GodLovesCats
Well-Known Member
- Mar 16, 2019
- 7,401
- 1,329
- 47
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Single
But not because it is "explicit in the constitution", but because they were trying to justify a preconception, which is what you've been doing this whole thread. You decided what was right in your eyes, and then you grasped at any straw you thought would support your bias. That's bad law for supreme court justices, it's bad law for Christians, and it's bad law for innocent babies in the womb.
Telling the extremely obvious, repeatedly proven, totally undeniable facts about what makes a human being a person with any legal rights never has been or will be grasping at straws. The only people who ever refuse to accept every female citizen's constitutional right to have an abortion in America have, without exception, been people who only care about the birghs unwanted, fatally defective, homeless babies I never saw one care about the mother and her family. I never saw one care about the dangers of crisis pregnancy centers that use their First Amendment loopholes to do what would be criminal at a non-profit organization. Anyone who says I am not a Christian because if my support for abortion rights will get the same back from me: being told you are not a Christian because you refuse to care about people after birth; only the fact that they were born alive matters to you. If this is true, you are not a "pro-lifer," but an "anti-choicer."
Last edited:
Upvote
0