Poll shows Biden viewed as too old to ‘effectively serve’ another term

[Belk]

Both. I voted for Clinton for his first term. Man was I duped!

Many were, on both sides.

 

[FenderTL5]

In ineffective Biden is a far better world than an effective Trump.

 

[HARK!]

He is. I was really hoping for two different candidates. Nikki Haley vs Pete Buttigieg would of been interesting.

Oh well, maybe the Democrats can come up with something better than Biden; but I doubt it. Look at what they're doing to Kennedy.; but it is fun to watch them eat their own.

 

[HARK!]

In ineffective Biden is a far better world than an effective Trump.

At starting a nuclear war?

 

[JustOneWay]

As this Administration is setting us on the fast track for WWIII; I seriously question Biden's continued ability to perform as CiC.

WWIII?

Fear is the great motivator, and who would vote for anybody who is fast tracking the next world war?

 

[FenderTL5]

At starting a nuclear war?

Sure, whatever. If you think that's better.

 

[HARK!]

Many were, on both sides.

Both sides of what?

 

[JustOneWay]

At starting a nuclear war?

Now it's a nuclear war!

Now you have me thinking of voting for trump, regardless of convictions.

Biden just went from 'too old' to now 'fast tracking the nuclear war'.

 

[Yttrium]

I bet 99% of us here would vote our normal party preference no matter what.

I don't really think that 99% of us here have a normal party. I certainly don't.

 

[HARK!]

Fear is the great motivator,

To inhibit clear thinking?

 

[Belk]

Both sides of what?

The political divide. Many very liberal voters found his sudden move to the center on items like gay rights off putting.

 

[Tinker Grey]

He is. I was really hoping for two different candidates. Nikki Haley vs Pete Buttigieg would of been interesting.

Every time I hear Pete, I'm impressed with how well-spoken he is. Those two would be a real race with real choices.

 

[JustOneWay]

To inhibit clear thinking?

I don't fear, nor believe WWIII is coming and Biden is not fast-tracking WWIII.

 

[HARK!]

Sure, whatever. If you think that's better.

That would make a catchy campaign slogan,

Maybe you should make up some bumper stickers.

TAKE A NUKE FOR BIDEN

 

[HARK!]

I don't fear, nor believe WWIII is coming and Biden is not fast-tracking WWIII.

You might want read the news, not the controlled narrative of the MSM.

 

[JustOneWay]

You might want read the news, not the controlled narrative of the MSM.

LOL.

 

[iluvatar5150]

He is. I was really hoping for two different candidates. Nikki Haley vs Pete Buttigieg would of been interesting.

I like Pete, but I think he needs more time in DC to build his popularity and political machine. Maybe another term as a cabinet secretary or chief of staff, then Senator or VP, though I question his ability to win a statewide vote in Indiana.

 

[Servus]

I'd say that particular individual has gotten too old.

 

[FireDragon76]

It is ageist to arbitrarily exclude people due to age. The cognitive declines associated with aging are by no means uniform.

 

[MotoToTheMax]

It is ageist to arbitrarily exclude people due to age. The cognitive declines associated with aging are by no means uniform.

Well then consider me ageist in the same sense I'm not going to support 8 year olds getting driver's licenses.
Another analogy is I'm a proud species-ist in that I'll always put human lives over non-human lives.

The only benefit for Biden is that I'm voting for 1 old person I think is less bad than another old person (Trump).
If it came down to Ramaswamy and Biden , I'd still vote for Biden through policy alone.
Haley vs. Biden would give me pause and I could see myself going for Haley but I'm not sure yet.