Adam ?

[Colter]

You mean believing HIS WORD and PROMISE justifies us and that our faith in HIM as savior and lord will bear fruit to HIS GLORY?
Or do you mean that those who believe in
HIS SACRIFICE take the gift of GOD's mercy and grace as a free license to sin

which is what some accuse us of

Do we have to exalt our works as proof of our salvation before the eyes of men?

In the original gospel, salvation was by faith and the responsibility that comes with sonship with God, living a decided life, a whole souled commitment to seek and do the will of God in the totality of life here and hereafter.

* Having shed the yoke of bondage to traditionalism, fasting and sacrifices, recognition of the saving truth that all men and women of the earth are in fact children of the living God, this "good news" produces a joy that becomes infectious to those around us.


"If religion is an opiate to the people, it is not the religion of Jesus."

 

[miknik5]

In the original gospel, salvation was by faith and the responsibility that comes with sonship with God, living a decided life, a whole souled commitment to seek and do the will of God in the totality of life here and hereafter.

* Having shed the yoke of bondage to traditionalism, fasting and sacrifices, recognition of the saving truth that all men and women of the earth are in fact children of the living God, this "good news" produces a joy that becomes infectious to those around us.


"If religion is an opiate to the people, it is not the religion of Jesus."

So do you think by what you do you can baptize men into HIS BODY?

 

[miknik5]

The WILL of GOD (along with the WORK of GOD) are clearly stated to all men in John 6

The very chapter where HE tells men to eat of HIM

Can you feed HIS lambs more food than what TRULY FEEDS and continues to FEED..daily?

If indeed it comes by and through and in HIM

 

[miknik5]

And if you were satisfied by THE FOOD which comes from GOD, why did you need to eat "from another table food from men?"

 

[Colter]

So do you think by what you do you can baptize men into HIS BODY?

No, we can lead a horse to water but we cant make him drink.....we can make them thirsty but the change of heart has to come from within.

 

[Colter]

The WILL of GOD (along with the WORK of GOD) are clearly stated to all men in John 6

The very chapter where HE tells men to eat of HIM

Can you feed HIS lambs more food than what TRULY FEEDS and continues to FEED..daily?

If indeed it comes by and through and in HIM

Jesus and the truth he taught is indeed the bread of life.

 

[Colter]

And if you were satisfied by THE FOOD which comes from GOD, why did you need to eat "from another table food from men?"

Revelation from God and the Gospel of salvation are two separate things. Its you who tells God he doesn't have any more to say.

 

[miknik5]

I think you might agree with Paul's letters but overlook the more important foundational truth of who those letters were addressed to

 

[miknik5]

Jesus and the truth he taught is indeed the bread of life.

Jesus is THE BREAD of LIFE
He who has THE SON has LIFE

 

[miknik5]

Revelation from God and the Gospel of salvation are two separate things. Its you who tells God he doesn't have any more to say.

No

Would you say the beginning declaration of the book of revelation was an error

Would you say Isaiah 8 is an error
Would you say CHRIST saying that these are what testify of HIM is an error?

Would you say that the TESTIMINY of JESUS is

THE SPIRIT
of prophecy

And that it is only IN CHRIST that the veil is removed for us to even see GOD's GLORY in THE FACE of JESUS CHRIST

How do you think HE came to show us THE FATHER

 

[miknik5]

How many advocates did you think there were who teach and lead us to ALL TRUTH?

 

[Colter]

You are speaking of the Gospel which the Jewish people rejected when they crucified Christ. Many STILL teach this Gospel which says to believe, be baptized and walk in newness of life. That is NOT the Gospel of Jesus Christ since His Gospel was given to Paul in Heaven l Cor 15:1-4 by Jesus, Himself. The Kingdom did not come because Jesus was rejected and Crucified by His own. That is WHY we have a New Testament. Amen?

Thanks again Adam777, she would rather avoid the obvious truth by wondering off into an unnecessarily complex philosophical discussion.

 

[Aseyesee]

Through the process of time we come to understand that there is no place God is not ... and through the ending of it we find this to be the reality in us, a reality we are in.

 

[miknik5]

Thanks again Adam777, she would rather avoid the obvious truth by wondering off into an unnecessarily complex philosophical discussion.

What unnecessary truth?

That you are not THE LORD and MASTER over HIS BODY


And that HE alone will judge HIS SERVANT?

 

[Colter]

 

[miknik5]

View attachment 197412

And yet it's THE TRUTH

 

[miknik5]

Let that ref stand up on that day and say that

 

[Colter]

And yet it's THE TRUTH

"
Aman777 said: ↑
"You are speaking of the Gospel which the Jewish people rejected when they crucified Christ. Many STILL teach this Gospel which says to believe, be baptized and walk in newness of life. That is NOT the Gospel of Jesus Christ since His Gospel was given to Paul in Heaven l Cor 15:1-4 by Jesus, Himself. The Kingdom did not come because Jesus was rejected and Crucified by His own. That is WHY we have a New Testament. Amen?"

 

[PeaceJoyLove]

Through the process of time we come to understand that there is no place God is not ... and through the ending of it we find this to be the reality in us.

Oh yes!! ...no place God is not. To truly SEE that is LIFE changing...to find this our reality, IN us, the hope of our faith coming to pass is glorious.

 

[Aman777]

NO.
You are making some very huge misinterpretations in your reading. When one reads Scripture it is best to begin as a beginner should and read literal to get the overall understanding. Somethings are so obviously symbolic that it's hard to miss. Read again and do more noticing of the symbolic...the Holy Spirit will bless that effort I believe and teach you.

You are confusing the first man Adam was formed of the dust and then God breathed into him the breath of life...that is to say Adam was given a spirit/soul. That's all I can imagine you are getting your theory from. If it is Genesis 5:1-2 that you are forming all this theory off of I sadly say you are quite confused yet. Humble yourself and read for understanding from God and pray over it as you read. Don't rush into a new theory.

I'm not rushing at all and my views AGREE in every way with every discovery of Science and History. Do your's?

Can you tell us WHO the second Adam was?