Having been an epistemological solipsist for over fifty years I've often wondered about how to tell whether the world around me is physically real or a simulation. The laws of physics seem to support the possibility of a simulation, but can't definitively answer the question, so I've been left to look for another means of determining whether I'm living in a simulation.
And never will unless there is a paradigm shift in thinking and metaphysics. Which has sort of happened with QM. But not yet fully realised. There are some interesting findings and the research into quantum consciousness is yeilding some promising results.
But the physical sciences that asssume methological naturalism can never theorectically explain reality. It can explain a certain aspect that is the physical parameters we navigate through our physical senses.
But this is not really the case because our senses are filtered through our minds which are influenced by non physical phenomena like conscious experience. Which can only be measured as a direct exeprience of reality.
In other words is (mind). It is the mind that is creating or percieving that there is some solid bits of matter existing outside the mind. But we cannot get outside our minds to know this is the case.
That's why I think experiential phenomena is tru reality. We keep sensing something beyond what the science says and theres nothing science can do. It persists and phenomenal beliefs that persists despite object reality are real.
Its just that we live in a material paradigm that is expressed all around us and its easy to only believe what we see. But if we stop and look we will find we virtually live by our conscious experiences everyday.
To that end I often wondered whether a character in a video game such as 'Grand Theft Auto' would be able to tell, simply by the behavior of the characters around it, that the world in which it was living wasn't 'real'. Would the fact that the characters seemed to act irrationally be a tip off to the possibility that it was living in a simulation? Or would it simply accept the simulation as real no matter how irrationally the characters in it behaved, or what the background story was.
Actually if the material paradigm is true and consciousness is just a epi-phenomena of the physical brain. Then technically if the entire brain is mapped out and understood then this should create consciousness. The idea that a certain level of complexity will create consciousness.
Ai is now coming up against this problem. Of making Ai in real time and able to make independent and conscious choices. Pumping in all the possibilities that a conscious brain would make.
Not sure if its possible because once again there is this theorectical gap from quantative to the qualitiative aspect of reality that wires, metal, electrical signals don't have and cannot create because they constitutionally are different.
But I think Ai will get awefully close that it mimicks consciousness to the point it can fool humans. In other words not so much to the actual characters in the games. But to the humans watching the characters in the games. And thats all that will be enough to more or less do the same thing. Which is once again fool people with a copy of reality. Just more complex and harder to tell for most.
Its happening now in that the IPhone is more or less an extention of humans now. They can't function without this. I get pictures of that sci fi movie where they put on the VR glasses or have some implant in the eyes and suddenly they are in another world with what looks like real people, buildings, lights, sound and action lol.
I ask this because more and more the world seems to be behaving more like a poorly written video game than a naturally evolving physical reality. For instance, Donald Trump seems to be such a stereotypical narcissistic villain that it's hard to believe that he wasn't purposefully created just for this role, and his popularity, in spite of his obvious character flaws seems to defy reason.
Or it may be that seeing others as villians in the first place is itself a programmed response lol. That the world is seen like a video game. In some ways a self fullfilling phenomena that mimick art and gaming. We become what we make ourselves. Feed on virtual reality and reality becomes virtual.
So the question is, does reality pass the Turing test? Does it act like a freely evolving natural world, or does it act more like an purposely designed simulation?
Both. Obviously we see the information aspect, nature reflects math. We need the physical aspect to navigate this physical plane. Thats how Gods creation is expressed that we exist. But there are deeper layers to reality that we all can know. People look for it in many ways and have always done so.
Modern science is itself now looking at other dimensions to explain reality.
Its not a case of whether we are in some sort of simulation, information or MInd reality. Or a fallen state that is yet to be fullfilled. But a case of which one. Or rather which metaphysical reality you believe.