Joe Biden’s denials shift as evidence piles up about his involvement in Hunter’s deals

[essentialsaltes]

Enough to consider impeachment.

No evidence is required for impeachment. It's a political solution, not necessarily an evidence-based solution.

 

[Pommer]

Enough to consider impeachment.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, California Republican, is considering an impeachment inquiry to investigate the president’s culpability in deals that netted millions of dollars for Hunter Biden, the president’s brother James Biden, and several other members of the Biden clan.

White House hedges bets on whether Hunter Biden special counsel will implicate president

The White House declined to say Monday that special counsel David Weiss definitely will not uncover any links between President Biden and his son Hunter’s questionable business dealings.

www.washingtontimes.com

It’s like a thirties radio serial, “tune in next week kids when ‘the evidence’ shows up, for sure, this time!”

 

[Pommer]

LOL! They;re considering it because they do have evidence. If you choose to ignore the evidence; that doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. There's plenty of on Hunter's laptop alone.

The criminal proceeding that “the laptop” might initiate, probably isn’t the one that you’re thinking about.

 

[HARK!]

It’s like a thirties radio serial, “tune in next week kids when ‘the evidence’ shows up, for sure, this time!”

For those who have been paying attention, the evidence is building.

 

[NxNW]

LOL! They;re considering it because they do have evidence. If you choose to ignore the evidence; that doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. There's plenty of on Hunter's laptop alone.

LOL, You can't even establish the existence of this alleged laptop. If they had evidence, they'd do more than just consider.

You're off topic.

Not at all; just an explanation of how things work when you actually have evidence.

Let me know when they actually have evidence against Biden to do more than "consider".

 

[HARK!]

LOL, You can't even establish the existence of this alleged laptop.

The FBI has documented and proclaimed that the laptop exists. The emails and pictures on that laptop have been posted online for all to see.

 

[HARK!]

If they had evidence, they'd do more than just consider.

Stay tuned.

 

[NxNW]

The FBI has documented and proclaimed that the laptop exists.

No they haven't.

The emails and pictures on that laptop have been posted online for all to see.

The source(s) of this information, some stolen, some fabricated, are as yet undetermined.

 

[NxNW]

Stay tuned.

I'm always in tune. I'm just waiting for the GOP to figure out what key they're in.

 

[HARK!]

No they haven't.

Ignoring the facts doesn't change the facts.

The source(s) of this information, some stolen, some fabricated, are as yet undetermined.

Get real.

 

[NxNW]

Ignoring the facts doesn't change the facts.

If it was a fact, you could prove it.

Get real.

See above.

 

[HARK!]

If it was a fact, you could prove it.

For those whom are in denial, there will never be sufficient proof.

 

[SimplyMe]

For those whom are in denial, there will never be sufficient proof.

That definitely does seem to be the case with Donald Trump's supporters.

 

[KCfromNC]

I, and other members, have been posting the evidence in this forum for quite some time.

I'm not convinced. I've seen lots of posts claims by various GOP legislators, but when asked for actual evidence, we end up with attempts to poison the well through distractions about the people who can see that random claims by unreliable sources isn't evidence. For example :

If you're actually interested in reviewing the evidence; you might look into it. Many just choose to ignore the evidence.

Personal attacks and goading in place of actual links to evidence are pretty telling. People are catching on to how empty this rhetoric is.

 

[KCfromNC]

For those whom are in denial, there will never be sufficient proof.

Or more on topic to this thread, for those who think evidence is more than GOP legislators claiming they believe something there currently isn't sufficient evidence. Or for that matter, any real evidence.

 

[NxNW]

It's funny when Comer goes on TV saying his vague accusations and the hosts ask him for the evidence and he says all will be revealed later.

Ok, it's later. Any evidence yet?

 

[NxNW]

Stay tuned.

I'm tuned, any evidence yet?

 

[Pommer]

Ok, it's later. Any evidence yet?

Right after the Trump Healthcare Infrastructure bill is released.

 

[NxNW]

Stay tuned.

After 6 weeks I'm still tuned in. Have we seen any evidence yet?

 

[The Barbarian]

One need not be a public official in order to lobby.

So you want to arrest people for lobbying? Or are you planning on having them impeached? How do you impeach a citizen who doesn't hold public office?