Latest activity

DaisyDay · Wednesday at 2:24 PM

BeckyJ said:
"Biden was not letting people come in illegally."
Yes he did, by the millions.
Jesus Christ was not a displaced immigrant

He was for a time with Joseph and Mary when they fled to Egypt.

BCP1928 · Wednesday at 2:24 PM

Landon Caeli said:
They can no longer be considered Eastern after the diaspora. Now they're multicultural, just like the United States, made up of immigrants from over 100 countries.

...If any two countries in the world should be supporting Israel, it's the United States and the United Kingdom.

The issue is not support, but uncritical support.

RileyG · Wednesday at 2:22 PM

Welcome back!

timothyu · Wednesday at 2:22 PM

PloverWing said:
A religion is a way of life. What distinction do you have in mind?

God’s Will is we serve each other in need. Man’s will is we serve the religion, as the Sanhedrin also did

RileyG · Wednesday at 2:22 PM

Welcome!

Aaron112 · Wednesday at 2:21 PM

Vambram said:
The millions of illegal immigrants should be deported.

BeckyJ said:
Yes they should!!

@BeckyJ question to ponder .... no answer required ...
Should all idolators be deported ?
(if they do not turn from their wicked ways and start to seek God)
(Many are already 'legal' citizens.)

BCP1928 · Wednesday at 2:21 PM

Hentenza said:
Because a fiction genre is not part of the Bible.

How do you know?

Hentenza said:
Subjective interpretations are valid such as God not having wings, etc. The creation story is not subjective in my opinion since I still believe that God is responsible for all of creation.

So do many people who have favored a non-literal interpretation over the last couple of thousand years.

Hentenza said:
Again, like any other book the text is interpreted based on context, the authors meaning, and literary structure. There are also literary devices to consider.

Correct.

Hentenza said:
When you read a book, do you start with an objective or subjective understanding?

Neither one. You have to read the book first.

Hentenza · Wednesday at 2:20 PM

Aaron112 said:
Neither.

So you read a sentence in a book what is your expectation? Is it literal or not? Do you read the sentence literally?

RileyG · Wednesday at 2:19 PM

Hail Mary,
Full of Grace,
The Lord is with thee.
Blessed art thou among women,
and blessed is the fruit
of thy womb, Jesus.
Holy Mary,
Mother of God,
pray for us sinners now,
and at the hour of our death.
Amen

FAITH-IN-HIM · Wednesday at 2:19 PM

HARK! said:
The laws are already on the books. You pose an intriguing question. How do we address an Administration that is derelict in their duty to uphold the law, and protect the American people?

The law presented in the book involves multiple complexities. Refer to my post #5 for further details. The asylum law discussed adds additional layers to immigration law. Stating that the law is already established and should be followed does not take into account a thorough evaluation of all relevant laws.

RileyG · Wednesday at 2:19 PM

Maria Billingsley said:
Premillennialism is a man made doctrine. A Millennium on earth is a man made doctrine. A rapture is merely Paul easing the minds of first century Christians on the subject of those who have died before them. Are they saved? He tells them they would rise first and those who are alive will join them in the air to meet Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Very poetic! But not meant to be a doctrine by any means.
Blessings

Well said, my sister in Christ!

Aaron112 · Wednesday at 2:18 PM

BeckyJ said:
Jesus Christ was not a displaced immigrant

Yet He was rejected by His Own people !

RileyG · Wednesday at 2:18 PM

RDKirk said:
Then will there be inequality of love in Heaven? Will the heavenly love between those who were married on earth be greater in any way that the general love among all in Heaven?

Will those who had few or even no love in the present time thus be eternally short on love in heaven compared to others who enjoyed many loves on earth?

I really don’t know. I assume in heaven, our love for one another will be perfected?

RileyG · Wednesday at 2:17 PM

Valletta said:
It could have been worse in the latter part of the last century. But now they do intensive screening and reporting, and for many many years the number of new credible abuse cases has been in the single digits.

Yup. Most of credibly accused priests are long dead or out of ministry.

Aaron112 · Wednesday at 2:16 PM

Hentenza said:
Subjective interpretations are valid such as God not having wings, etc.

That is a popular and accepted use of the word "interpretation(s)" , but in truth no interpretation (of the Bible) is needed, per se. For example (poor example perhaps), God does have wings, and legs, and thighs, hahaha
He owns the cattle on a thousand hills ! ALL creation is His.

Hentenza said:
When you read a book, do you start with an objective or subjective understanding?

Neither.

RileyG · Wednesday at 2:16 PM

Very interesting looking Church! Thanks for sharing!

essentialsaltes · Wednesday at 2:16 PM

Two Texas moms were forced to wait for urgent care after pregnancy loss. They died

At the outset of Texas’ abortion ban, medical experts worried pregnant women would die from delays in care. The Dallas Morning News examined two such cases.

interactives.dallasnews.com

I can't read the story, but it seems relevant.

RileyG · Wednesday at 2:16 PM

May God bring him home to holy Mother Church :prayer:

RileyG · Wednesday at 2:15 PM

Thanks for sharing! I wasn’t aware of that

RileyG · Wednesday at 2:15 PM

Ora pro nobis

RileyG · Wednesday at 2:14 PM

Praying for all pregnant women everywhere!

Daniel Carlton · Wednesday at 2:14 PM

This has probably been the church leaderships biggest error: trying to “look good” to those who are in darkness and abandoning faithfully obeying Gods word.

Trying to keep one foot in the bible and one foot in the world. And has brought on an expected spiritual catastrophe. Instead we should renounce the world and walk after Christ with no reservations.

RileyG · Wednesday at 2:14 PM

Holy lady, Ora pro nobis.

RileyG · Wednesday at 2:13 PM

FaithT said:
Will the RCC EVER loosen up on the celibacy rule and / or ordain openly gay priests and / or allow priests to marry? It seems to me that this is the only way to solve the problem of closeted homosexual clergy in the Church.

There are married priests in the Eastern rite and Anglican Ordinariate. In some cases, priests who converted from Protestant denominations who are married are allowed to keep their wives and children.

It’s a discipline, not a doctrine.

Latest activity

Latest activity

Filter

Forum statistics

Share this page