But please do wait one moment before I respond back to this latest post of yours. I need to completely address the post in question in your opening remark within the thread as I am certain that you will not deal with my replies on the basis of merit, but rather that you will appeal to conjectures outside of the focal point of concern that I am presenting as a consequence to the 70AD Full Preterist narrative.
When Jesus declares the end will come, he is preempting the discussion in that he is foretelling his very reign to the end as people are being made disciples for him under the new covenant temple construct. As he stated the Harvest is plentiful but the workers are few. This end Jesus speaks off is not the Old Covenant Temple construct whereby its fruits were made null and void post Cross of Christ. The Old Covenant Temple was the symbol of the drying up of the Fig tree when Jesus rode in on a colt (New Covenant Church) and had abandoned the mother donkey that symbolised the Old Covenant Church. Therefore as far as God is concerned only one Temple Sacrifice construct existed for 40 years leading up to 70AD.
Facts are that there were no Old Covenant fruits post-Pentecost and that the New Temple made obsolete the Old Temple in that it was spiritually destroyed 40 years before the Romans burned it down because God rejected their oblations and sacrifices within it. The Discipleship that Jesus was alluding to was within the New Temple Context as he had highlighted to the Samaritan Woman at The Well where he said no longer will believers look towards the Temple in Jerusalem to Worship God for God only approves worship under the New Temple Construct.
John is instructed for the second time to preach yet again to the many Gentile nations after the fact of 70AD, in fact, decades after.
14And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and
then the end will come.
15“So when you see standing in the holy place ‘the abomination that causes desolation,’ spoken of through the prophet Daniel—let the reader understand—
The Abomination of Desolation must, therefore, be in context to the New Temple construct and not the Old as disciples post-Pentecost are being made under the New Temple construct. The end spoken off is in regards to the New Temple and not the Old and this is the big difference why the Abomination that is brought into the Temple in the Last Days is within the Temple of the Holy Spirit.
The end must encompass the entire New Covenant from the Cross until Christ reigns and accomplishes what he set out to do through his Cross by accounting for all who are to be written in the Book of Life, then as Paul states Jesus will become the subject of the Father and that God will be ALL in ALL, the End.
Jesus is alluding to the end as the full complement of disciples are enlisted for him within the Book of Life and that is being done within the New Temple Construct and so he will continue to reign until he defeats the last enemy death and when he does he then can claim mission accomplished by now being made subject to the Father as Paul states
Then the end will come, when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father after he has destroyed all dominion, authority and power. 25For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. 26The last enemy to be destroyed is death.
Obviously when John is instructed to preach yet again to the many Gentile nations, it would only be conducive to do so when the near and present threat of war leading up to 70AD and decades after the fact has all but diminished and then he would time his instruction to the Apostolic heads to come out of hiding and to continue their mission yet again.
This is not happening when all hell is breaking out from 68 to 75 AD as this 7-year war has people running for their lives and dying in numbers and is not conducive to hearing any good news and what good news might be good news during this time?
It is obvious that the book of Revelation and the letters sent to the heads of the 7 Churches in Asia Minor were sent many decades after the fact when all is settled and factional fighting has all but ended giving way for trade and with the trading merchants the missionaries who accompanied them on the routes to China and India and Mongolia (Russia). You see the world pre 80/90 AD did not encompass the East and hence it did not encompass the whole world as the Full Preterists false presupposition to their 70 AD narrative is exposed as dubious at beas.
The Resurrection of the Dead
The symbol of the two witnesses must point to the entire New Covenant Great Harvest within the New Temple Construct, that is the 3.5 days and in making disciples for Christ. When this Temple starts to bring in abominations, then this points to the end where Satan comes out for the final time before the final Judgement of the Dead to deceive the nations in the Batlle of Gog and Magog and this spiritual battle is the death of the Church's commission and yet we are told she finishes her testimony in time before the beast of the bottomless Pitt takes her out of the way.
Since we can see that the Church's Commission was being restarted by John and it is highly unlikely that Satan halted the Commission, yet we are told on the contrary the woman was given the wings of an eagle to spread the gospel far and wide to new lands and continents that opened up for her in the East like Russia (Mongolia), China and India.
The consequence of the Full Preterist 70 AD narrative where the end is placed is that it removes the power of the Cross, removes the power of the Holy Spirit, denies that Jesus continues to reign today, does not necessitate the preaching of the Gospel, reports that Satan no longer can cause people to spiritually die, removes the hope in a bodily resurrection, removes the Commission of the Church, Jesus is now the subject of the Father, the books are opened and the Final Judgement is past.
So what sort of faith does one appeal to when Full Preterist 70AD narrative removes the above hope in Christ, but by no stretch the complete list?
The 70AD narrative is the enemy of the Gospel of Jesus Christ and has no historicity to how the Gospel has been spreading for the last 1900 years. In fact, the 70 AD narrative purpose is to destroy the faith and make null and void the Commission of the Holy Spirit by declaring that we are living in Christ's never-ending New Covenant Age Millenium Reign and this my friends cannot be further away from the truth.