Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
….and they ultimately answered to God for their crimes.Yup. Most of credibly accused priests are long dead or out of ministry.
Sometimes I might have hope at least for truth, though rarely have expectations of truth.So you read a sentence in a book what is your expectation? Is it literal or not? Do you read the sentence literally?
Here are a couple of examples:Enforcing the law is not cruel. It's compassionate.
Hey hatred can blind people to the point of not seeing the truth. Im not saying it is true but it could be and would hate to judge someone’s walk with God.Please don't be fooled.
He's laughing all the way to the bank.
Or is that the stock market when he does a famous 90 day pause on tariffs? I think Wall Street have TACO wrong. It's not that Trump always chickens out, but that Trump always cashes out. That is he talks down the stock market by talking up his tariffs and threatening the world, and then gets a bunch of mates to place bets for him as he suddenly and mysteriously announces a 90-day reprieve. There were as some fairly suspicious same day trades the one time he did that.
I'm amazed that any of his supporters actually think he might be interested in any form of religion other than worshipping his own magnificence.
As I stated in my last post I am not going to discuss Bible apologetics here.Aesop's fables are fiction and they are "useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness".
Stories of all sorts teach us things.
??As to the conditions, the ones Obama had people in in his detention centers in the top picture are worse than what the current administration has going...
View attachment 368867
I am not going to cover Bible apologetics here. If you don’t like the terms objective and subjective you could substitute the terms with literal and non literal. The point is that anything that you read you start with reading each word literally and then interpret whether the sentence, paragraph, chapter, or book had a literal or non literal meaning.I don't think objective/subjective is a meaningful way to describe books.
Fiction, non-fiction, factual, allegorical, metaphorical seem reasonable to me. And as @BCP1928 said, if the book is unknown to me (that is, I didn't find it in a library already categorized for me), I don't know what it is until I read it.
As for fiction in the Bible, what are parables if not fiction? (I know there are some fringe people that think that the "sower" was actually some guy instead of a stand in for any agrarian, but really...)
I doubt that they broke in illegally.He was for a time with Joseph and Mary when they fled to Egypt.![]()
Aesop's fables are fiction and they are "useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness".Because 2 Timothy 3: 16-17 would not make any sense if the Bible was fiction.
Please don't be fooled.This is wonderful. I would be just as happy if any president in office makes this decision. It is the best thing possible for the country. I want a God fearing president. If he truly becomes Christian it will be interesting to watch him become humble haha.
What is important ?And isn't God able to take care of the millions who came in illegally, presuming they are in real need, though some are criminals coming it, but isn't God able to meet their needs if they are legit right where they are or even in another country with less strict immigration laws?
Because 2 Timothy 3: 16-17 would not make any sense if the Bible was fiction.How do you know?
Yep which it why I qualified my statement with “in my opinion”.So do many people who have favored a non-literal interpretation over the last couple of thousand years.
Correct.
Not really. Do you read the words literally or not?Neither one. You have to read the book first.
I don't think objective/subjective is a meaningful way to describe books.When you read a book, do you start with an objective or subjective understanding?
I gave you "THE WORD" not my words....and just as you said the flood covered all "the land".If that was the case He would have said so. In that case He would have said the world was flooded, not just "land." There's no way to parse one's way out of accepting that God did not say the world was flooded.
Indeed. This is the kind of thing that we often see from KJV-only people. Neglecting what the words actually mean in Hebrew leads one astray.
You gave me your revision of His words. As you learned, God didn't say that the flood was worldwide. Instead of "the world" (tevel) He said "the land" (erets). You might not realize that "erets" means an area, like "erets Israel" (the land of Israel). But there it is. Instead of relying on your own wishes, why not just accept God's word?
Don't be a scoffer; listen to Him.
He was for a time with Joseph and Mary when they fled to Egypt."Biden was not letting people come in illegally."
Yes he did, by the millions.
Jesus Christ was not a displaced immigrant
The issue is not support, but uncritical support.They can no longer be considered Eastern after the diaspora. Now they're multicultural, just like the United States, made up of immigrants from over 100 countries.
...If any two countries in the world should be supporting Israel, it's the United States and the United Kingdom.
God’s Will is we serve each other in need. Man’s will is we serve the religion, as the Sanhedrin also didA religion is a way of life. What distinction do you have in mind?