There’s a Giant Flaw in Human History
- By stevevw
- Physical & Life Sciences
- 75 Replies
What you are describing or rather the basis and assumption that this is being based on is itself the point of the video. This is still trying to conform human history to the evolutionary story. That it was all about survival.Finally watched the video. It's not a earth shattering as it claims. All of my life I've been taught that Neanderthals weren't the brutes initially assumed. I've yet to try it, but would like to make a throwing stick (not a spear) similar to what H. heidelbergenis might have used. Like all throwing sticks, they were airfoils made to travel far and level. The video seems like arguing against a theory that has been on the ropes for about 60 years.
I think it misses it in insisting on permanent settlements. If there was enough food, a settlement could be permanent. The whole point of a nomadic life was that different food is available in different places at different times, and they move to go with it. That holds if the food is a herd of some sort. Food goes yonder; you follow it. Structures are just as easily tents as buildings, and some sort of organization makes camp life more efficient and pleasant. And being nomadic doesn't necessarily mean being on constant move. Go here when the salmon are running; go there when there's bison about. Should be about time for the berries to be ripe over yonder. That sort of thing. And if you've preserved food in some way, have enough to settle down for winger. Iif you come back to the same campsite year after year, then it makes sense to have something waiting when you return.
When it seems the evidence points to a much more complex history and often dictated by religious belief rather than survival. The great megaliths are not about shelter or fortresses for defense but monuments to the gods.
Everything was about the gods and this began very early. Much ealier than thought.
The narrative was that we are much smarter today because we have evolved from the primitive ways. But the idea of primitive and knowledge is dictated by todays worldview. It may be that these ancient peoples were just as smart if not smarter and we have become dumber in some ways.
Its just that what we consider being smart or knowledgable today is based on westernised ideas that make other ways of knowing primitive or superstition. Its a western centric view of knowledge.
Upvote
0