Christian officer wins appeal over suspension for questioning Islam ‘indoctrination’ session
- By RileyG
Good for him! I’m happy to hear this!
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Thank you Joymercy, for answering my question and for explaining to me what you meant. I appreciate that.I guess it means that I am enjoying doing a little bit of singing each day, most of it pretty simple lines and verses.
Each day of the week, there are different songs and chants to sing, and they are also done each day at various hours of the day.
The idea is to be in praise and Thanksgiving all the day long.
Here is but a sample Monday Evening Prayer
Amazing! Thank you for sharing!This 900 year old Catholic Church in Wicklow, Ireland, is older than every single Protestant denomination in existence.
View attachment 380131

I would leave before you end up having a child by him. That would complicate things 10 times over.I have a job so I`m making some money but it`s not enough because it`s a zero hours contract. I really desire marriage but I don`t think I want to marry him. I need to focus more on becoming a woman of God and trust that He will guide me to make the right deccision. I know deep inside what I want but maybe God has other plans for me.
Tight race in 6th Congressional District as count continuesRep. Kevin Kiley (R-Roseville) made a surprise announcement Friday evening that he would run for reelection as an independent candidate.
I read a little bit of Being and Time years ago. I'd like to understand better about what Heidegger actually believed himself. Was he religious himself?
What I read is that his atheism was methodological, it had to do with his approach to philosophy. When it comes to philosophy he brackets the question of God. He seems to want to keep philosophy and theology separate.
What do people think about this?jkl
The debate is limited to US House districts.If a district voted in an elected official, The government should not be able to then come in, and displace that elected official to another district.
The elected official should remain where they were voted for.
It's shady, politics that the Democrats started, and it ought to be fixed!
That's all i have to say.
I could never quite grasp the Aristotelian concept of immanent form until I read Abraham P. Bos's book on Aristotelian pneuma as the carrier of form. That was when I realized this very idea could help solve a classic puzzle: what exactly is quantum reality, and what kind of existence are we actually dealing with?
I want to share a way of looking at this that fixes a major blank spot in the classic Copenhagen model, without getting stuck in the traps of modern realism. While the Copenhagen model is great because it doesn't treat quantum states like everyday classical objects, it doesn't really explain what is actually there. This lack of a solid philosophical foundation often makes it feel like a shallow tool, just a set of math equations for predicting things rather than a description of real life. Because of this, physicists and philosophers usually default to realist interpretations.
Rather than adopting such realist views, I suggest we look back to an old idea from Aristotle called hylomorphism (the pairing of matter and form), but complemented with the concept of pneuma. Think of pneuma as an active, subtle, and formative energy. In this pneumatic view, a quantum state isn't a physical particle or a wave travelling through space; it is pure, objective potential. Before we measure it, the quantum object is identical to the laws of physics themselves, existing as an un-incarnated, pneumatic logos. It only takes on classical, thing-like properties when it physically "incarnates" during measurement.
This pneumatic approach completely rules out the realist assumption that there is a pre-existing, definite classical past. Take John Wheeler's famous cosmic delayed-choice experiment. Realist thinking leads to the bizarre conclusion of retrocausality, making it seem like a measurement we make today can reach back billions of years to rewrite a photon's history. The pneumatic framework dissolves this paradox completely. The photon never needed to travel as a classical wave or particle in the first place; it was always an irreducibly quantum, pneumatic entity. Measurement is simply an "incarnation event" that makes things concrete in the present, meaning we don't need any time-traveling magic to explain it. Pneumatic quantum reality is primary, while wave and particle are merely secondary manifestations.
To see how we lost the ability to think this way, we have to look at how Western philosophy changed over time. Thinkers like Maximus Confessor (c. 580-662) understood the logoi as active, organizing principles existing right inside natural things. But when later medieval philosophy stripped these forms of their pneumatic carrier, nominalism took over, flattening everything into mere surface-level form. Eventually, this led to the modern view that order is just something our minds project onto the world. However, quantum physics has retroactively challenged this modern bias, proving that there is indeed a real, non-classical organizing principle operating inside nature, completely independent of our minds.
Ultimately, I see quantum measurement as a two-way street, a participatory event where pneumatic quantum reality and our human concepts meet. On a cosmic scale, this process is happening everywhere, all the time, through environmental and gravitational decoherence. Cosmic history is an ongoing, irreversible process of physical incarnation, moving from a unified, low-entropy quantum beginning to the highly differentiated classical world we see today. Read more about this on my retro nineties homepage: Pneumatic Hylomorphism and Quantum Philosophy: Retrieving the Logoi in the Copenhagen Model.