• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Action on Gabbard Evidence, Ex-Obama officials face federal grand jury probe into whether they promoted false Trump-Russia ties

Actually, that’s NOT the definition of treason. The definition of treason is, according to the Oxford dictionary, the act of betraying one’s country, especially by attempting to kill the sovereign (leader) or overthrow the government.

Or, according to Merriam-Webster:

Or according to dictionary.com

It has only been used once in our history, and that was during wartime, but its use is not limited to wartime according to the definition.

Interesting.

-CryptoLutheran
Upvote 0

Trump Threatens Federal Takeover of Washington After Member of DOGE Is Assaulted

More than half of this list are in red states and god help anyone even passing through Missouri.
I have relatives in the St. Louis area. There are safe places in the county, but there are some really dangerous areas. Much worse than D.C.
  • Informative
Reactions: GoldenBoy89
Upvote 0

JPPT1974's Daily Devotions

Christ tells us in
Romans that He will take care
Of it and that we need to
Allow Him to just handle it
In His own perfect and even
Loving way that we could possibly
Not had on doing so
Jesus wants us to not take
Matters into our own hands.
"Vengeance is mine. I will repay"
Upvote 0

Trump Threatens Federal Takeover of Washington After Member of DOGE Is Assaulted

Nope. It's not even in the top 15. And the homicide rate in D.C. has been falling for decades. Would you like me to show you again?

Pretty much any urban area made a state would have the highest homicide rate of any state in the United States. It's just that many U.S. cities have a higher homicide rate than Washington D.C.

America’s Murder Capitals: A 2025 Ranking of the Deadliest Cities​


View attachment 368485
More than half of this list are in red states and god help anyone even passing through Missouri.
Upvote 0

Does Jesus have the power to raise all dead humans from a decade ago?

UFOs are just what the name stgands for UNIDENTIFIED flying objects. They could be angels, the could be demons, they could be meteors, they could be hallucinations, they could be space juck or spacecraft, they could be drones, on and on, ad infinitum. They could be anything that your imaginations can contrive, BECAUSE NO ONE HAS IDENTIFIED THEM. U-fos, right? So everybody gets to make up their very own sure 'nuff, no doubt, cold gots to be IDENTIFICATION of whatever they reckon the thing they couldn't identify "really is".

Right.

So the unco pious know that the UFOs are either angels keeping watch over us, or demonst rying to desceive us into believing they're not demons. The less pious declare that they're interstellar spacecraft, because the universe is JUST SO BLOODY BIG that it has to be full of spacemen who drive flying saucers, and whose greates joy is driving them to planets zillions of light years away and doing pointless and inexplicable things because. well, that's just what aliens do after a long boring flying saucer ride, and you just prove they don't!

Me? I'm an old enginer, so my imaginings are boering in the extreme. I reckon maybe, say, 90% of the UFO sightings are of perfectly ordinary stuff seen under less-than-perfect-conditions. BTW, I got that number, from MUFON, the oldest and least weird of the UFO investigation outfits. They investigate these reports, and on average about 90% of them are boring atuff like airplanes. (MUFON is probably infested with old killjoys.) Thet other 10% are... wait for it... unidentified. Who'd a thunk it? Zat mean they're spacement and/or demons? Nope, it means there's not enough information to say what they were at all But that's boring, so we make up cool stories.

Now to me, the really cool srories are the ones like The Nimitz Incident. Even the name is cool. innit? Loads of UFOs (or UAPs if you prefer) flying around, and one big "tic;tac:". Pretty cool. So what does old Jipsah say to that? The real bogey (AND MAYBE THE ONLY REAL ONE)... the TIC TAC. A really cool drone stuffed with 5th (or 6th) generation ecm's designed to make their enemies "see" (via their instruments), a sky full of aircraft that "defy the laws of Physics" in the only way possible - by being massless radio RF images of stuff that isn't really there.

But nobody has the tech to do that! Really? ECMs have been doing that for decades, just not nearly as well. But hey, it's more fun believing that we're being surveilled by aliens from light years away doing pointless and inexplicable stuff, than it is to think that maybe it's the product of a very old earthly nation that has a huge population of statististically speaking very brainy people and who produces engineers and scientists at a rate that ought to frighten anyone who might be forced to compete with them in a technological wrasslin' match. Just sayin'.

Nah, spacemen or demons. Cain't be nothin' else. Old Bill Ockham would be proud of ya.
Upvote 0

Survey reveals 47% of Republicans would still vote for Trump even if connected to Epstein's crimes

No, it's not plain enough....
He's already suspected by many of being involved in something he doesn't want revealed. And that his name in the files might implicate him in the sense you are pushing has been discussed for quite some time. There'd be no point in asking if people would vote for him on what is already suspected by many. And rejected by some.

The question takes it to the next level. And still people say 'Yeah, sure. It's not like we voted for a priest'.

He's already been convicted of fraud. And found to have effectively raped a woman. And people still support him. Why on earth would you be surprised if they supported him even if he was involved with Epstein?
Upvote 0

Limited atonement !

You just think you have, my position on limited atonement has not been proven wrong by you. You have just opposed it.
Of course you won't admit it, but I have proven it wrong. Scripture is very clear that Jesus died for the sins of the whole world (1 John 2:1-2) including the false teachers and prophets who Peter said denied the Lord who bought them (2 Peter 2:1). That you won't admit it doesn't change that I have proven limited atonement wrong with scripture. You are obviously very stubborn and believe what you want to believe regardless of what you are shown.
Upvote 0

My Textbook Challenge

If you take a molecular biology course that uses this textbook, will you be judged by what is written therein?

No. You'll be judged by how well you understand the concepts and details of molecular biology and how well you demonstrate this in assignments, examinations, labs/practicals, tutorials, course work and other assessments.

If you're taking the Harvard 'Molecular and Cell Biology' course you could just as likely use any well regarded and up-to-date molecular biology/cell biology text book in order to study to meet the requirements of the course.

It will just be fundamentally less convenient/more bothersome for the student than using the assigned/recommended text book (because the course structure is likely to mirror the assigned text). You also might get some shade from the prof/lecturer.

Back in the early 2000s I managed to get though second year international macroeconomics without a copy of the textbook (campus bookstore had sold out). It was a pain in the proverbial and I had to spend a lot of extra time in the library, but it was manageable.

These days I'd probably just jolly roger a copy online.
Upvote 0

Was ordinary and natural family a threat ?

Hello Steve. Sorry for my being late
Thats ok.
I meant if you deal with individuals, it's easier than with families.
Besides, do you think, were people interested in joining such a church like this you describe, they will easily abandon their familial background, if the latter is not conform with what is required to enter it ?
From what I understand the early church was family orientated. The family was a well established unit and usually if for example the parent was saved the whole family became saved.

Certainly if a Christian were to marry they should marry a Christian as Paul mentions not to be unequally yolked to a non Christian in marriage. But I guess if an individual was saved and their family not then they must also stay with that family and hope they are also saved.
i don't know.. May be
I think so. When you consider the early church was universal. Paul and Clement were writing to distant churches with the same teachings. But today we have 101 denominations with different beliefs and interpretations and see each other as 'the other' denomination there is division and disunity which is not of Christ.
Yes precisely. People are used to think by themselves. But.. Couldn't this state of things bear good fruit as well ? Doesn't God look for adorator in truth ?
Yes I agree. I think enlightenment was good in that it allowed people and churches to question and investigate the bible rather than be dictated to. But like many good things they can be used to dismiss the truth as well.

Thats why I think now more than ever we need to be sure about the teachings and expose when this is denied. I definitely think there are more wolves in the church today than in the early church because people were constantly reminded to stay true to the teachings.

But centuries of questioning and rationalisats opposing the teachings and offering alternative interpretations have muddied the waters as to what is truth and what is a manipulation of the truth. Especially when modern ideologies are used to justify the alternative interpretations because they are presented as nobel and the right thing to do.
Not sure whether the remembrance must alone be aimed at. Shouldn't we focus on the intensity of the sorrow consented and suffered by Jesus, since this underlines how much he loves us (the quantity of love and commitment towards us) ?
I see for example the breaking of bread in the Eucharist as a form of rememberance. I could imagine say 1 week or a month after Christ the they were breaking bread just as Christ said in memory of Him. This single act I think puts the believer in communion with Christs act of suffering for us by sacrificing His body and blood.

While at the same time bringing the church into the heart of Christs sacrifice and the new covenant He made with us. In fact the breaking of bread would have been the main part of worship with perhpas prayer and praising and the reading of the Torah and any new testament writings or oral testimony that were available.

Apart from worship it seems the church besides preahing the gospel was mainly concerned about looking after their own first. We hear a complaint that the church was not looking after the widows for example. Or to look after your own family first.

It seemed as though the church was seperate and insular to the surrounding culture. Paul and the disciples warning and trying to keep them seperate from the world.

But also to help the poor and I think many people came to the churches as they were seen as different to the hostile pagan world. Especially women who were well looked after byu the chuch. Many Gentiles were called God fearers and they attracted to Christianity and would come to the synagogues.
Upvote 0

prayer for God’s protection for me please.

Lord I pray for the protection of this person. If you could take care of this persons fears and whats troubling this person Lord that would be very appreciative. God i speak psalms 91 over this persons life and pray that this person is victorious through whatever battle that they are facing, Amen.
Upvote 0

Trump Threatens Federal Takeover of Washington After Member of DOGE Is Assaulted

The homicide rate in 2024 was 27.3, according to the Center for Public Safety Initiatives at Rochester Institute of Technology. While a big drop from the 2023 spike, it still ranked fourth-worst in the country.
Nope. It's not even in the top 15. And the homicide rate in D.C. has been falling for decades. Would you like me to show you again?
If D.C. were a state, it would have the highest homicide rate of any state in the United States, and would be retaining that dubious title year after year.
Pretty much any urban area made a state would have the highest homicide rate of any state in the United States. It's just that many U.S. cities have a higher homicide rate than Washington D.C.

America’s Murder Capitals: A 2025 Ranking of the Deadliest Cities​


1755050820569.png

  • Informative
Reactions: GoldenBoy89
Upvote 0

No person can come to Christ by their own freewill !

And if not, that is the individuals fault?
According to Calvinism, it can't be the individual's fault because Calvinism says that individuals are born totally depraved and they can't do anything about it unless God gives them repentance and faith. So, what is the Calvinism reasoning behind God's wrath and punishment of individuals who don't repent and don't believe? Who knows? There's no basis for it in Calvinism. I guess they think that God just enjoys punishing people for no real reason.
Upvote 0

Thessalonians 4 Does Not Teach a Rapture Separate from the Second Coming

You didn't address what I said at all. I mentioned how it talks about the Son of Man coming in the clouds of heaven TO the Ancient of Days and being brought before Him. Why did you not address that?
I said this, in case you didn't read it or understand it:
"I do see how you may read it, because it appears that the Son of Man 1st approaches the Court of Heaven, the Ancient of Days, before he comes to establish God's Kingdom. And Christ did ascend 1st to heaven, to the right hand of God the Father, well before he will return to set up God's Kingdom on the earth."

How is this not addressing where Jesus is "being brought to God the Father which would be in heaven?" I plainly said that Jesus, the "Sonof Man," is approaching, or "being brought," before the "Ancient of Days!" I did not ignore your point? On the contrary, I acknowledged it.
You are talking about when He comes in the clouds FROM heaven, but that is not what is referenced in Daniel 7:13-14 where it talks about Jesus being brought TO God the Father which would be in heaven and is exactly what happened at His ascension.
As I just said, I referenced that. And I explained why I hold to my position against your theory. I believe the entry of the Son of Man into the Courtroom in heaven before the Ancient of Days was a parenthetical part of the vision, given to explain why the Son of Man was descending from the clouds of heaven.

He was given a mandate to take God's authority to the earth to establish God's Kingdom here. And to do that he was given orders to defeat the Little Horn, ie the Antichrist.

In all of the NT references to Jesus' approach to God in heaven, we only have the Ascension. It is true that with the Ascension Jesus is approaching God in heaven to sit at His right hand. And in the 2nd Coming we don't have Jesus approaching God in heaven, but rather, coming back from heaven.

But inasmuch as Dan 7 is referencing the 2nd Coming, I believe the portrait of Jesus appearing before God in heaven to be an explanation of his mandate from God the Father. And this was, as you indicate, received at the Ascension.

Since the Dan 7 vision is about the 2nd Coming, I view the vision of the Mandate to be parenthetical and derived from the fact of the Ascension. Obviously, the Ascension did not happen and will not happen at the 2nd Coming. But it is mentioned because that is where Jesus obtained the authority to Come back with power, which will take place at his 2nd Coming.

There are obviously some points we agree with, and some we don't. Take care...
Upvote 0

AI is not the problem. We are

I am not sure that was the allusion he was trying to make, but that said Harlan Ellison was outraged against a lot of people. I am surprised he isn’t filing lawsuits from beyond the grave.
AM is essentially a god in the story. A sadistic god.
  • Agree
Reactions: The Liturgist
Upvote 0

No person can come to Christ by their own freewill !

I just told you what I would tell them !
Yes, something different than what Paul and Silas told someone who asked them that same question! That's very telling about you and what you believe. As for me, I would answer the exact same way that Paul and Silas did because I know that they knew what they were talking about, unlike someone like you who thinks he can answer the question better than they did.

And yes a work is any act whatsoever, the word for work ergon:

  1. business, employment, that which any one is occupied
    1. that which one undertakes to do, enterprise, undertaking
  2. any product whatever, any thing accomplished by hand, art, industry, or mind
  3. an act, deed, thing done: the idea of working is emphasised in opp. to that which is less than work

Actions of the mind are works !
I have mentioned to you multiple times now that Paul contrasted faith with works in Ephesians 2:8-9 and you still haven't addressed that! Why will you not address that? Are you just too brainwashed to do so or are you a robot? How can you equate faith with the kind of works that Paul said in relation to salvation not being by works when Paul said salvation IS through faith, but NOT by works. If faith was a work in that sense Paul would not have said that salvation is through faith. Please address this if you want to be taken seriously. If you don't, then you will continue to ignore this point while revealing that you just believe what you want to believe and don't care if you can back up your beliefs or not.
Upvote 0

AI learnt "something" from the Physical & Life Sciences Forum.

Here is the case study for the GPT-5 challenge.

First the background which was not supplied to GPT-5.

Automotive engines are susceptible to corrosion, one area in particular is the water outlet spigot to which a radiator hose is attached. The standard explanation at the time was crevice corrosion which is the result of a poorly fitted hose resulting in coolant and environmental contamination between the hose and spigot and the consumption of oxygen during the early stages of corrosion. Corrosion is accelerated when the oxygen is depleted forming an aeration or electrochemical cell composed of an oxygen depleted spigot and an oxygen rich outlet housing.

Crevice corrosion was never a satisfactory mechanism for failure as the water inlet spigot never exhibited corrosion while testing of field return parts did not detect the presence of coolant additives in the corrosion residue. The corrosion residue was also concentrated directly below the position of the hose clamp not evenly distributed if crevice corrosion was the cause.

This led to the development of a hypothesis, corrosion was caused by an electrochemical cell reaction between the outlet spigot and hose clamp. The clamp was made of stainless steel and the spigot of aluminium. Stainless steel has a lower electrode potential than aluminium making aluminium anodic in the cell reaction and corroding preferentially.
This explained why corrosion never occurred on the inlet spigot as it was made of stainless steel like the hose clamp and an electrochemical cell could not form.
The presence of an electrochemical cell was verified by measuring a voltage over the radiator clamp and outlet housing both in situ in the engine and on field return parts using a multimeter.
An accelerated corrosion test reproduced the corrosion problem by applying a 12V potential over the clamp as the cathode and the outer aluminium housing as the anode for 72 hrs.

Radiator hoses are heavily filled with carbon black to impart physical properties such as hardness and tensile strength but are also electrically conductive.
The countermeasures proposed to the engine design department in Japan (Toyota) was to use a high electrically resistant radiator hose or a powder coated hose clamp to electrically isolate the clamp both of which passed the accelerated corrosion test.
Japan surprisingly chose a third option to isolate the spigot by powder coating which was technically the most risky option as imperfections in the coating could lead to pitting corrosion.

Now for the GPT-5 test.
I gave it minimal information.

Case history: Toyota’s experienced corrosion of a spigot on the engine housing. Over the spigot was a radiator hose carrying engine coolant. Analysis of the corrosion pattern revealed the corrosion was pronounced directly under hose clip and not spread over the spigot where the hose contacted it. Consider mechanisms for corrosion and possible countermeasures.

To which it gave a detailed response.
Great case — interesting pattern. Below I’ll list the most likely corrosion mechanisms that would produce localized attack beneath the hose clip (but not across the whole hose-contact area), then give diagnostic checks you can run and practical countermeasures ranked by ease/impact.

Likely mechanisms (ranked)​

  1. Crevice / oxygen-concentration cell (most likely).
    A clamp compresses the hose and creates a narrow crevice at the hose/clamp edge where electrolyte (coolant, road salt, condensation) can collect and oxygen is depleted. The metal under the clamp becomes the anode (oxygen-poor) and corrodes rapidly, while the free surfaces stay relatively passive/cathodic.
  2. Galvanic corrosion from dissimilar metals.
    If the clamp or hose ferrule is a more noble metal (e.g., stainless) than the spigot material (e.g., aluminium or cast aluminium alloy), a galvanic couple will drive the spigot (less noble) to corrode where electrical contact and electrolyte exist — the clamp region is where the electrical contact + electrolyte coincide.
  3. Local breakdown of protective coating/oxide.
    If the spigot has an oxide or coating, the clamp’s concentrated pressure or abrasion during installation may damage that protective layer only under the clamp, exposing bare metal to corrosive fluid and producing local attack.
  4. Coolant wicking/leak and chemical attack concentrated at clamp.
    A tiny leak at the clamp edge or a pinhole in the hose can let coolant seep/wick under the clamp; trapped coolant (possibly containing chlorides or low pH) accelerates corrosion at that spot.
  5. Stray/ensuing electrical current (less common).
    Stray DC current or poor grounding paths can cause anodic attack in localized areas. This is rarer but worth checking if other vehicles show electrical corrosion or if there are aftermarket electrical mods.
  6. Stress corrosion or fretting (unlikely here).
    Fretting requires movement; hose contact area is usually static. Stress corrosion is less likely unless the alloy is susceptible and there’s sustained tensile stress.

Diagnostic checks (what to inspect / measure)​

  • Remove hose and clamp, clean and visually inspect: note the exact corrosion morphology (pitting, uniform, intergranular).
  • Identify spigot material (aluminium alloy, cast iron, steel, plated?). Identify clamp material (stainless, plated steel, zinc, aluminium).
  • Analyze corrosion products if available (simple test: Fe vs Al particles; lab: EDX on a sample) — tells you which metal is corroding.
  • Check coolant chemistry: pH, chloride content, corrosion inhibitor concentration (old coolant often becomes acidic or depleted).
  • Check for damage to protective coating/oxide under clamp.
  • Measure for stray current (multimeter between spigot and chassis ground) if electrical corrosion suspected.
  • Check hose inner surface for perforations or wicking that could feed electrolyte into the crevice.

Practical countermeasures (immediate → design)​


Immediate / low cost (do these first)
  1. Replace clamp with a rubber-lined or plastic-coated clamp (or use a worm clamp with an integrated rubber sleeve). The insulating layer prevents direct metal-to-metal galvanic coupling and reduces crevice formation.
  2. Use the correct clamp material or isolate it — if spigot is aluminium, avoid bare stainless biting directly onto it; use aluminium clamp or clamp with insulating lining. If spigot is steel/iron, stainless clamp is usually fine.
  3. Clean and remove corrosion, apply corrosion inhibitor / protective coating. Wire-brush the affected area, neutralize salts, then coat with a suitable high-temperature corrosion inhibitor or grease (e.g., dielectric grease or an anti-corrosion paste) before installing new hose/clamp.
  4. Replace hose if compressed/damaged. Ensure hose inner surface isn’t degraded and the hose dimension matches the spigot so no micro-gaps remain.
Medium term / engineering controls
5. Use a clamp that spreads load / avoids point contact. A band clamp with a wider saddle or an Oetiker ear clamp with a rubber-lined sleeve spreads the compressive force and reduces crevice depth.
6. Apply an insulating sleeve between hose and spigot. A thin high-temperature rubber or polymer sleeve under the hose (or integrated rubber seat on clamp) prevents metal-metal contact and blocks galvanic current paths.
7. Surface treatment of spigot. If compatible with service temperatures and fluids, apply a durable coating (anodize for aluminium, epoxy/paint for steel, or conversion coating) or a sacrificial zinc layer if appropriate. Ensure the coating can handle clamp compression (some coatings flake under high pressure).
8. Correct clamp torque and installation practice. Over-torquing can gouge coatings and create crevices; under-torquing lets fluid migrate. Use a calibrated torque or recommended tightening practice.


Longer term / systemic fixes
9. Material compatibility review. Choose spigot and clamp materials to minimize galvanic potential (refer to galvanic series). If spigot is aluminium, prefer aluminium or insulated clamps. If spigot is iron/steel, stainless is commonly OK.
10. Coolant maintenance. Maintain correct inhibitor concentration, pH and low chloride. Replace coolant on schedule. Corrosion inhibitors protect alloys from crevice and general corrosion.
11. Redesign geometry if recurring. Modify spigot geometry so clamp sits on a flat, slightly raised boss with a built-in rubber seat or relocate clamp away from critical cast/flange edges to avoid trapping fluid.

Quick decision checklist you can follow now​

  1. Remove clamp + hose and inspect. Identify base metal and clamp metal.
  2. Clean corrosion and photograph pattern. If aluminium substrate shows corrosion and clamp is stainless, suspect galvanic + crevice.
  3. Replace clamp with a lined / insulated clamp and fit a new hose. Use proper torque.
  4. Clean and coat the spigot with a high-temp corrosion inhibitor / dielectric grease before refit.
  5. Check coolant chemistry and replace/flush if degraded.

Notes on material compatibility (short)​

  • Aluminium spigots + stainless clamps = risk of galvanic attack on aluminium if electrolyte is present. Either electrically isolate (rubber lining) or use aluminium-compatible clamp.
  • Carbon steel spigots + stainless clamps usually result in the steel corroding (steel less noble); sacrificial coatings or stainless are OK depending on environment.

If you want, I can:​

  • Provide a short materials compatibility chart for common spigot/clamp combos.
  • Draft a step-by-step inspection and repair procedure (torques, recommended products for inhibitor/grease, part numbers for lined clamps).
  • Suggest laboratory tests or sample analysis wording if you plan to send a sample for metallurgical analysis.
Would you like the materials compatibility chart / a step-by-step repair checklist next?
The likely mechanisms listed by GPT-5 were considered in the investigation accept mechanism (2) where GPT-5 seems to have ignored there is radiator hose between the clamp and hose and there is no physical contact between the clamp, spigot and coolant in its account of galvanic corrosion. Its conclusion for galvanic corrosion is correct including the countermeasure for isolating the clamp or suggesting the Japanese method of isolating the spigot but ignoring the role of the hose it came up with the right answers for the wrong reasons.

Since mechanism (2) being diplomatic is roughly the correct answer I asked GPT-5 where did it come up with this answer, as a LLM did it find a source?

Good question — thanks for checking. Short answer: I didn’t rely on any private case file or earlier message-specific data for mechanism (2); I inferred it from standard corrosion science and common automotive materials/practices. Here’s how that inference works (plain-language, not hidden chain-of-thought):


  1. Basic principle used
    • Galvanic corrosion is a well-established electrochemical phenomenon: when two dissimilar metals electrically contact each other in the presence of an electrolyte, the less-noble metal becomes anodic and corrodes preferentially. That’s a textbook cause of localized attack where two metals meet under wet conditions.
  2. Why that fits your observed pattern
    • Your observation: corrosion concentrated directly under the hose clip and not across the entire hose contact area.
    • A hose clamp is a small, discrete metal contact that often provides both good electrical contact and a place for coolant or road splash to collect. If the clamp is a different (more noble) metal than the spigot, the clamp area is exactly where a galvanic cell would form and localize corrosion — matching the pattern you described.
  3. Practical context that makes this plausible in cars
    • Common automotive practice: clamps are frequently stainless steel or plated steel; spigots can be aluminium, cast aluminium alloy, or plated steel. Stainless on aluminium is a known risky pairing in chloride-containing environments (road salt, degraded coolant).
    • The clamp also compresses the hose and can create crevices, so galvanic and crevice mechanisms can act together — which I noted as separate but compatible possibilities.
  4. How I suggested confirming it (diagnostics)
    • Identify metals (visual, magnet test, oxide color, or lab EDX).
    • Check corrosion products (iron oxides vs aluminium hydroxides).
    • Build the galvanic-case evidence: clamp = more noble metal, electrolyte present, clear metal-to-metal contact at the corroded spot.
  5. No hidden data used
    • I applied general materials-science rules plus typical automotive component choices; I did not pull a prior-specific file about this Toyota or specific part. If you want, I can search and cite automotive corrosion studies or OEM service bulletins that report similar clamp-edge corrosion.

If you’d like citations (papers, OEM service bulletins, or galvanic series charts) I can fetch recent sources and examples — want me to look them up?
Despite the omission of the hose in its role for galvanic corrosion, I suspect if I had GPT-5 at the time the identification of the failure mode would have come sooner than later.
Upvote 0

Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

College science professors expect you to believe what they teach you, or it's curtains.
I took my first graduate course in immunology from a professor who was a YEC. He made no secret of his beliefs, but he never expected any of us to believe them. When I taught a biology class, I had at least one YEC. I told the class that all they had to do was learn what scientists say about the issue, and if they wanted to add "I don't believe any of that" on their papers, that would be fine.
  • Like
Reactions: dlamberth
Upvote 0

No person can come to Christ by their own freewill !

I saw your view, but it doesnt change anything I stated.
But you should be willing to address what I said instead of just ignoring it. Pharaoh was given as an example of a vessel of wrath and it absolutely does not say he was made a vessel of wrath from birth. Clearly, God didn't start dealing with Pharaoh and using him for His purposes until well after he had already hardened his own heart and decided to be an evil person who ended up mistreating God's people and keeping them as slaves.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,873,114
Messages
65,328,338
Members
276,077
Latest member
Dave_101