them to present Aspergers as a mental defect as opposed to a normal neurological variant.
The four boys that Hans Asperger originally observed he considered autistic because they had less interest in group play. This almost lead them to be exterminated. These boys ended up living "normal" and even successful lives.
I continue to use the word Aspergers because there could be the rise of another Nazi regime that would want to exterminate my children or grandchildren.
I agree with this whole works thing, but what is acceptable?
Take a look at the Christians in verse 22. They run circles around me.
Matthew 7:21 “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven.
Matthew 7:22 Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’
Matthew 7:23 And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’
What is their crime?
Might be nice to know.
Actually sheriff's departments are not enforcing immigration laws. Only the Feds can do that. So the agents are not do SO jobs.Federaltroopsagents to do what the local sheriff’s department usually does?
“Big Government” is just fine now with Conservatives, why’s that, one wonders?
Exactly. With as much precision and good will as possible. And yet I don’t see that all Protestants will ever in a million years be willing to consider such things even perfectly explained. They think they know so much better. Humility is in short supply.As an ex-Protestant who hopes the churches will one day reunify, I'm not particularly fond of the term. Wolsley might have accurately explained the term "co" in the Latin sense, but if the Catholic Church ever hopes to bring the Protestants under her umbrella, areas of potential confusion need to be dealth with.
Don’t get me wrong. There is no inherent moral distinction between donating one’s face or organs after death. Indeed, I support face transplants as a legitimate medical treatment. The recipient in this case certainly benefited:Vall d’Hebron University Hospital in Barcelona has performed the world’s first face transplant with a donor who passed away from euthanasia.[...]
Around 100 medical professionals took part in the partial face transplant, a highly complex operation using neurovascular microsurgery techniques that lasted about 24 hours.
In presenting the milestone procedure, the healthcare director, Maria José Abadías, highlighted the “extraordinary generosity of the donor,” the “collective effort” behind the operation and the “pride” of all workers who took part in it.
So, it isn’t the act of transplanting a face per se that gave me the heebie-jeebies. Rather, this case furthers the ongoing commodification of suicidal people who have been accepted for legalized killing. Here’s what I mean:After suffering necrosis of facial tissues due to a bacterial infection two years ago, she was forced into intensive care. When she came out, she found that she could not eat or breathe properly, eventually resulting in her receiving the transplant.
“Now my life is starting to get a little better,” she explained. “After four months, I can talk, I can eat, I can drink again.”
And so I tell you, every kind of sin and slander can be forgiven, but blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven (Matthew 12:31).
Then said Mary unto the angel, How shall this be, seeing I know not a man?
catholicstand.com
It is true that one has to be aware of dangers and threats, but things have to be kept in balance. Let us say you have an enemy at work. They do what they can to make your life at work difficult. However, if you think about it too much, you will not be able to focus on the work at hand. You will make mistakes, and those might be attributed to your enemy when they were not your enemy’s doing. The worst part is that you will take your anxiety home with you and not relax and treat your family and friends properly. Your enemy will live in your head rent free and cause damage to you with no effort. Focusing on the works of Satan in this world will do the same thing, and he will get credit for evil he had nothing to do with. You will see enemies where there are none, and the fear will lead away from faith in God. Satan would like nothing better than for us to fight meaningless battles while he wages real war.
If you mean that you hope it was not some loud dogmatic point forbidding us to worry and threatening anyone who ever has with hellfire, no it was not like that. We have this priest who is still training, and he comes to us once a month in order to experience life at the more catholic end of the range, I think his other church is more low church style. He is very kind and gentle, and he quoted the Sermon on the Mount, and the focus was about trusting God to provide for us.5th Sunday after Epiphany here. I preached on Isaiah 58, and letting the oppressed go free. Which does oddly relate to questions of racism, at least in our context...
Hmm. I hope that came with some nuance?
The complexity of the characters. The intriguing plot echoing the futility of war. How there are no clear good guys, the cultural impact of nuclear weapons.What's incredible about Attack on Titan?