Cessationism is based on the premise of Sola Scriptura, which says that I only listen to scripture and never special revelation. Scripture validates special revelation. You've got a problem, there.
I don't listen to George, because I only listen to Bob. Bob tells me to listen to George, but I refuse, because I strictly follow Bob (which is obviously false, or I would listen to George).
If you are cessationist, then you are necessarily not an adherent of Sola scriptura, by direct logical contradiction. You can post all you want about the ills brought upon the faith by special revelation, but none of that changes anything. We were commanded to test all prophecy. You know that, if you're a Sola scriptura kind of guy. There is only one way to do that. The alternatives are to either accept all prophecy uncritically, or reject all prophecy uncritically. Both of the alternatives are equal opposites, meaning that both cause the same degree of damage. One is a positive behavior and causes positive damage that everyone can see, and the other is a negative behavior and causes damage not readily seen. It is a preventative harm. You can't see the damage that you have done, because you cannot show the good that you have prevented. You can sit back and point to your equal and opposite heresy and denounce them for the damage they've caused, while your own damage remains veiled.
Test all prophecy. If you reject it outright, then you're not obeying scripture. If you accept it too freely, then you're not obeying scripture.