• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Judas was saved and then lost his salvation

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,731
USA
✟184,857.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
3. Jesus gave all HIS twelve disciples power, (Judas was included included) there is no way out of the clarity of this fact from the text.,

4. Judas was an apostle,

5. Judas was sent forth and ordained,
6. nothing listed
7. Jesus called Judas one of his sheep! THIS IS A BIG POINT!!

re read my first post that would help here. But these things

1. Judas Belonged to the Father before given to Jesus (John 17:6 KJV)
2. Judas was a disciple of Jesus at the beginning ( Matthew 10:1-)
3. Judas was an apostle ( Matthew 10)
4. Judas was a a sheep sent to the lost sheep (Matthew 10)
5. Judas was given power to cast out devils, raise the dead heal the sick ( and satan cannot cast put Satan as Jesus said) (Matthew 10)
6. Judas had the peace of God to give (Matthew 10)
7. Judas was a familiar friend of Jesus whom he once trusted (Psalm 41:9, John 13:8 KJV)
8. Judas had the Spirit of the Father speaking in him when needed (Matthew 10 KJV
9. Judas was written in the book of life once (Psalms 69:25,28 KJV)
10. Judas fell by transgression, and was blotted out (Psalm 69 with Acts 1:16-20, 25 KJV)
Sorry, but none of this proves that Judas ever believed.

In fact, #1 is an error. By the time we get to ch 17, Satan had entered Judas and left.
#2 is irrelevant. John 6 notes many disciples who did not believe
#3 is irrelevant.
#4 was a comparison only; not believers vs unbelievers, as you suppose.
#5 no evidence that Judas actually did any of these things.
#6 see #5
#7 if true, then Jesus wasn't God, and wasn't omniscient. Jesus ALWAYS knew Judas would fulfill the Father's plan.
#8 this is not stated specifically. It was said of the group in general.
#9 say what?? Have you read the Psa? It was written by David, regarding his enemies. And v.28 doesn't say anything about Judas at all. So what was David saying? It shows that the "book of life" contains every human in history, and when they die, their name is blotted out if they never received eternal life.

But, go ahead and prove otherwise.

#10 is speculative.

Jesus also said to the 12

"67 Then said Jesus unto the twelve, Will ye also go away?" (John 6:67 KJV) showing the possibility of doing such a thing. Jesus gave them a choice.

Of course He did. But when you compare v.64 with v.70 and 71, we see that v.64 includes the betrayer with unbelieving disciples.

The prodigal was found in the house and lost out of it. He was alive in the house and dead out of it and alive again when he came back into it.
Not at all. The son remained the son throughout the parable. The ONLY THING that was lost was fellowship between father and son. One has to speculate to make the leap that he was somehow "dead" after leaving the house. He sure wasn't physically dead. And it's just a huge leap of presumption that a father (remember that a parable was a human story) would consider a son to be "spiritually dead" based on behavior.

Much more reasonable is the father was speaking of lost fellowship (intimacy) with his son. That's what died.

btw, I learned from someone who studied 1st Century Jewish life/customs. What the prodigal did was tantamount to telling his father that he wished he were dead when he asked for his share. Because at that time, the inheritance was divided only after the father died. So asking for it while the father was alive was the height of antagonism against the father. Such behavior would have been seen by every Jew at that time to be extremely offensive. I wasn't aware of that before.

So, here's what the parable was about, in order:
getting out of fellowship, coming to one's senses, confession, repentance, grace, and restoration of fellowship.

Regardless of how one views the parable, this order cannot be denied.

If you don't see this parable as a deep spiritual truth of How the Father God seeks the lost then I don;t know what to say.
I see it exactly as I've listed above.

Feel free to show me that this order doesn't occur in the parable. And I'll respond by showing EXACTLY that they do exist in that order.

That parable is actually three parables.
Well, it's just one, regardless of your claim. It's about a father and 2 sons, and the grace and forgiveness of the father towards his sons.
 
Upvote 0

LoveofTruth

Christ builds His church from within us
Jun 29, 2015
6,845
1,794
✟211,930.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Sorry, but none of this proves that Judas ever believed.

Yes it does and it seems very clear to the unbiased reader. If Judas belonged to Jesus and the father before he met Jesus in the flesh and he was called an apostle and given that gift and he was called a "sheep" by Jesus and sent to the LOST sheep. It seems clear.

In fact, #1 is an error. By the time we get to ch 17, Satan had entered Judas and left.

In fact, there is no error in number 1

I said in #1

"1. Judas Belonged to the Father before given to Jesus (John 17:6 KJV)"

It is very obvious that Jesus is speaking of a past event, of his working with his apostles in that chapter as we read

"6 I have manifested thy name unto the men which thou gavest me out of the world: [these 12 apostles were given to Jesus from the father. In matthew 10 we see that Jesus called unto him "HIS" 12, which he was given]thine they were, [this is past tense, he did not say thine they are in the present but thine they were. This is clear and then the Father gave them to Jesus] and thou gavest them me; and they have kept thy word....12 While I was with them [past tense again speaking of his time from the beginning until now] in the world, I kept them in thy name: those that thou gavest me [Judas was one of those given as Matthew 10 shows] I have kept, and none of them is lost, but the son of perdition; [Judas became lost from the 12 and as we read in Acts 1 he fell by transgression. He had part of the ministry and was numbered among them and an apostle] that the scripture might be fulfilled."(John 17:6,12 KJV)


#2 is irrelevant. John 6 notes many disciples who did not believe

Point 2 is

2. Judas was a disciple of Jesus at the beginning ( Matthew 10:1-)

It is not irrelevant. It is a vital aspect in seeing that Judas and the other 11 were all belonging to Jesus and he ordained the 12 ( Judas included) and sent all 12 forth as sheep to the lost sheep.

as it is written

"And when he had called unto him his twelve disciples, he gave them [all 12 Judas included] power against unclean spirits, to cast them out, and to heal all manner of sickness and all manner of disease.2 Now the names of the twelve apostles are these..."( Matthew 10:1,2 KJV)

You need to address this fact. Jesus called "HIS" twelve (Judas included). It does not say he called his eleven and one devil that was not his. So far I have never heard any deal with this text directly to refute it. Yes, like you many try to run all over the place. But here it is clear. And if Judas was always a devil, how can he have power given to cast out devils and how can he fall by transgression if he was already fallen all along?


#3 is irrelevant.

No it is not irrelevant. It clearly exposes your understanding as wrong. I said in point 3

"3. Judas was an apostle"

An apostle is a sent one of God. It is a gift from God. Judas was an apostle and fell by transgression. He obtained part of the ministry as the others did (Acts 1) and he was given power to cast out devils heal and preach and have the Spirit of the father speaking in him when needed (Matthew 10).

He was also an apostle of Jesus. This is significant. Later on he fell away and had Satan enter him and he betrayed Jesus with a kiss.

#7 if true, then Jesus wasn't God, and wasn't omniscient. Jesus ALWAYS knew Judas would fulfill the Father's plan.

I quoted the verse that shows Judas was a familiar friend of Jesus whom he once trusted and that he lifted up his heel against him. Judas betrayed Jesus. To betray he had to once have the trust and believe. Or else what is he betraying, all the world that hates Jesus would be in the same place. No, betrayal is a specific and distinct aspect.

This is not what you say here. Jesus obviously can walk with men as they were with him in faith. He will not leave and forsake them if they abide in faith. But if they have an evil heart of unbelief and depart from him and forsake him and deny him. he will leave. This shows that He can know the end of a person, but the time he walks with them is still given and they all have a chance .

#8 this is not stated specifically. It was said of the group in general.

No Jesus is still speaking to the 12 he sent forth. You are trying to make the text fit your theory. Jesus was speaking to the twelve he sent forth and said the Spirit of the Father would speak in them when needed. Judas also was a partaker of the ministry. This aspect would be involved as well in being a partaker and of his obtaining part of the ministry.

#9 say what?? Have you read the Psa? It was written by David, regarding his enemies. And v.28 doesn't say anything about Judas at all. So what was David saying? It shows that the "book of life" contains every human in history, and when they die, their name is blotted out if they never received eternal life.

No. In the chapter it is quoted about Judas in Acts and it refers to this Psalm. Notice that those in the book of life are only the righteous saints. Not all men in the world. "And not be written with the righteous"

#10 is speculative.

This is not speculative at all. It is directly stated

"25 That he may take part of this ministry and apostleship, from which Judas by transgression fell, that he might go to his own place."(Acts 1:25 KJV)


Of course He did. But when you compare v.64 with v.70 and 71, we see that v.64 includes the betrayer with unbelieving disciples.

Jesus separates the two by saying those who believe not "AND" who should betray him and was speaking of Judas who "SHOULD" betray him. To betray you have to had once had the trust of the person and believed as Judas did. Yes in Judas case he had to believe to betray Jesus. And a person can believe for a while then in the time of temptation believe not and have an evil heart of unbelief and depart from God. So to say those who believed not, can show a certain point in time, or that they never believed. Both can be applicable.

as scripture shows

"11 Now the parable is this: The seed is the word of God. 12 Those by the way side are they that hear; then cometh the devil, and taketh away the word out of their hearts, lest they should believe and be saved. 13 They on the rock are they, which, when they hear, receive the word with joy; and these have no root, which for a while believe, [showing that they were saved as vs 11 speaks of] and in time of temptation fall away...."(LUke 8:11-13 KJV)

There are so many verses that show a person can fall away from salvation and be lost forever. But I am sticking with the Judas discussion for the most part. It is a very strong section. And it often troubles many who have been taught the wrong teaching of OSAS.
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,731
USA
✟184,857.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Yes it does and it seems very clear to the unbiased reader.
Thats my answer to you as well. Considering John 6:64 with 70,71 and John 13, it is clear that Judas was never a believer.

If Judas belonged to Jesus and the father before he met Jesus in the flesh and he was called an apostle and given that gift and he was called a "sheep" by Jesus and sent to the LOST sheep. It seems clear.
Your seam has come apart. :)

I tire of this discussion. What Jesus said in John 10:28 means that Judas cannot have ever been saved. If he had been, his ending up in hell would mean that Jesus was in error in His statement.

I will NEVER believe such a thing.

If Judas believed, he would have received eternal life from Jesus.

If he received eternal life, Jesus said he would never perish.

But he perished.

How is any of this not clear?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Danthemailman
Upvote 0

LoveofTruth

Christ builds His church from within us
Jun 29, 2015
6,845
1,794
✟211,930.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I will NEVER believe such a thing.
I tire of your rejection of the truth

You seem to be saying that you believe what you believe don’t bother you with the facts

It is clear Judas belonged to Jesus at one time and so was a sheep then at a certain point in time he betrayed Jesus

And eternal life is Jesus Christ and when men abide in him then they have eternal life and if they abide not they can be cut off and fall away and be cast into the fire

These things are clear in scripture

I notice you avoided much of my argument from scripture
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,731
USA
✟184,857.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I tire of your rejection of the truth
You've shown nothing of the sort about my rejecction of truth.

You seem to be saying that you believe what you believe don’t bother you with the facts
No, it seems you're incapable of grasping my posts.

It is clear Judas belonged to Jesus at one time and so was a sheep then at a certain point in time he betrayed Jesus
Here's the bottom line for you. If Judas was EVER saved, then what Jesus stated in John 10:28 CANNOT be true. So that's what you ARE arguing for; that Jesus was WRONG in what He said in that verse.

I'm NOT the one rejecting truth. But you certainly are.

And eternal life is Jesus Christ and when men abide in him then they have eternal life and if they abide not they can be cut off and fall away and be cast into the fire
I see that you have no idea what "abiding" even means.

These things are clear in scripture
I believe they are, but I see many people who don't see so clearly.

I notice you avoided much of my argument from scripture
Really? What have I avoided? I make a point to address the points made in posts one at a time.

So please tell me what I've avoided. I really want to know, so I'll be sure to address whatever it is that you think I am avoiding.
 
Upvote 0

LoveofTruth

Christ builds His church from within us
Jun 29, 2015
6,845
1,794
✟211,930.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I see that you have no idea what "abiding" is .

Yes I do and I have spoke about it many times

It means

“a primary verb; to stay (in a given place, state, relation or expectancy):--abide, continue, dwell, endure, be present, remain, stand, tarry (for), X thine own.”

As I have said

And the abiding is to be in Christ and he in us if a man dies not abide (remain, continue, dwell endure to the end) then he is cast forth as a branch no longer in Christ and withered dried up with no life flowing through him

These things are very clear as Jesus told us.

John 15 - 4. Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye, except ye abide in me. 5. I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing. 6. If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered; and men gather them, and cast them into the fire, and they are burned. 7. If ye abide in me, and my words abide in you, ye shall ask what ye will, and it shall be done unto you...14. Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you. “
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,731
USA
✟184,857.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Yes I do and I have spoke about it many times

It means

“a primary verb; to stay (in a given place, state, relation or expectancy):--abide, continue, dwell, endure, be present, remain, stand, tarry (for), X thine own.”
So why think the word means salvation then?

As I have said

And the abiding is to be in Christ and he in us if a man dies not abide (remain, continue, dwell endure to the end) then he is cast forth as a branch no longer in Christ and withered dried up with no life flowing through him
And as I have said, this is about fellowship, or the lack of it. And the result of it.

These things are very clear as Jesus told us.

John 15 - 4. Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye, except ye abide in me. 5. I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing. 6. If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered; and men gather them, and cast them into the fire, and they are burned. 7. If ye abide in me, and my words abide in you, ye shall ask what ye will, and it shall be done unto you...14. Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you. “
What is clear is that abiding is required for fruit production.

And please don't use metaphors (figures of speech) to formulate doctrine.

In this agricultural metaphor, a farmer simply discards branches that aren't producing. There's NOTHING about hell in this metaphor.

The Bible uses the word "fire" for many kinds of judgments. It does NOT singularly refer to hell.

Actually, WHEN the Bible does use "fire" in the sense of hell or the lake of fire, it includes the word "eternal" to make that clear.

For example: Matt 18:8, 25:45 and Jude 7.
 
Upvote 0

LoveofTruth

Christ builds His church from within us
Jun 29, 2015
6,845
1,794
✟211,930.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
So why think the word means salvation then?

Salvation is in Christ and he is eternal life. The word abiding itself is not salvation. But if we abide in Christ through faith and continual belief then we abide in eternal life in the Son of God.

This abiding is directly related to eternal life in Christ and I can use many other verses to show this, for example

"24 Let that therefore abide in you, which ye have heard from the beginning. If [conditional word] that which ye have heard from the beginning shall remain in you, ye also shall continue in the Son, and in the Father. [to continue in the Son and in the Father is eternal life, this abiding is to continue knowing God and the Son John 17:2 KJV] 25 And this is the promise that he hath promised us, even eternal life. [this abiding has a promise attached to it IF we continue and remain or abide in Christ, that is that we will have eternal life in Christ Jesus Christ is that eternal life either he is in us or not (2 Cor 13:5, 1 John 1:1,2, 1 John 5:20 KJV] "(1 John 2:24,25 KJV)



And as I have said, this is about fellowship, or the lack of it. And the result of it."

I already showed how that fellowship is the partnership and participation in Christ as we live in him. This is only as we abide, or remain, and continue in him. Only n this abiding can we say we know Jesus Christ. If we abide not we will be in sin and cannot say we have seen him neither known him (in that state of darkness, for we would not be in the light) this is all as John says as well as Jesus.)

"6 Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him."(1 John 3:6 KJV)

What is clear is that abiding is required for fruit production.And please don't use metaphors (figures of speech) to formulate doctrine.

This abiding Jesus speaks of is how we can be called his children and saved in Christ, if and only if WE ABIDE ( remain, dwell, continue) with him. If we do not we are in sin and don’t know him and are cast forth as a branch. This talk Jesus had is not just about agriculture. It is about he being the vine and believers the branches.


Jesus himself was not simply talking about agriculture but deep things of the spiritual life in him and those that would not continue in him .

And if we do not bear fruit from him then he said he will cut us off. W can do nothing without him as he said n that chapter.

Paul also uses agricultural examples for spiritual trth and he says

Romans 6:5
For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:"


You are way off here trying to minimalize Jesus words in John 15 to some farming example only.


One time Jesus was speaking a spiritual truth and the apostles missed it and thought he was talking about lieteral bread he said

"6 Then Jesus said unto them, Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees.
7 And they reasoned among themselves, saying, It is because we have taken no bread.

8 Which when Jesus perceived, he said unto them, O ye of little faith, why reason ye among yourselves, because ye have brought no bread?

9 Do ye not yet understand,..."(Matthew 16:6-9 KJV)

In this agricultural metaphor, a farmer simply discards branches that aren't producing. There's NOTHING about hell in this metaphor.

The Bible uses the word "fire" for many kinds of judgments. It does NOT singularly refer to hell.
The cast off and withered and thrown into the fire. Obviously relates to those who do not continue or remain in Him and so without him they can do nothing but fade away and be eventually cast into the fire. He is not talking about farming or burning literal branches. He is referring to those who are either in HIM or not. The context and meaning is not difficult to see. I marvel that you don't see this.

I think your bias for your error in doctrine about the false OSAS has caused you to not accept any verses that directly rebuke it.

Reconsider the entire context is about being in Christ and walking in the spirit and this is where Christ in us works .

"I am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman. (Clearly showing that the vine does not simply relate to a farming example but the vine is Jesus and the father the husbandman. If you try to avoid this you will not undrstand Jesus spiritual language of truth.)

2 Every branch in me [here those that are in Him and he in them are spiritually alive and have his life flowing through them to produce good works] that beareth not fruit he taketh away:[to be taken away here is to be taken out of Christ, the vine, and what life do they have then?] and every branch that beareth fruit, he purgeth it, that it may bring forth more fruit.


3 Now ye are clean through the word which I have spoken unto you.


4 Abide in me, and I in you. [this abiding in Christ is salvation and life and from where all our works come from] As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye, except ye abide in me.[Jesus explains that he is not talking about simple farming, he says "no more can ye, except ye abide in me"[this is as clear as it gets. He shows them that they are like a branch in him that can only have life if it is connected or remains and continues to abide in the vine]



5 I am the vine, ye are the branches: [here Jesus defines what he is talking about and is not simply talking about farming and agricultural issues, which is obvious] He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing. [fruit here is not farming literal fruit, but spiritual and if they do not abide in him they can do nothing of life and any goodness. We are his workmanship created in Christ jesus unto good works. You know a tree by its fruit. A good tree cannot produce corrupt fruit and a corrupt tree cannot produce good fruit. These spiritual examples are very important and relate directly to salvation and life in Christ.].



6 If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered; and men gather them, and cast them into the fire, and they are burned.[here Jesus is talking about men , not fruit abiding in him, he says they are LIKE or AS a branch. This is spiritual language and truth. The fire also is related to where they will go and this death and separation from Christ is eternal death. Because if they abide in him they have eternal life. if not they do not have eternal life abiding in them and so ae in death and withered.



7 If ye abide in me, and my words abide in you, ye shall ask what ye will, and it shall be done unto you.



8 Herein is my Father glorified, that ye bear much fruit; so shall ye be my disciples.[fruit bearing here is not about literal fruit but about spiritual fruit and by doing so we shall be his disciples. if not we are not his disciples as the example is showing]



9 As the Father hath loved me, so have I loved you: continue ye in my love.



10 If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father's commandments, and abide in his love.[Here the abideing is conditional upon the word "IF" and keeping his commandments and then we shall cntinue in his love. If we have no love in us are we saved?] if a man say he is in the light and hate his brother he abides in death and eternal life is not in him ( 1 John 1 and 3;15 etc)]



11 These things have I spoken unto you, that my joy might remain in you, and that your joy might be full.



12 This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you.


13 Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.


14 Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.



15 Henceforth I call you not servants; for the servant knoweth not what his lord doeth: but I have called you friends; for all things that I have heard of my Father I have made known unto you.


16 Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and ordained you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in my name, he may give it you.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,731
USA
✟184,857.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Salvation is in Christ and he is eternal life. The word abiding itself is not salvation.
Thank you for agreeing with me.

But if we abide in Christ through faith and continual belief then we abide in eternal life in the Son of God.
Just know that no one gets saved by "abiding". John 15 shows that in order to bear fruit, one must abide.

And, does "grieving" (Eph 5:18) or "quenching" (1 Thess 5:19) sound anything like abiding? No. And these are commands to STOP doing these things.

Which proves that believers may not abide, nor bear fruit. But, as believers, are STILL saved.

btw, I'm NOT advocating either grieving or quenching the Spirit. I STRONGLY advise against it, as Paul commanded believers to STOP doing these things.

My point is that salvation is secured for every believer. But alone with this guarantee, comes the reality of God's painful discipline for those who think they can "get away with" doing their own thing. Far from it.

Does being turned over to satan for the destruction of the flesh sound anything like a mere "slap on the wrist"? Sure doesn't.

This abiding is directly related to eternal life in Christ and I can use many other verses to show this, for example

"24 Let that therefore abide in you, which ye have heard from the beginning. If [conditional word] that which ye have heard from the beginning shall remain in you, ye also shall continue in the Son, and in the Father. [to continue in the Son and in the Father is eternal life, this abiding is to continue knowing Hod and the Son John 17:2 KJV] 25 And this is the promise that he hath promised us, even eternal life. [this abiding has a promise attached to it IF we continue and remain or abide in Christ, that is that we will have eternal life in Christ Jesus Christ is that eternal life either he is in us or not (2 Cor 13:5, 1 John 1:1,2, 1 John 5:20 KJV] "(1 John 2:24,25 KJV)
You're still missing the meaning of abiding. The continuing is about fellowship, not relationship.

Can you separate your parent's DNA from you? Of course not. Neither can you separate God's DNA (indwelling Holy Spirit) from you.

I already showed how that fellowship is the partnership and participation in Christ as we live in him.
That's been my point from the start. We agree on this.

This is only as we abide, or remain, and continue in him. Only n this abiding can we say we know Jesus Christ. If we abide not we will be in sin and cannot say we have seen him neither known him (in that state of darkness, for we would not be in the light) this is all as John says as well as Jesus.)
Yet, none of this proves that salvation can be lost, or that one who has believed was never saved.

"6 Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him."(1 John 3:6 KJV)

This is the spiritual DNA I just referred to. Go to v.9 for the actual words that denote this spiritual DNA. "God's seed".

This abiding Jesus speaks of is how we can be called his children and saved in Christ, if and only if WE ABIDE ( remain, dwell, continue) with him.
Disagree. We are saved by believing in Him, not abiding in Him. And we are called His children on the basis of believing in Him, not abiding in Him. Your view continues to be confused and not in line with the Bible. John 1:12 and Gal 3:26 tells us how to become His children.

If we do not we are in sin and don;t know him and are cast forth as a branch. This talk Jesus had is not just about agriculture. It is about he being the vine and believers the branches.
But nothing about loss of salvation. But loss of fellowship, and loss of fruit bearing.


And if we do not bear fruit from him then he said he will cut us off. W can do nothing without him as he said n that chapter.
Are you aware of the phrase "cut off" in the OT? He referred to dying due to violation of the law.

Exodus 31:14 - “ ‘Observe the Sabbath, because it is holy to you. Anyone who desecrates it is to be put to death; those who do any work on that day must be cut off from their people.

So, in John 15, Jesus was alluding to the fact that non fruit bearing believers may suffer the "sin unto death" for their disobedience. That's what "cut off" refers to. Everyone in Israel during Jesus' life on earth knew that.

You are way off here trying to minimalize Jesus words in John 15 to some farming example only.
There's hardly anything "minimalized" regarding God's discipline unto death.

The cast off and withered and thrown into the fire. Obviously relates to those who do not continue or remain in Him and so without him they can do nothing but fade away and be eventually cast into the fire. He is not talking about farming or burning literal branches. He is referring to those who are wither in HIM or not. The context and meaning is not difficult to see. I marvel that you don't see this.
I marvel at your confusion.

I think your bias for your error in doctrine about the false OSAS has caused you to not accept any verses that directly rebuke it.
Since there aren't any verses that "directly rebuke it" (what a joke!), I'm not biased.

otoh, John 10:28 is the CLEAREST and most straightforward statement about eternal security in the Bible. It couldn't be more clear.

Those who have been given eternal life shall never perish. That's what Jesus said.

Do you believe this or not? It seems you do NOT, based on calling OSAS "false".

There's not ANY verses that make a clear and unambiguous statement that salvation can be lost. Not ANY. And most of the verses that are used to "support" that idea are parables and metaphors, hardly the way to clarify anything. Even Jesus' disciples couldn't understand His parables, and He had to explain them to His disciples.

Reconsider the entire context is about being in Christ and walking in the spirit and this is where Christ in us works .
Yep. Totally agree.

"I am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman. (Clearly showing that the vine does not simply relate to a farming example but the vine is Jesus and the father the husbandman. If you try to avoid this you will not undrstand Jesus spiritual language of truth.)

2 Every branch in me [here those that are in Him and he in them are spiritually alive and have his life flowing through them to produce good works] that beareth not fruit he taketh away:[to be taken away here is to be taken out of Christ, the vine, and what life do they have then?] and every branch that beareth fruit, he purgeth it, that it may bring forth more fruit.


3 Now ye are clean through the word which I have spoken unto you.


4 Abide in me, and I in you. [this abiding in Christ is salvation and life and from where all our works come from] As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye, except ye abide in me.[Jesus explains that he is not talking about simple farming, he says "no more can ye, except ye abide in me"[this is as clear as it gets. He shows them that they are like a branch in him that can only have life if it is connected or remains and continues to abide in the vine]

OK, what does v.3 say? Jesus is declaring the 11 disciples "clean", meaning SAVED.

Then, the very next verse He said "abide in Me and I in you". It's a command to the disciples. If it referred to getting or being saved, then the disciples would be involved in their own salvation. That is foreign to the Bible and God's plan.

So, it was to SAVED people that Jesus told to abide in Him. And He gave the purpose of abiding: to bear fruit. Not to "get saved" or to "stay saved". But to bear fruit.

This is service to Christ. Only applicable to believers.

5 I am the vine, ye are the branches: [here Jesus defines what he is talking about and is not simply talking about farming and agricultural issues, which is obvious] He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing. [fruit here is not farming literal fruit, but spiritual and if they do not abide in him they can do nothing of life and any goodness. We are his workmanship created in Christ jesus unto good works. You know a tree by its fruit. A good tree cannot produce corrupt fruit and a corrupt tree cannot produce good fruit. These spiritual examples are very important and relate directly to salvation and life in Christ.].

How is this not clearly about fruit bearing, and not salvation?

Because if they abide in him they have eternal life. if not they do not have eternal life abiding in them and so ae in death and withered.

Please provide any verse that links abiding with having eternal life. That abiding is the CAUSE of having eternal life.


7 If ye abide in me, and my words abide in you, ye shall ask what ye will, and it shall be done unto you.

8 Herein is my Father glorified, that ye bear much fruit; so shall ye be my disciples.[fruit bearing here is not about literal fruit but about spiritual fruit and by doing so we shall be his disciples. if not we are not his disciples as the example is showing]

Here is the REASON believers are to abide in Christ and bear fruit: to GLORIFY God. Not to get saved, or maintain salvation.
 
Upvote 0

LoveofTruth

Christ builds His church from within us
Jun 29, 2015
6,845
1,794
✟211,930.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Thank you for agreeing with me.

No, not agreeing with you. I simply said the word “abiding” is not the salvation. But all believers must abide or continue and remain in the faith or they will be lost and if THEY of their own free choice choose not to abide in Christ they are lost and fall away and are no longer in the salvation in Christ.

If you try to say that believers do not have to continue in the faith and abide in Christ to continue in the saivation in Christ then you make all thier actions forced upon by God and they become robots and then you may imply that horrible blasphemous doctrine that says God makes men sin and causes men to lie , deny him and blaspheme against the Spirit etc.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

LoveofTruth

Christ builds His church from within us
Jun 29, 2015
6,845
1,794
✟211,930.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Thank you for agreeing with me.


Just know that no one gets saved by "abiding". John 15 shows that in order to bear fruit, one must abide.

And, does "grieving" (Eph 5:18) or "quenching" (1 Thess 5:19) sound anything like abiding? No. And these are commands to STOP doing these things.

Which proves that believers may not abide, nor bear fruit. But, as believers, are STILL saved.

btw, I'm NOT advocating either grieving or quenching the Spirit. I STRONGLY advise against it, as Paul commanded believers to STOP doing these things.

My point is that salvation is secured for every believer. But alone with this guarantee, comes the reality of God's painful discipline for those who think they can "get away with" doing their own thing. Far from it.

Does being turned over to satan for the destruction of the flesh sound anything like a mere "slap on the wrist"? Sure doesn't.


You're still missing the meaning of abiding. The continuing is about fellowship, not relationship.

Can you separate your parent's DNA from you? Of course not. Neither can you separate God's DNA (indwelling Holy Spirit) from you.


That's been my point from the start. We agree on this.


Yet, none of this proves that salvation can be lost, or that one who has believed was never saved.


This is the spiritual DNA I just referred to. Go to v.9 for the actual words that denote this spiritual DNA. "God's seed".


Disagree. We are saved by believing in Him, not abiding in Him. And we are called His children on the basis of believing in Him, not abiding in Him. Your view continues to be confused and not in line with the Bible. John 1:12 and Gal 3:26 tells us how to become His children.


But nothing about loss of salvation. But loss of fellowship, and loss of fruit bearing.



Are you aware of the phrase "cut off" in the OT? He referred to dying due to violation of the law.

Exodus 31:14 - “ ‘Observe the Sabbath, because it is holy to you. Anyone who desecrates it is to be put to death; those who do any work on that day must be cut off from their people.

So, in John 15, Jesus was alluding to the fact that non fruit bearing believers may suffer the "sin unto death" for their disobedience. That's what "cut off" refers to. Everyone in Israel during Jesus' life on earth knew that.


There's hardly anything "minimalized" regarding God's discipline unto death.


I marvel at your confusion.


Since there aren't any verses that "directly rebuke it" (what a joke!), I'm not biased.

otoh, John 10:28 is the CLEAREST and most straightforward statement about eternal security in the Bible. It couldn't be more clear.

Those who have been given eternal life shall never perish. That's what Jesus said.

Do you believe this or not? It seems you do NOT, based on calling OSAS "false".

There's not ANY verses that make a clear and unambiguous statement that salvation can be lost. Not ANY. And most of the verses that are used to "support" that idea are parables and metaphors, hardly the way to clarify anything. Even Jesus' disciples couldn't understand His parables, and He had to explain them to His disciples.


Yep. Totally agree.


OK, what does v.3 say? Jesus is declaring the 11 disciples "clean", meaning SAVED.

Then, the very next verse He said "abide in Me and I in you". It's a command to the disciples. If it referred to getting or being saved, then the disciples would be involved in their own salvation. That is foreign to the Bible and God's plan.

So, it was to SAVED people that Jesus told to abide in Him. And He gave the purpose of abiding: to bear fruit. Not to "get saved" or to "stay saved". But to bear fruit.

This is service to Christ. Only applicable to believers.


How is this not clearly about fruit bearing, and not salvation?



Please provide any verse that links abiding with having eternal life. That abiding is the CAUSE of having eternal life.



Here is the REASON believers are to abide in Christ and bear fruit: to GLORIFY God. Not to get saved, or maintain salvation.

No, in John 15 the point ther is that if a man who abides in Jesus does not continue to abide, then he is cast forth as a branch and withered and is cast into th fire. He then would be “without Jesus” and can do nothing as Jesus said.

This clearly shows that s person an be abiding in Christ and then choose not to abide and be lost even if he once was abiding.

Also Jesus said they were his friends if they did what he commanded and continued to abide and to continue in his word.

The context is very clear to the unbiased reader .

I am busy right now or I would have addressed every one of your errors maybe later Lord willing.

Also bearing fruit is only possible as we abide or remain in Christ this is the evidence that we abide in him.

As the body without the Spirit is dead so a believer without Jesus Christ is dead

And you know a tree by it’s fruit
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,731
USA
✟184,857.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
No, not agreeing with you. I simply said the word “abiding” is not the salvation. But all believers must abide or continue and remain in the faith or they will be lost and if THEY of their own free choice choose not to abide in Christ they are lost and fall away and are no longer in the salvation in Christ.
If a believer must perform some (any) action in order to stay saved, then that is nothing more than a works based salvation. It's called faith plus works, because abiding is obviously more than believing. It involves lifestyle, and that falls under the heading of works, deeds, etc.

If you try to say that believers do not have to continue in the faith and abide in Christ to continue in the saivation in Christ then you make all thier actions forced upon by God and they become robots and then you may imply that horrible blasphemous doctrine that says God makes men sin and causes men to lie , deny him and blaspheme against the Spirit etc.
What??!! I don't understand what you mean by "then you make all their actions forced upon by God and they become robots". I see no connection between failing to continue in abiding and becoming robots.

Or that it says "God makes men sin, etc".

Apparently you do not either believe what Jesus said in John 10:28, or you just don't understand what He said.

But what He said is crystal clear about eternal security.

When He said, "I give them eternal life" He was teaching that He alone is the CAUSE of having eternal life. Agree or disagree?

When He said, "and they shall never perish" He was teaching that the EFFECT of having eternal life is to never perish. Agree or disagree?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Danthemailman
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,731
USA
✟184,857.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
No, in John 15 the point ther is that if a man who abides in Jesus does not continue to abide, then he is cast forth as a branch and withered and is cast into th fire. He then would be “without Jesus” and can do nothing as Jesus said.
The whole point of Jesus' remarks is about fruit bearing. That's the subject of the section. And one must abide in Christ in order to bear fruit. How is this not clear?

And fellowship (intimacy) is key here. How can a believer bear fruit IF they are out of fellowship? Kinda like how can a husband and wife enjoy intimacy (fellowship) when there isn't any at the moment?

This clearly shows that s person an be abiding in Christ and then choose not to abide and be lost even if he once was abiding.
There is nothing about losing salvation in what Jesus said to His 11 disciples. In fact, He noted that they are already saved by the phrase "you are already clean".

It seems you're just not willing to admit or acknowledge that abiding is fellowship, not doing something for getting or keeping salvation.

In a marriage, it is obvious that in order for there to be fellowship (intimacy) between the spouses, both must "do something". But each one can also do something to lose fellowship.

We see this idea in Scripture.

Paul commands believers to:
1. be filled with the Spirit - Eph 5:18
2. walk by means of the Spirit - Gal 5:16

This is HOW fellowship is maintained.

However, Paul also commanded believers to:
1. STOP grieving the Spirit - Eph 4:30
2. STOP quenching the Spirit - 1 Thess 5:19

If either spouse grieved or quenched the other spouse, do you see HOW fellowship would be lost?

Also Jesus said they were his friends if they did what he commanded and continued to abide and to continue in his word.
Yes. Fellowship.

The context is very clear to the unbiased reader .
I believe that. And my explanation is logical, and reasonable. And fits the passage. But those with an agenda must force the discarding of a branch as being cast into hell.

In an agricultural world, that's what farmers do when branches no longer serve their purpose. They are discarded into a fire. To make this a loss of salvation is to "spiritualize" the text, and take the metaphor MUCH FARTHER than intended.

I am busy right now or I would have addressed every one of your errors maybe later Lord willing.
I have no doubt that the Lord is very willing for EVERY ONE of my errors to be corrected.

I'll be looking forward to it. And I mean it.

Also bearing fruit is only possible as we abide or remain in Christ this is the evidence that we abide in him.
I agree, and there is nothing in this statement that supports your claim that salvation will be lost if one ceases to abide.

If one spouse grieves or quenches the other spouse, by thereby lose fellowship, are they still married, or not? {the answer is yes, of course}

As the body without the Spirit is dead so a believer without Jesus Christ is dead
There is no such thing as "a believer without Jesus Christ", since Jesus promised the coming Holy Spirit who would be with us FOREVER. Do you believe that? John 14:16

And you know a tree by it’s fruit
Check the context. That verse (Matt 7:20 is in reference to false teachers, not believers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Danthemailman
Upvote 0

EmSw

White Horse Rider
Apr 26, 2014
6,434
718
✟74,044.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
The whole point of Jesus' remarks is about fruit bearing. That's the subject of the section. And one must abide in Christ in order to bear fruit. How is this not clear?

And fellowship (intimacy) is key here. How can a believer bear fruit IF they are out of fellowship? Kinda like how can a husband and wife enjoy intimacy (fellowship) when there isn't any at the moment?
We see this idea in Scripture.

The Greek word for abide does not include 'fellowship'.
 
Upvote 0

Tayla

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 30, 2017
1,694
801
USA
✟169,815.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Let me suggest to you that Paul knew nothing of any betrayal by Judas because the story was not developed until after Paul's death. The story itself is a midrashic construction based on a number of Old Testament references.
Wow, this is scary. Seems to me the apostles who wrote the historical accounts should be trusted in their accurate reporting of history.
 
Upvote 0

Micah888

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2018
1,091
778
82
CALGARY
✟28,676.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Judas was once saved and then lost his salvation.
Looks like the fantasizers are coming out of the woodwork today. The Hebrew were blacks. Judas was saved. The earth is flat. Revelation was all fulfilled in 70 AD.

We won't go on since some fantasies apply to beliefs held by certain groups and they will get very offended.

Why do some Christians have to resort to fantasy when Christ said "You shall know the truth..."?
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,731
USA
✟184,857.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
The Greek word for abide does not include 'fellowship'.
Go ahead and ignore my point. Can a believer bear fruit if they are out of fellowship, by way of grieving or quenching the Spirit?

Or, can a believe fail to bear fruit if they are in fellowship, by way of being filled with the Spirit and walking by His means?
 
Upvote 0

JackRT

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2015
15,722
16,445
82
small town Ontario, Canada
✟767,445.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
Wow, this is scary. Seems to me the apostles who wrote the historical accounts should be trusted in their accurate reporting of history.

I am convinced that the gospels are second or third generation accounts. That an actual apostle wrote one of the gospels is most unlikely.
 
Upvote 0

EmSw

White Horse Rider
Apr 26, 2014
6,434
718
✟74,044.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Go ahead and ignore my point. Can a believer bear fruit if they are out of fellowship, by way of grieving or quenching the Spirit?

Or, can a believe fail to bear fruit if they are in fellowship, by way of being filled with the Spirit and walking by His means?

The Greek word for abide does not include 'fellowship'.

The Greek word for grieve does not include 'out of fellowship'.
 
Upvote 0