Melania Trump passionately defends abortion rights in upcoming memoir
- By ThatRobGuy
- News & Current Events (Articles Required)
- 51 Replies
Sure they do...I'll explain below in the next bit...Persuading people is how activist/advocacy groups work. (They don't "dictate policy". SMH.)
"The middle" doesn't have any noteworthy PACs or lobbying forces.OK, you found some. And I don't care. Extremists have extreme positions and often aren't friendly to those in their direction, but in the middle. (You should know this. Your whole posting position is built around these kinds of things.) The issue was whether they were rejected for holding such a "legal but rare" position by the broad groups supporting abortion rights. (For example the Democratic Party.)
They control policy on certain issues by either bolstering up or tamping down certain candidates (usually in a primary environment).
If there's two democrats (one who's moderate on abortion and another who's position aligns with their own), they buy ads, send out mailers and texts, etc... to make sure people see the one who agrees with them as the "true defender of women's rights", and label the other as a "sellout" or weak.
It's often known as the AIPAC playbook, but they all do it.
If you want to see how advocacy/activist groups control policy, this is how
AIPAC Demonstrates Its Clout With Defeat of a Second ‘Squad’ Member
The pro-Israel group put more than $8 million into a primary to help beat Representative Cori Bush of Missouri, the second Democrat it has successfully targeted for not supporting Israel in the war.
If a candidate isn't voting the way they like on certain issues, they spend the money required to get them replaced with someone who will. (and then others get the message)
"How she's campaigning on the issue"Good grief this is going nowhere. If you want a demonstration that a lot of "pro-choice" people *aren't* denigrating those who take the "legal but rare" position, just look at the way the VP is campaigning on this issue. She speaks of "restoring Roe", not some absolutist, extremist position from the NARAL playbook.
Like being the first President or Vice President in history to do a meet & greet and public appearance at an abortion clinic?
Harris still dodged, however, on providing details about what type of restrictions – if any – she supports around abortion. Instead, she pivoted: saying that she wants to “reinstate the protections of Roe,”
Why did she dodge & pivot? If a centrist position on this is "acceptable" to wide swaths of "regular" pro-choice advocates (or "extreme" pro-choice activists are just a fringe few that nobody is afraid of and don't have any stroke), she should've been able to directly answer the question and proclaim the centrist position on it without fear, correct?
The reality is, she's afraid to tick off NARAL for the same reasons republicans are afraid to tick off the NRA. Doesn't matter if either of those groups are "ideologically radical"... they're one phone/text/mailer campaign or TV commercial away from having their campaign getting torpedoed if they don't "kiss the ring"
They're one text/email blast campaign (which can reach millions of people for a relatively low cost) from having 10+ million people get a negative message about them.
Upvote
0
