JimfromOhio said:Faith do not lead because leading means working for salvation. Faith produces works which means faith is from within that produces works. My faith is not in my works.
Semantics
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
JimfromOhio said:Faith do not lead because leading means working for salvation. Faith produces works which means faith is from within that produces works. My faith is not in my works.
Isn't it Christ that leads us into good works while avoiding the "dead works". Thoughts?Faith do not lead because leading means working for salvation. Faith produces works which means faith is from within that produces works. My faith is not in my works.
ThreeAM said:Semantics
Semantic:
Function: noun plural but singular or plural in construction
1 : the study of meanings: a : the historical and psychological study and the classification of changes in the signification of words or forms viewed as factors in linguistic development b (1) : SEMIOTIC (2) : a branch of semiotic dealing with the relations between signs and what they refer to and including theories of denotation, extension, naming, and truth
2 : GENERAL SEMANTICS
3 a : the meaning or relationship of meanings of a sign or set of signs; especially : connotative meaning b : the language used (as in advertising or political propaganda) to achieve a desired effect on an audience especially through the use of words with novel or dual meanings.
LittleLambofJesus said:Isn't it Christ that leads us into good works while avoiding the "dead works". Thoughts?
Ephesians 2:10 for of Him we are workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to good works, which God did before prepare, that in them we may walk.
Hebrews 6:1 Wherefore, having left the word of the beginning of the Christ, unto the perfection we may advance, not again a foundation laying of reformation from dead works, and of faith on God,
JimfromOhio said:Ummm I am not that smart... I had to look this up.![]()
Interesting...![]()
JimfromOhio said:We have to look at the word: FAITH and this verse have been very helpful 1 Thessalonians 1:3 We continually remember before our God and Father your work produced by faith, your labor prompted by love, and your endurance inspired by hope in our Lord Jesus Christ.
There is no "lead" in that verse. There are three words and they are:
Produce
Prompted
Inspired
ThreeAM said:What Translation is that? The Greek doesn't say that.
Pro 8:20 I lead in the way of righteousness, in the midst of the paths of judgment:
Christ is righteous because He obeyed his Father's commandments.
Faith in Christ eventually leads to obedience.
JimfromOhio said:Why "eventually" leads to?Requires work of a person or refusing to acknowledge the Holy Spirit to produce works?
ThreeAM said:Our good works should improve as we mature as Christians the process of sanctification is one God of changing us over a life time.
Hbr 5:13 For every one that useth milk is unskilful in the word of righteousness: for he is a babe.
Through our union with God, we are Sanctified through living in the Holy Spirit. Our thoughts are the product of our thinking and it is not our thinking that shapes our character, but the Holy Spirit that leads our thoughts and shapes our character. A person who have the Holy Spirit in the heart will understand God's standards of "sin" because a Christian will understand God's holiness. A person without having the Holy Spirit in the heart will not understand God's holiness therefore a person will define God's definition of sin in a human point of view (rather than spirit).1 Corinthians 6:19
Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are not your own.
The heart where Jesus talks about the most. It is the heart where He meets us. The heart is the core of our being. From the heart, we love God and we love people around us. From the heart, we worship God spiritually. From the heart, we glorify God and desire to obey God. From the heart, our fruits are rooted and our fruits will grow strong. Grace is from the heart while the Law is from works.1 Peter 2:5 you also, like living stones, are being built into a spiritual house to be a holy priesthood, offering spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ.
JimfromOhio said:Regarding Sancification: James wrote about applying to sanctification with humble attitude: "God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble" (Jas 4:6, quoting Pr 3:34). God is looking for holiness. The heart is where God meets us because that is where we make our decisions. Our hearts are where our desires and motives are located.
ThreeAM said:Another great reason for not acusing a whole denomination of legalism when you realy don't understand reasons for wanting to be odeient.![]()
JimfromOhio said:A local church is one body of an universal Church with many members, ordered in such a way that, through the one Spirit, believers may be built together spiritually into a dwelling place for God. I believe there is "NO" wrong way to Glorify God since worship is spiritual from the heart. That's between God and the believer who worship.
There are different preferences of beliefs and different style of worship. Some prefer one worship style while other prefer another worship style. The key is that we must worship God in Spirit with other believers regardless our "personal" opinion or loyalty to our denominations (or non-denomination). God knows every believers' hearts and God will accept any believers who truly believe His Son. In my opinion, God do not judge us based on what denomination church we go to, but rather God judge us based on how we worship Him from our hearts.
John 4:23-24 (New International Version) Jesus said:
Yet a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth, for they are the kind of worshipers the Father seeks. God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in spirit and in truth.
The problem is that this "big picture"is relies on tunnel-vision about the ten commandments. The view depends heavily on commandments written on stone, as if Christians are (and should) still be keeping/interpreting them as the Jews did - as if we are still old covenant Jews. As if they did not fade like Paul said (2 Cor. 3:7), and most importantly: as if the new covenant of Christ is not of equal authority and greater glory.BrightCandle said:Jim,
To put this into perspective, lets look at the big picture and the point of this topic, namely, that the majority of Christian churches profess to honor and keep the Ten Commandments, except the 4th Commandment, the Sabbath commandment, which they choose to single out alter to fit their own preferences with no command from God to do so. SDAs put forth the idea, that fallible mortals should not even think or try to make God's Holy Law fit their preferences, or to make it conform to church traditions, but instead do just as Jesus said to do, when He wrote the Ten Commandments in stone with His own finger, thousands of years ago. If it is a sin to break any of the other nine commandments in our day and age, why would it not be a sin to break number four of the ten? As you well know, almost all of the heavy hitters of the evangelical churches in the USA are promoting on 05.07.06 a Ten Commandments day celebration, and saying that they were made for "all mankind", and yet 99.9% of these same Chrisitan leaders are not keeping the 4th Commandment? Doesn't that seem inconsistent and disengenous to you?
BrightCandle said:Jim,
To put this into perspective, lets look at the big picture and the point of this topic, namely, that the majority of Christian churches profess to honor and keep the Ten Commandments, except the 4th Commandment, the Sabbath commandment, which they choose to single out alter to fit their own preferences with no command from God to do so. SDAs put forth the idea, that fallible mortals should not even think or try to make God's Holy Law fit their preferences, or to make it conform to church traditions, but instead do just as Jesus said to do, when He wrote the Ten Commandments in stone with His own finger, thousands of years ago. If it is a sin to break any of the other nine commandments in our day and age, why would it not be a sin to break number four of the ten? As you well know, almost all of the heavy hitters of the evangelical churches in the USA are promoting on 05.07.06 a Ten Commandments day celebration, and saying that they were made for "all mankind", and yet 99.9% of these same Chrisitan leaders are not keeping the 4th Commandment? Doesn't that seem inconsistent and disengenous to you?
Nightfire said:...You are also working with the assumption that "keeping" a commandment has some universal meaning that everybody can understand without qualification. If that were true, then Jesus did indeed not "keep" the commandments, as the Jews accused him of doing. But we know He did, and so we must rely on Him to know (and teach us) what keeping God's commandments really means - not Jewish tradition, no matter how long it was practiced before or after Christ. Christians (under Paul and the apostle's leadership - and not least of all: under supervision of the Spirit that Jesus promised the church) began underplaying the sabbath as a ceremonial day, and emphasizing resurrection day from the moment they realized the significance of what happened....
So we must see Dr. Bacchiocchi as ringleader of the sabbatarians? Having a PhD doesn't make him infallible nor his conclusions final, as you would be quick to point out about the Sunday-beliefs of scholars with PhDs who believe the evidence shows the contrary. Do you accept the qualifications of those who passed Dr. Bacchiocchi with Cum Laude at the Georgian Pontifical University in Rome? They weren't sabbath keepers, were they?ThreeAM said:Acts 24:5 For we have found this man [a] pestilent [fellow], and a mover of sedition among all the Jews throughout the world, and a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes:
Acts 24:14 But this I confess unto thee, that after the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the law and in the prophets:
The early Christians in Jerusalem were called Nazarenes. Paul was accused as being a "ringleader" of the Nazarenes. Paul said he did in fact believe as the Nazarenes believed.
The Nazarenes who had been taught by Paul fled Jerusalem just prior to the Roman siege of Jerusalem in 70AD having fled to the mountian town of Pella.
The Nazarenes are recorded by Eppiphanius around the year 350AD to still faithfully worship on the 7th Day Sabbath.
You can find Sam Bacchiocchi's Phd [early church history] book "From Sabbath to Sunday" for free online He mentions the Nazarenes and quotes from Epiphanius' book. http://english.sdaglobal.org/dnl/bacchi/books/sab2sun.pdf Dr. Bacchiocchi's book is one of the most complete books on just how the change from the sabbath to sunday came about in the early church. Dr.Bacchiocchi graduated Summa Cum Laude from the Georgian Pontifical University in Rome having the destinction of being the first protestant to graduate from the university in its 450 year history.
BrightCandle said:Jim,
To put this into perspective, lets look at the big picture and the point of this topic, namely, that the majority of Christian churches profess to honor and keep the Ten Commandments, except the 4th Commandment, the Sabbath commandment, which they choose to single out alter to fit their own preferences with no command from God to do so. SDAs put forth the idea, that fallible mortals should not even think or try to make God's Holy Law fit their preferences, or to make it conform to church traditions, but instead do just as Jesus said to do, when He wrote the Ten Commandments in stone with His own finger, thousands of years ago. If it is a sin to break any of the other nine commandments in our day and age, why would it not be a sin to break number four of the ten? As you well know, almost all of the heavy hitters of the evangelical churches in the USA are promoting on 05.07.06 a Ten Commandments day celebration, and saying that they were made for "all mankind", and yet 99.9% of these same Chrisitan leaders are not keeping the 4th Commandment? Doesn't that seem inconsistent and disengenous to you?