What is your opinion of UFOs, ESP, poltergeists, etc? I realize that many people think these topics are laughable, but there are probably others who have experienced them (whatever they are). So what do you think is the explanation for this stuff?
What about angelic activity or other possibilities?Not sure of all cases; but IMO the majority of the "true" cases where no one was trying to ply a hoax, I believe there is demonic activity.
I think they're mostly misperceptions and misinterpretations, with a bit of 'telephone' exaggeration (i.e. the story becomes increasingly exotic with retelling), and occasional fraud.What is your opinion of UFOs, ESP, poltergeists, etc? I realize that many people think these topics are laughable, but there are probably others who have experienced them (whatever they are). So what do you think is the explanation for this stuff?
Since God's angels seem to need no vehicle for travel, I doubt an angelic explanation.What about angelic activity or other possibilities?
I have seen two flying objects that are not identifiable. I believe they are, however, something related to fallen beings if they are anything at all.What is your opinion of UFOs, ESP, poltergeists, etc? I realize that many people think these topics are laughable, but there are probably others who have experienced them (whatever they are). So what do you think is the explanation for this stuff?
Drug addicts who take drugs that affect their brains and imaginations often see things and feel things that aren't there. There's no reason to believe that other people might not have similar brain traumas that would cause them to believe that some imagining of their mind seemed to really be happening in reality to them.
The trouble is that there usually isn't a naturalistic explanation. There is typically only a smug dismissal of the witness's report as a hoax or an illusion or a hallucination - no need to investigate, move along, nothing to see here.To date, I am unaware of any phenomenon in the history of the world that was initially explained by natural processes that was later over-turned by a fantastical, non-naturalistic explanation.
I can't remember if it was the CIA or the FBI files released from the FOI act but one them hypothesized the use of simulating a UFO to infiltrate air space based on the fear of an antendant reporting the sighting due to that very same smugness and ridicule.I think the approach to take on these phenomena is the approach of a CIA analyst. You can't put the hypothesized new Russian submarine in a laboratory, and the Russians are trying to keep it secret. So you take the crummy data that you have and you work with it rather than simply ignoring it. The risk of ignoring something real is too great.
UFO’s could be lots of things. I’m not prepared to dismiss the possibility of government prototype aerial vehicles in some cases. Something is definitely flying around though. The Phoenix Lights got covered by CNN so there’s no denying that some of these are real rather than scams or hallucinations or something.What is your opinion of UFOs, ESP, poltergeists, etc? I realize that many people think these topics are laughable, but there are probably others who have experienced them (whatever they are). So what do you think is the explanation for this stuff?
I think they're generally a reminder that this world isn't all there is to things.What is your opinion of UFOs, ESP, poltergeists, etc? I realize that many people think these topics are laughable, but there are probably others who have experienced them (whatever they are). So what do you think is the explanation for this stuff?