• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

ABC pulls Jimmy Kimmel Live after comments on Charlie Kirk

So the answer is yes. Cancel culture is okay when it's people you don't like. Got it.



lol what are you talking about? We're talking about Jimmy Kimmel, who didn't even say anything about Charlie Kirk. His comments were about Trump, Kash Patel, and the rest of the MAGAsphere.

You can watch the whole segment here:
Login to view embedded media

uh... k?
Jokes at the expense of the powerful should always be punished.

There is no lace for the Court Jester in America.
Upvote 0

Charlie Kirk and Our Christian Founding

Sorry if I missed this one if already posted. Possibly, there wasn't a transcript of his incredible talent on display. If his response is not fit for Christians to comment on here, then that is really unfortunate. This video (scroll down) which I believe has been out for some months has been hacked up depending on where you go to get it. This transcript is the fullest I could find and it is a little fuller than the video (sorry). Otherwise, enjoy patriots!

Charlie Kirk and America’s Christian Founding (Q&A)

Questioner: As stated yesterday by a couple of my friends that our country was not founded on Christian principles. Our country was founded on common law. Uh because the declaration only refers to God four times and in the Constitution doesn't refer to God at all. It Only articulated the structure of government. And, is common law Christian in nature or is it not.

Charlie Kirk: So, first of all, remember that we were a collection of states and colonies and you need to read the state constitutions before anything else. Nine out of 13 of the original states required you to be a Bible believing Christian to serve in government. All 13 required you to have a declaration of faith, nine out of the thirteen required you to be a Protestant, except Maryland which was Catholic which still required a declaration. In almost every single one of the original state constitutions, Pennsylvania included, they had I profess Lord in Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior in the original state constitutions. Secondly, 55 out of 56 of the original signers of the declaration were Bible believing church attending Christians.

You asked about common law. So common law is inherited from Blackstone who was Christian. It a common law is an outgrowth of the scriptures. So let's go to three principles of common law.

1. Presumption of innocence,​
2. Due process,
3. Jury of your peers.

All three are biblical principles. So, and all wrapped into the ultimate biblical principle that you shall not favor justice if you are richer or poor, which is in Leviticus 19. Right before most famous part of Leviticus 19, which is that you should love your neighbor as yourself. But before that is that in the administration of justice, you shall not favor the rich or the poor, which is the idea of blind justice. We get that in the west, which is incorporated also in the New Testament ideal, “neither slave nor Greek nor Jew. You're all one in Jesus Christ”. So, we got the idea of human equality. These are all biblical ideas. Is they're not enlightenment ideas, which is they kind of get conflated at the time.

But more importantly than that, they say that God was only mentioned four times in the Declaration of Independence. Well, that's a big deal. Okay. Laws of nature and nature's God. The last paragraph of the declaration reads as a prayer. It says, "We appeal to the supreme judge of the universe”. Who's the judge of the universe? Jesus Christ. As it says in Revelation that Jesus will judge the earth on his throne. This. So in the declaration they were praying to Christ our Lord as a prayer very specifically.

Thirdly as I said on stage yesterday, Deuteronomy was by far the most quoted book religious or non-religious in the time of the founding when they were putting together constitution more than John Lock, more than Montisscu, more than Blackstone. So the book of Deuteronomy which talked about laws, customs, traditions, it was Moses farewell address as he's, you know, about to say goodbye. Say, "Hey, good luck in Canaan guys. Here's how you should set up your form of government."

But finally, and most importantly, let's look at actually what the founders said. John Adams seamlessly said, "The Constitution was only written for a moral and religious people. It was holy and adequate for the people of any other.” The body politic of America was so Christian and was so Protestant that our form and structure of government was built for the people that believed in Christ our Lord. One of the reasons we're living through a constitutional crisis is that we no longer have a Christian nation but we have a Christian form of government and they're incompatible. So you cannot have liberty if you do not have a Christian population.

So then they'll go to the first amendment which is has two parts of the first amendment which get conflated. First of all, separation church and state is not in the US constitution. That is a single letter that Thomas Jefferson wrote in 1807 to the Danbury Baptist Convention in Massachusetts assuring them that the government would not come after the church. Okay, which is the opposite of what they would say. However, that was then resurrected by the Warren Court and the Burger Court in the 60s where they said, "Hey, you know, all of a sudden we're now going to make this as if it's the Constitution."

It does say in the Constitution two things, which is the establishment clause and the free free expression clause. The establishment clause is that Congress shall make no law prohibiting the free exercise thereof. What they were most worried about was a Presbyterian or, a Anglican or, a Quaker type religion taking over Federal Government, Instead, it was that there is not going to be a state-run religion or a state-run government. Did you know that one of the first acts of Congress was taxpayer funded Bible printing and distribution? Did you know there were Church services held in the Supreme Court building as late as the Jackson presidency in the 1820s? But going back to this idea of separation of church and state, it's not constitutional because you go a layer deeper.

People that even say that, do you believe in separation of morality and state? Nobody does. So all laws are reflection of morality and all morality comes from somewhere. There is no such thing as neutral morality. And we believe what the founders believe because they put it in the halls of Congress. They put it in the Supreme Court and they put it all throughout the country which is that the decalogue the ten commandments, is the core morality of how a society and a civilization should should exist. Right? The the ten commandments of every person. And finally and this is the kicker. If the founding fathers were not Bible believing church uh church Christians, why did they put Leviticus on the liberty bill? Not John, not Psalms, not Proverbs, not Genesis. Leviticus. Most Americans can't spell Leviticus. Leviticus 25:19. Proclaim liberty throughout the land of which you are in.

It is one of the most sinister, most unsubstantiated lies that does not come up against any sort of academic scrutiny. This idea the founding fathers were a bunch of enlightenment common law deists.

The reason they hate it is because if they the reason they must say this is that if we actually go back to our Christian roots and we go back to where we once were, it's America's best hope for revival and for a great future."

Login to view embedded media
The Founding Fathers, Deism, and Christianity | Christianity, Enlightenment & Religion | Britannica The Founding Fathers, Deism, and Christianity | Christianity, Enlightenment & Religion | Britannica
  • Like
Reactions: DuaneR
Upvote 0

Charlie Kirk Didn’t Shy Away From Who He Was. We Shouldn’t, Either

Kirk said some number of deaths are acceptable to keep the second amendment.
I think he was just parroting right wing slogans there. His concern that Epstein's associates might escape, and his refusal to acceptably condemn LGBTQ people shows that he had a conscience.. Irony is, that's what might have killed him; the extreme far right hated him for it.
  • Winner
Reactions: NxNW
Upvote 0

God, omnibenevolent or omnipotent and omniscient?

Free will it seems is always the answer to why there is any such thing as sin in the first place ... in the end, if God had not created (literal) according to the Bible) angels, the problem would have never existed to begin with ... unless you believe sin existed in God before all things and this is his way of purging it out of himself, at the seemingly expense of others, including his only son (who knew no sin) ... which begs the question of why would he purge something from himself that has always been in him in the first place ... a form of circular logic ...

Thought is the beginning of sin ...

The word is not God, it's the content (through perception) of the word that is God to us ...
Upvote 0

ABC pulls Jimmy Kimmel Live after comments on Charlie Kirk

More liberal lies and misdirection. Do you need to be reported to the Department of Correct Thought for re education?
Here I thought we had left the ministry of truth behind with the Biden administration and comedy was made legal again.
Upvote 0

JB Pritzker Claims He Has Never Called Republicans ‘Nazis’ – Gets Proven Wrong by Videos of His Own Words

(Nerdy voice) Well technically, he never actually called Republicans 'Nazis,' he only compared them to Nazis on more than one occasion. So he is obviously telling the truth.
He's not even comparing Republicans to Nazis. He's talking about Trump, the Trump administration, and neo-Nazis in those clips.
  • Informative
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

Trump to designate antifa a 'major terrorist organization'

What about FBI raids instead?
Raids? That’s for car wash employees and day laborers, not international terrorist organizations. Are you guys even serious about this? It doesn’t seem like it.
  • Like
Reactions: Sif
Upvote 0

ABC pulls Jimmy Kimmel Live after comments on Charlie Kirk

It's got nothing to do with censorship. Mainstream NBC news is telling the truth about Tyler Robinson being a supporter of the political left.
It has everything to do with censorship.
It does. I'm smiling ear to ear over Kimmel going down in flames. And I can't want to see who's next. Burn woke burn, muhahaha.
I’m sure Kimmel will be just fine. I’m more concerned about the chilling effect this is meant to have on other opposing views, as we see with NBC conforming to the administration’s narrative that Charlie Kirk’s killer was inspired by the left when you have the killer himself citing Kirk as the source of his anger.
  • Like
Reactions: JosephZ
Upvote 0

Eric Trump on Charlie Kirk’s Legacy and the Radical Left – “This Could Have Been the Greatest Mistake These People Have Ever Made” (VIDEO)

They are reading books promoting and normalizing topics like trans ideology. Examples include:
-Our Rainbow
-Pride 123
-This Day in June
-Peaceful Fights for Equal Rights
-Rainbow: The First Book of Pride
-Stonewall: A Building. An Uprising. A Revolution
-Pride: A Story of Harvy Milk and the Rainbow Flag

Now please dont waste your time trying to convince me that the intention is not the indoctrination of children to normalize sexual deviance.
None of those books talk about sexual deviance. Some of them talk about not being judgmental jerks towards LGBTQA+ people (which I think is basic common sense and not being jerks is a pretty common book theme for young kids) but there’s no discussions about sex, deviant or otherwise. If you got a book that talks about sex acts, I’d return it… Sounds like it’s not the right book.
Upvote 0

The Conjunction of Opposites

We are not given any depictions of Satan with his own flesh body
I didn't say he had a flesh body. I said he had a body.
In your position He's actually not capable of saving anyone by His Own Power and can only be activated by YOUR POWER. I consider that utter nonsense
Is this verse utter nonsense?

John 3:18 "He that believeth on Him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God."


He does the saving, he is the way to atonement. But it doesn't mean we don't have to accept him and sin the rest of our lives without a care in the world and expect to be saved. That's nonsense. And not biblical.

Devils can not be reconciled to the fact

Who's said anything about devils being reconciled? That's why it's hard to converse with you at times. You continue to make claims that no one has stated, etc. Satan and his are bound for the Lake of Fire period. That's a fact.

I don't believe God is eliminated by your chance or anyone else's chance at activating Him or more accurately for most, NOT activating Him. That entire notion is actually repulsive, and certainly NO GOD.

God is not eliminated in any aspect. But we have to believe in truth.

You keep stating the very opposite. That no one is condemned. As I stated only those in Christ are reconciled. But again, you don't believe that even when the verses are being posted right in front of you.

That's why God is so long suffering because he doesn't want anyone to perish. But there is a condition -repentance. That change of heart and mind -a new way of thinking. That comes with true acceptance and belief in Christ. If it's true repentance. And before you start another round of "no one is sinless, etc" I am not stating that but repentance comes with a new way of thinking. If that's not the case, repentance has not set in yet. It's that simple. Is it hard to overcome certain things? Yes of course but the "want" has to be there. And of course it's God that tries the heart and mind. He knows.

Why do you continually ignore all the verses about repentance?​

And that would be quite entirely heretical
It was prophesized long ago that he would sit on the throne in the sides of the north and proclaim to be God. That has not happened yet. If one is here during that time and not prepared to have the gospel armor on to fight the the wiles (trickery) of the devil so they can stand in "the evil day" than they would be like the 'foolish virgins' on watch. He and his angels will be here putting on a show and most of the world will fall for it.
As Paul states, our gathering back together will not proceed until that happens first. And that's why he teaches about having the gospel armor on during that time. He and Christ both give strict warnings about not being deceived by any means. He that endures to the end shall be saved. And you don't don a disguise unless eyes are on you. Who's our real Angel of Light? Of course Christ is. But he will be here "instead of Christ" He comes first. The Thessalonians were confused on the timing and Paul set them straight.
or eternally annhilated you'd have a point. There's not even a named person even threatened with such a fate.
Than you're not living by every word as you proclaim. Christ himself stated to fear the one that can destroy both body and soul in hell. He tells us in his Revelation to the churches that only those that had repented and overcame when they had fallen would "not" have their names blotted out of the book of life. What is the opposite of life? Death. Just as Paul was a witness to -everlasting destruction. And no one has to be named. Judgement Day has not arrived. But he makes it clear who's bound for the Lake of Fire. Anyone not written in the book of life. Satan and his angels are not in the book of life. No matter how much you skip that fact. Judgement Day is for everyone and all they've done, good or bad. And anyone not found in the book of life will be thrown into the Lake of Fire. That is the second death.

Christ also states blessed are those that are in the first resurrection because the second death has no power over them. Meaning those who don't take part still have that threat over them. But you are claiming Christ is speaking untruths and that no one has that threat over them. And you talk about taking power and truth away?

I'll stick to Christ's teachings and warnings.

You claim to live by every word of God but you ignore (like Christ's teachings to the churches about repentance) so much to keep to your doctrine. We have to take the bible as a whole.
Upvote 0

There’s a Giant Flaw in Human History

Let's make a stone vase!

Login to view embedded media
Really, once you can make stuff go around and around, you can do all sorts of things.
I agree, but its getting it to go round and round really steady and then have a cutting arm that is fixed and not human held. In other words a mechanical arm that is similar to CNC cutting ie

1758193615122.png


Or maybe. Something that can change angles and move in and out without any change or deviation. A freehand would cause many deviations.
1758193698691.png


I don't know how true this is but a comparison was done that to achieve the precision in the vase it would be like drawing a perfectly straight 10 metre line by hand to within a couple of hairs of being perfectly straight.

But I think it would be harder than just drawing a line. You would have to do it in the hardest stones. Not just a line but near perfect spheres, cones, arcs and circles in granite by hand.
Upvote 0

John 4:23–24: How Should We Worship God in Spirit and in Truth?

From the moment we start believing in the Lord, although we may pray, read the Bible and sing hymns every day, and go to church, praise the Lord, and listen to sermons every week, does worshiping God in spirit and in truth involve only these external practices? We can recall that when the Samaritan woman asked the Lord Jesus where she should worship God, and the Lord Jesus replied: “The hour comes, when you shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father. … when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeks such to worship him. God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth” (John 4:21, 23–24). The Lord Jesus clearly told people God’s will and requirements: It doesn’t matter where one worships God, nor should one follow any rule or ceremony, but rather one must worship God in spirit and in truth. This is also our principle of practice for worshiping God. But most of the time we only focus our effort on our external practices; we are careful to pray a little longer and say a little more; we read verses in the Bible over and over, trying to memorize them; we attend church in all weather, wind or rain, hot or cold; we organize all kinds of activities or put on various shows to praise the Lord, and we always take part with a positive attitude; and so on. From the outside, we appear to be expending much effort and paying a high price to praise the Lord, and that we suffer greatly, but how many times do we speak what’s in our hearts when we pray to God? How many times during the course of reading the Bible, singing hymns or attending church and listening to sermons do we make efforts to be close to God and contemplate the Lord’s words? How many times as we worship God do we seek the Lord’s will and understanding of the Lord’s words? Some brothers and sisters have practiced in this way for many years, yet they still don’t understand the truth, they have no knowledge of the Lord, and when things happen to them, they still sin frequently and live within the bondage and constraints of sin. In this we are faced with a serious problem, which is that most of the time we spend praying, reading the Bible, going to church and listening to sermons, we are merely going through the motions. We are not actually worshiping God in spirit and in truth, nor are we practicing the truth to satisfy God. No matter how well we may keep to these external practices, God does not approve.

So, how can we worship God in spirit and in truth as we pray or read the Bible? Let’s read a passage of God’s words together. God’s words say, “A normal spiritual life is a life lived before God. When praying, one can quiet one’s heart before God, and through prayer, one can seek the Holy Spirit’s enlightenment, know God’s words, and understand God’s will. By eating and drinking of His words, people can gain a clearer and more thorough understanding of God’s current work. They can also gain a new path of practice, and will not cling to the old; what they practice will all be to achieve growth in life. As for prayer, it is not about speaking a few nice-sounding words or breaking down in tears before God to show how indebted you are; rather, its purpose is to train oneself in the use of the spirit, allowing one to quiet one’s heart before God, to train oneself to seek out guidance from God’s words in all matters, so that one’s heart can be drawn to a fresh new light each day, and so that one will not be passive or lazy and may set foot upon the right track of putting God’s words into practice

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,876,730
Messages
65,388,194
Members
276,292
Latest member
David.Dantonio