aiki
Regular Member
I am skeptical that hell is real, but the fact that it might be real is what worries me. There is too much on the line to be wrong here. I think my heightened belief in it is from where I grew up in a Christian home.
Interesting. And conflicted. Are you saying that what skepticism you've adopted concerning hell is weak?
Paul was allowed a lot more evidence than we have now, so there wasn't any "magic" involved in his belief when compared to ours. (I'm referring to his direct experience with God.)
But you can have a direct experience of God yourself. I do every day. So do millions of other followers of Christ.
I think everything has a truth and sure way of being (contrary to relativism), but there's no good way to choose an expert or side on any matter.
But you see the issue isn't just one of evidence and argument. If God really exists and wants to relate with us as the Bible says, then we can know Him personally, quite apart from any philosophical arguments or empirical evidence in favour of His existence. What you really need is for God to reveal Himself to you as He promises He will do to all who search for Him and draw near to Him with their whole heart. This is the quickest, surest way I know of to cut through all the controversy and debate about God and get to the truth of Him.
You mentioned that the supernatural occurrence has already happened, and it was in the resurrection of Christ. The idea to study the historicity of Christ's resurrection is very attractive to me now, and I could see myself getting very involved with it, but I know when I feel I am finished, there'll be some sort of doubt that I missed some piece of its puzzle or didn't read the totality of what is available...not sure how to escape that. I do also know that some in history (such as Schweitzer) looked at the historical evidence and came away not believing in the resurrection.
If you've already determined to doubt regardless of the evidence for the resurrection you may encounter, I can't say that you're really being honest about how you're approaching the evidence. In any case, if you do want to investigate, here is a place online to check out:
www.coldcasechristianity.com
In the past, I do somewhat remember noticing lots of weird "coincidences" when I was trying to follow Jesus. How do I know my mind wasn't playing tricks on me and causing me to notice what I was already biased to? If we begin to look for some awareness in daily life, we have a far higher chance of finding it than if we weren't looking. Isn't this a byproduct of merely increasing our attention and being more sensitive/present?
Is that what you think is going on in the story I told you of God's providential care of my brother? I don't.
Some here believe that it's God job to bring us to him - not the other way around. Of course, there are verses that support both sides.
Really? I know my Bible pretty well and it no where indicates that we come to God apart from His drawing work in us. Ephesians 2:1 describes all those who are not saved as "dead in trespasses and sins." How can a dead man make any move toward anything? He can't; he's dead. Likewise, those who are spiritually dead cannot make any move toward God. They can't; they're dead.
There are a lot of (seemingly?) contradictory verses. I've no idea how a layman is supposed to sort through these issues.
A layperson is not by virtue of their being a layperson exempted from careful and prolonged study of God's word. There is no shortcut to understanding God's truth. The layperson is to be as rigorous as possible in their scrutiny of the Bible and as they are, God leads them into His truth.
And why does a layman even have to come to textual experts for help? The Gospel is supposed to be easy enough for a child to understand.
Why wouldn't you take advantage of the work already done by textual experts as much as possible? Do you have the time and finances to make Bible study your vocation? If not, then you might do well to apply to those who have had the wherewithal to be professional students of God's word for some help in understanding it.
The Gospel is easy enough for a child to understand, yes, but it is also deep enough to provoke a lifetime of study and analysis. This is one of the many remarkable things about Gods' truth. The Bible contains both "milk" for babies and meat for those who are "of full age."
Last edited:
Upvote
0