The fascinating reformed theology paradox of Hebrew 6:4-6
- By RandyPNW
- General Theology
- 672 Replies
Apparently you mised it? I was saying that Judas initially embraced the gifts of the Spirit, the knowledge of God, and the ministry. But it was never a complete commitment to God's authority over his will.Yes - and yet he went out with the other disciples to heal the sick and drive out demons, Luke 9:1. We are not told that Judas didn't go.
Jesus had previously asked, "how can Satan drive out Satan?"
At some point, Judas not just turned to his Natural Man, rejecting the Spiritual Man, but exposed his deficient commitment to Jesus' lordship. He retained his own independent will, and ultimately, completely capitulated to it. He would drive out Satan, via exorcism, while he was obediently following Jesus' instructions to all 12, to go out into the cities of Israel, proclaiming the Kingdom of God, and delivering people by the power of God.
But when Judas decided to turn completely to the Natural Man, he turned away from ministry, from the power of God, and would no longer be able to drive out Satan. He had already shown that he was a devil, retaining his own independent will and tendency to reject Jesus. In turning completely over to the dark side he exposed that he was, in fact, a devil, and could no longer use God's power to cast out demons. He was himself a kind of "demon" and eventually became one.
He had the evil nature in him that did not completely commit to Jesus' lordship. I showed you the verses that suggest this. He was called a "demon" and a "traitor" in anticipation of what he would do, having already shown who he was beneath the veneer. He could obey, but he could not hide who he was.Who says Judas "turned away from salvation"?
I never said Judas was ever "Saved." He lacked the kind of faith that embraced God's lordship over his will. He only had faith to exercise spiritual gifts that Jesus offered to him. That was insufficient for Salvation, apart from a complete commitment to Jesus as Lord and Savior.
You're welcome to your view.In my view, his only mistake was that he didn't wait for/believe in the resurrection. Had he done so, he might have discovered that Jesus was willing to forgive him.
No. The negative consequence of Judas' complete turn to darkness was the social disgrace he exhibited in condemning an innocent man for profit.Are you saying that Jesus' death on the cross, which he had predicted and which was God's will, was a "negative consequence" of Judas' actions?
I answered that before, and I've answered it again in case I wasn't clear. Judas could exorcise demons when he walked in obedience in the ministry Jesus called him to--even though beneath the veneeer of "discipleship" he was viewed, by Jesus, as a "devil." He was not casting out demons by the power of Satan, but by the power of his spiritual calling.I was also asking how Judas could have been a devil yet sent out by Jesus to drive out devils. So far, no one has answered.
Not that this has anything to do with Hebrews 6 anyway.
It's clear that some people embrace Christ as Lord and Savior, despite their imperfections. It is equally clear that some reject Jesus as Lord and Savior, even if they obey in some respects and are able to do some good as they were created to do.I'm asking how anyone can know that Judas would not have turned back to Jesus after the resurrection - if he had lived long enough.
He wasn't perfect - who was? But Jesus came to die on the cross for us, and this would have happened with, or without, Judas' betrayal.
I don't have to know everything about Judas to know what he was about. The Scriptures tell us.You have no idea whether Judas saw all Jesus' miracles, heard his teaching, saw Lazarus raised from the dead and thought to deliberately reject all that and Messiah Jesus. Or whether he believed Jesus to be the Messiah - and everyone knew that the Messiah was going to be a warrior king and drive out the Romans - and, mistakenly, thought he could force Jesus' hand.
I disagree. I think it is perfectly appropriate to apply Heb 6. Judas gave up on the only source of atonement that could cover his sin.It still has nothing to do with Hebrews 6.
Therefore, he had no other means to apply for atonement for his sins. He had experienced enough of Jesus to know he was the source of atonement. But he obviously turned away, not just out of weakness, but out of malice and greed, and most especially out of a lack of complete acceptance of Jesus' authority over his will. The other Disciples did not hold back in their devotion to Christ as Lord and Savior.
God chose a bad actor to display Christ in his act of atonement for the sins of mankind. It is proper to use evil men to show true evil in the world, and to show flawed men in their weakness as objects of God's love and forgiveness. But evil men and weak men can stand on different sides of the room.Why then would Jesus have chosen someone who would never be made clean by his word and who was a devil?
Good theory, but I don't know all of Judas' rationale. I think you may be right that he wanted Jesus to deliver Israel as Messiah from the Romans, and fast. But in doing so he rejected Jesus' authority to slow things down in order to bring mercy not just to Israel but also to the Romans.How do you know? This is what I'm asking.
There IS a view that Judas thought that, as the Messiah, Jesus would drive the Romans out of Israel. But he was not doing that/not acting as fast as Judas wanted. So he betrayed him to force his hand - he fully expected Jesus to fight back.
When Jesus didn't - or maybe even couldn't - but was led away to die, Judas was remorseful, believed he had betrayed an innocent man, gave the money back and went and ended his own life.
Again, this is a lack of commitment to Jesus' authority. Judas could've been forgiven if he was less committed to his own authority over his will than Jesus' authority over his will.
Scriptures indicate Jesus knew in advance who Judas was. It doesn't explain how this came to be.What I'm challenging is the very dogmatic view that Judas deliberately chose to reject Jesus because Judas was a devil and had deliberately planned it. Jesus would have been arrested and crucified with, or without, Judas' involvement.
Upvote
0